[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: CABALIER.jpg (25 KB, 636x357)
25 KB JPG
Post cars nobody would have bought if they had more money
>>
File: Alfa-Romeo-Arna_0.jpg (178 KB, 1280x1031)
178 KB JPG
Alfa Arna.
>>
File: JORBY.jpg (32 KB, 636x357)
32 KB JPG
>>
File: HERNET.jpg (11 KB, 275x183)
11 KB JPG
Dodge Hornet
>>
>>28918039
>Alfa Romeo
>Box Four
>Collaboration between Nissan and Alfa Romeo
>Built in Italy with parts shipped from Japan

What the fuck?
>>
Saturn SL1
>>
File: LUMINRA.jpg (12 KB, 225x225)
12 KB JPG
Chevy Lumina
>>
>>28918037
1986 Toyota corolla
>>
>>28918053
>RWD soul in a sea of FWD cuckboxes
>unwanted
>>
>>28918047
people loved those and thought the coupe variants were very stylish.
>>
>>28918041
I didn't even know that was a thing.
What Fiat is that rebranded from?
>>
File: file.png (625 KB, 1452x849)
625 KB PNG
>>28918119
It's an Alfa Tonale
It's also Savage By Design™
>>
>>28918047
Bought this on purpose. Twice.
>>
>>28918037
Every kia/hyundai
>>
>>28918177
I'm sorry you were/are poor.
>>
>>28918041
I know a woman that has one of these, one of two in town. Her husband has a Dodge RAM truck for his vehicle and also a 70s Challenger with collector plates sitting in the garage. She had a Dodge Dart 1.4L turbo she was proud of, which I was just like "haha, yea..." Then she started complaining about it constantly nickel and dimeing her over stupid things like seatbelt sensors at 50k miles. She eventually went back to the Dodge dealer and traded it in for a Hornet. I'm just waiting for a year from now where she starts complaining about the Hornet breaking.

She also questioned why I didn't also buy a Hornet and got a Maverick instead. Her husband doesn't like the Maverick.
>>
>>28918047
I mean, the very first Saturns were actually pretty interesting cars with a totally different dealer experience. GM was trying to build good will with the Saturn brand, so they had a pretty good reputation after a few years, even if the cars were kind of junk. People would intentionally buy one over another car.
>>
File: file.png (1.93 MB, 2001x1102)
1.93 MB PNG
>>
>>28918298
>>28918037
>>28918039
>>28918047
>>28918048
The 90s really were a dark age for design
>>
File: 1998 HYUNDAI EXCEL.jpg (214 KB, 800x540)
214 KB JPG
>>28918037
They sold a lot of these shitboxes, fairly reliable, very ugly and 2nd hand they turned into a mobile home for meth heads
>>
>>28918040
gosh these were just putrid.

they were bad when they launched, and then Dodge decided to peddle them onto poor people for another decade so it stuck around as a car you could buy for $300/mo for 72 months. and for some reason they had the smallest third row on the planet. these almost universally died before 120k miles, usually the transmission, but it was such a dogwater ass car that by that time it was totaled.
>>
>>28918047
nah, i’d love a saturn equivalent nowadays. small economical sedan with piecewise options that doesn’t rust? yeah sign me up
>>
>>28918298
while ugly, this is what you got if you were a Ford man at the time. the crown victoria was a much different car and almost everything else was in a different price tier. it’s not an aspirational car but it could be choice #1 for many.
>>
>>28918343
the people who bought these back then are the same retards buying byd's and mahindras now
only difference that excels lasted 30+ years
>>
>>28918392
If they get more than 10 years out of those little dumpsters it'll be a miracle
>>
>>28918047
I loved my Saturn and it was my first choice, but I liked the 91-95 design more than the later model designs..
>>
File: falcon96.png (588 KB, 960x540)
588 KB PNG
>>28918388
They tried to sell it in my country alongside pic related, the Ford Falcon which was designed/built here. It was cheaper, had a V8 option and all models were RWD, so the Taurus was a total flop against it.
>>
>>28918037
These cocksuckers were actually pretty reliable. They had better AC than anything else in its class too
>>
>>28918402
The 90s were a substantially different time. Trucks were not nearly as popular in the beginning part of the decade. SUVs were taking off, but many weren’t willing to take that plunge. The step from a Taurus to an Explorer is a much larger leap in 1997 than 2026.

There was still a mild stigma attached to owning German or Japanese. The Koreans were nonexistent or perceived as unreliable cheap shitboxes. People didn’t switch brands as often, or if they did, they remained within the same parent company. OEM’s tried better to make a car for every type of person. And people bought cars more often - there was still a negative perception of owning a 5+ year old car from how unreliable 70s and 80s cars were.

So yeah, if you were a middle class guy, who only ever owned Fords (or worked for Ford), and your 1993 taurus got a little long in the tooth, you were probably replacing it with a 1998 Taurus. If you decide you want to move on from your 2020 Fusion, you’re probably looking at an Escape or moving to another brand entirely.
>>
>>28918242
>Her husband doesn't like the Maverick.
There is seething that unibody trucks are Not A Real Truck (NART). It's got a pickup bed, drives like a car, and you can put stuff in the back. It's a shitty car truck, but people are happy with the shitty car truck.

Me? I just use a hatchback with spring boosters. It looks downright heretical what I do to it.
>>
>>28918392
>only difference that excels lasted 30+ years
Turns out buying old, busted Japanese tooling is still better than buying new Chinese and Indian hardware.
>>
File: Hindustan Ambassador.jpg (72 KB, 1024x682)
72 KB JPG
>>28919337
Well India is and was using garbage from the UK Victorian Era and 1940's industrial cast-offs, China started out with 1950's USSR garbage and thrown into the hands of illiterate rice farmers
The poo's only stopped making these in about 2014-15 and they're like the 3rtd world, off-brand version of a late 50's Morris something or other
>>
>>28919353
>they're like the 3rtd world, off-brand version of a late 50's Morris something or other
They literally are a licensed version of the Morris Oxford. Indian Engineering is usually a byword for complete garbage but the Ambassador acquired a reputation for being absolutely bulletproof, and could stay on the road for decades with regular maintenance.
>>
>>28919364
Having a 60 year continuous part supply will do that, plus they're about as simple as an ox-cart
They still make the Royal Enfield Bullet motorcycle practically much the same as they were last century and they've been in production in some form since the 1930's
>>
>>28919335
i don’t see why there’s so much seethe. until Ford makes a PHEV Ranger in the US the Maverick is the only real fuel efficient truck option for someone that doesn’t need to tow. The ICE ranger, colorado, Ridgeline, Gladiator, all get shit MPGs compared to the hybrid. And the santa cruz is ugly and a pos.

It’s a pragmatic assessment of your situation and buying exactly the car for your needs, rather than buying something where you will waste 90% of its potential while you drive from A to B. Maybe the seethe is because it doesn’t justify others’ frivolous purchases.
>>
>>28918402
"who laughing now mudder fucker.."



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.