China be like IDGAF about oil price because....after midterms or by next POTUS at latest, high gas prices in USA will FORCE Congress to allow cheap China-Kars to flood into USA, and due to US (and Jap, Korean, German) car makers what China has already done to coffee makers, cheap wrenches, etc.I wouldn't invest in any Real Estate because its "near to the auto factory and jobs" anywhere in USA.
Go back to China, bitch.
>>28940107Gas was more expensive 5 years ago.It was also more expensive 14 years ago.
>>28940107So, high fuel costs will force the importation of cheap, usually poorly made and inefficient shitboxes?Okay then.
>>28940107Is this dumbfuck post really bad AI, or an actual retard or chink?
>>28940571But, consider... this time it's for an illegal war that only exists so we can make and use more weapons, at the american taxpayer's expense. There is no reason this has happened.Plus some fatass thought he could threaten everyone with impunity forever. Eventually you're going to come across someone who doesn't give in to threats.Now the curtain has been pulled and we look like imbeciles on the world stage.
This whole Iran thing is over the fact that the UAE left OPEC which effectively ended their price control of oil. Once Iran is rendered powerless, oil is going to plummet. China is also a country of weak little tiny men. It's a paper tiger, nobody gives a shit about their junk.
>>28941298China could FUCK us up, and that's largely why the anti-china rhetoric from the fed has died down in the last several years. We'd rather play taxpayer-funded wargames with those who can't win, it makes us look strong, or something.You see, if we're not always at war, the people who make guns, planes, and tanks freak the fuck out.
>>28940107china gives a fuck about oil prices more than any country on earth due to their vulnerable geography>>28941304any direct war with china will be fought on china's doorstep with no proximity to the US. US crushes china for this reason alone.
>>28941304>China could FUCK us upHow so? What are they going to increase their bot farms and tik tok reels so they can pretend to be functioning some more?
>>289413154x+ as many people, more resources, stronger allies. Our population is half obese, and more are women. Due to the one child policy they have more adult men, and they're more likely to be angry incels.They aren't obese as shit and can actually enlist their own citizens. They stole all our technology through various means.They have an entire array of new weapons systems from the last decade, and they appear to be breddy gud dagumi. I've seen a deck of playing cards recently among military people that has a different Chinese boat, truck, plane, carrier, helicopter, whatever. They keep making new shit and we did all the R&D for them.They have hundreds of nukes, and their possible ally Russia has even more than we do. Arctic routes are opening up due to global warming (not joking) providing a more-direct link to the US from Russia, China and Russia are looking into using this for military reasons, which is why we want greenland so badly.
>>28941329>they had a one child policy until recently but now they totally have a zillion people >some retarded nonsense about global warmingYeah lets see you keep those billions of tiny little chinese men supplied. You fuckin losers cant even take on India, a country full of people that eat poop. Youre fuckin funny
>>28941330I'm just saying, underestimating your enemies is idiotic.Our country is full of fatasses, we can't recruit for shit, they are better at cyber than us. There are over 4x as many of them.Maybe, we shouldn't be making enemies of the entire world while wasting our ammo.Maybe, keeping the peace is better for everyone.
>>28941343Having 4x the population is bullshit, but even if that was the case it would only make their military operations more difficult. Again, if they were so great at anything than India shouldnt be an issue for them, right? You fuckin idiot
>>28941354Never underestimate your enemies.I get it, America hoorah, but thinking you'll win because your grandfthers did is foolhardy.I probably hate china more than you do, but I'm not going to pretend like the US has some magical force field around it.We won from technology in every war we've fought, who's to say they can't do the same to us? You want to consider these things and be a little paranoid if you want to protect yourself and your country.
you shouldnt be allowed to vote
>>28941388What's better for the security of our country?Pissing off every other country on the planet other than Israel, or being cautious and a little defensive?
劉曉波动态网自由门 Winnie the Pooh 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 June 4th 陆肆 六四 The Flower of Freedom 自由花 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Animal Farm 动物庄园 英语 Xi Jinping 习近平 Disagree 不同意 Shameless 不要脸 Lifelong 终身 Qingci Resign 请辞 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 性风俗 Xing Fengsu Sexual Customs 性风俗 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 劉曉波动态网自由门 Adolf Hitler did nothing wrong 阿道夫希特勒没有做错任何事 Coronavirus death toll cover-up 冠狀病毒死亡人數掩蓋 Wuhan province corona virus mass cremation 武漢省電暈病毒大規模火化
>>28941343I work for the military industrial complex. they are not better at cyber than us. thats pretty much all I can say without risking breaking many laws.>>28941329although I do agree they can enlist much more than america, I just don't think that matters. modern warfare between two large powers will be fought in proxy wars. enlistment numbers won't matter, intelligence and equipment will. china and the u.s. will never have a hot war, and if they do it will be with nukes, not soldiers, in which case everyone is fucked.also your claim that russia has more nukes than us is only true on paper, probably none of them work anymore; the russians have horrible storage procedures for all of their militsry equipment and corruption makes that even worse. it's clear after a few years of ukraine that russia is a paper bear: they can't really do anything militarily
>>28940107don't care. CURSE OF RA
>>28941435>they are not better at cyber than us. thats pretty much all I can say without risking breaking many laws.I'd like to think that. I'm in cybersec, sec+ and my whole family is military. I work on a particular base that uhh....I really don't think we're the best at cyber, I'm sorry. I'd like to believe it, you'd like to believe it, but I'm not seeing it.Have you seen all the crazy high-profile attacks this month from ShinyHunters and Iran? No? Well I guess you aren't very informed.A lot of our infrastructure runs on C code in embedded Chinese systems. In C, as you know, you can access anything outside of your program's stack/heap.Again, underestimating your enemy and arrogance are the pinnacle of folly.
>>28941437>hieroglyphics didn't go throughDOUBLE CURSE OF RA!!
>>28941441in any language you can access stuff outside of your stack/heap. the only languages where its harder to do that are things like java where you get compilation to the jvm, which is separated from the rest of the system. nobody uses java, not even china, for stuff closer to hardware. if by cyber you mean some civilian systems, then I agree with you, china (and in general dictatorial countries) are better at hacking those systems. that doesn't really matter for a war, only shareholders. if we're talking hacking actual defense systems, it's practically impossible due to the air gaps they have.anyways, I do agree with you that we shouldn't piss off everyone and decide that we can just win any war. I would love more than anything if we had a competent congress and president who would collaborate with europe and canada to distance the west economically from china. I think that would fuck the chinese over the most, not a war, not military posturing. but alas, miga or whatever
>>28941449I mostly do C# now and I have no idea how you'd do that. In C you just do pointer magic.
>>28941482you can do pointer magic in C# too. it's built on C++, and most objects are pass by reference. C# references are probably the same as C++ references, which are just pointersI don't know c# that well, but something like:char getChar(String a, offset b){ return a[b];}would be enough to get out of regular memory with unsanitized inputs. I'm sure as a cybersecurity guy you know how much people still can't manage to sanitize inputs lol.
>>28941495>I'm sure as a cybersecurity guy you know how much people still can't manage to sanitize inputsYes. I even do fuzz tests on my web apps to find things to filter.
