Would I be able to cross this ford in a hatchback that has 4wd?
>>28422424wd is irrelevant in this situation. Hatchback is irrelevant in this situation. The only thing that matters is the depth of the water and the clearance of your suspension. We have no fucking way of knowing either variable. Fuck you OP for wasting our time.
>>2842252It looks like 6 inches or lessI should know>>2842242Looks like just about any car can ford this. Go slow, if it is around a foot deep or more with that current you might have an issue.
>>2842261>Go slow, if it is around a foot deep or more with that current you might have an issue.Go fast. Slow will get you killed or embarrassed. There's no backing out once you realize you're in trouble
>>2842252Suspension height doesn't really matter unless you're in something stupid low or there's huge bumps/dips/rocks hidden under that water. What matters is:>Height and design of air intake>Weight of vehicle in proportion to the amount of water displaced.>Tires>Location of ECU/sensitive electronics
>>2842242I grew up in a very rural area and did some serious offroading that would put most jeeps to shame in a 2001 toyota camry. you'll probably be fine.
No sorry, you need a rock buggy with portals and 44s to cross that 6” of water
>>2842242I'll never understand why people will risk their car just to get to a trailhead.
>>2842556fortune favors the bold, anon
>>2842252Depth doesnt matter.Flow rate does.
>>2842556ya but what if you dont get head?
>>2842556Stupidity. I wouldn't risk my Raptor's wheel bearings on a water crossing unless my life depended on it. In a car? Nfw.
