No amount of shilling will ever convince me any car built after the year 2000 looks good. Design fell of a cliff between 98 and 2005 and has never recovered. (I will make one exception, for the first gen Honda Element, which is a solid 6/10)
cars for plebs are garbage but if you have money you can still buy some nice looking cars.
>>28907173>>28907176VW cannot make nice looking cars.
>>28907165
>>28907178now that you mention it the B9 S5 was also a nice looking car.
of course even the cheap car companies still know how to make great looking cars, you're just not allowed to buy them.
the biggest problem is interiors over the last 5-10 years, but even then, if you have the money..
>>28907173>pic not related
>>28907173>>28907176>>28907177>>28907180>supercarslop yawn >>28907183>beltline 5 feet off the ground >resale value grey >>28907185Only acceptable car in this thread
Pininfarina still had it up until about 2010
>>28907165Broke cunt
The current sonata is well designed, even if it's not quite as pretty as the literally perfect 2004 Honda Accord
>>28907212>light bar
The frontier is iconic
>>28907214>noooo I'm too cool for fun things I have to murder out my car at all costslight bars are cool
Fisker's only decent looking independent project
>>28907214Light bars are objectively cool as fuck, tastelet
>>28907216that one is acceptable since it's not some current year LED niggershit
Recession era half tons are peak truck design
The American miatas are both pretty
This is the least flattering lc500 spec I could find and it still looks good
i8
>>28907165pearls before swine i suppose.
>>28907226ah i see it's just contrarianism
It is a fact streamlined dildo looking cars are appealing to faggots.Cuz they look like dildos.
>>28907224They look over 6 million times better on the rear doebeit
>>28907165>Don't have money>Thinks cars he can't afford looks badToo obvious
>>28907165For me the cut off is 2004 but only because it's the last year of the C5. The only acceptable exception posted so far ITT is the Nissan Nigger Vision.
>>28907165>No amount of shilling will ever convince me any car built after the year 2000 looks good.orly? Henrik Fisker and Ian Callum would like a word
>>28907216Light bars are cool, squinty slits are not
>>28907173>>28907176Supercars are genuinely gay and soulless.
>>28907228They look shit
These are breddy gud
>>28908747Nigger cars
>>28908775low test
>>28908747challengers look great except for the B pillar, it's just so fucking fat it looks awful
>>28908783fun fact: that is actually a c pillar
>>28907165sedans (and Subaru as a whole) peaked with the 2005 Legacy GT and never recovered
>>28907273that would mean i'm only being contrarian to people who just buy anything that gets them from A to B and don't give a shit about what they're driving, so who cares
>>28908444CheckedGreat taste as well
>>28907173Does it run off babies tears?
>>28908962Its bigger brothers aren't bad looking either
>>28909025Or if you like your skin panels in carbon fibre
>>28908813Delusional
>>28909228
>>28908813I think the 2008s look better desu
>>28907224>posts something that isn't a light barI'm sorry I had to be the one to break your heart.
>>28908855several objectively good cars have been posted and you've snubbed them without any consideration. it's not about looks or presentation of the cars, it's about you having nothing going on in your life, so you latch onto a superiority complex about things you don't own.
