lol a base model half ton starts at like $150k down there. 15mpg would fuck your ass at the fuck pump. Rangers are cheaper in Europe because they're a euro tier vehicle (gay).

>>28919301
>because they're a euro tier vehicle (gay).
lol

>>28919296
They don't even sell the big dog ford trucks in Australia through official channels and they are not designed with our infrastructure in mind so they're pretty much useless. Rural farmers are just about the only ones with a legitimate use case for them. Even fleet vehicles are mostly either smaller pickups (utes) like the ranger, or vans or actual trucks. That being said, for some regarded reason we are moving in the direction of everything becoming a fuck huge yank truck even the supposedly smaller utes.

>>28919296
Australia is upside down. It's science.

>>28919296
poverty.

File: 1745663290425025.jpg (152 KB, 1000x566)

152 KB JPG

ranger was designed in australia for australia. makes perfect sense

>>28919719
I just audibly laughed on the toilet. Thank you for that obvious but delightful quip.
>>28919301
Anyone have the MSRPs side by side? I bet that's most of the story. In the US the Ranger winds up like 10% cheaper than the half ton, and why bother when you get a so much roomier, more capable vehicle for so little extra money?

I fucking despise comically oversized american garbage.

>>28919296
F150 is like 3x the price of a ranger that's why.

>>28919296
if you could buy aussie/euro spec rangers, wouldnt you?