It's time to return to mother nature! Anything artificial shouldn't be brought or crafted!
>>2854510You CAN NOT do this.Idk why this comes up so much. Life is not a computer game. You will either fail or die.The world is not the same anymore as it was before man became sedentary. The world is now inhabited by 8 billion people. Entire ecosystems were changed to serve those 8 billion people that make up 'society' and they will not choose to suffer only you can put your retarded ideas into action.Further more you have evolved to depend on a small set of technologies, like clothing, weapons and tools.This was also ever only possible in select regions that offered favourable conditions. The further man strayed the more man became dependent on more technology.Survivability was low back then, even for people who grew up like that, had a group and the required knowledge. Life still was hard, even if you were one of those who survived.And that was when the conditions 'allowed' for this, small groupd of humans went unimpeded and did whatever they needed to survive on vast territories required for their survival. With the current population density you'll be competing for everything with many other people and none of them will respect your selfish and retarded decission and make concessions like that.Lastly define 'artificial'.
>>2854530I agree Human population should be 100k globally
>>2854531you do realize that you certainly wouldn't be in that 100k, right?
>>2854530Never said that everyone should abandon civilization.By artificial, I mean clothing and manmade items.
>>2854532You do realize this is every faggots response literally every single time
>>2854545>OH NO HOW DARE YOU SPEAK REASON !
>>2854545yeah, you are doing the same faggot thing over and over and you get the same logical response.
>>2854540In that case I must repeat myself: You will not live. You can not.
>>2854557What would be the most hospitable environment for a 100% naked human to live in then? Or how long could they live hypothetically in certain environments?
>>2854558>100% naked human to liveHumans haven't managed this for the last 260000 years or so.
>>2854553No it means youre a completely brain dead npc robot that regurgitates the same exact identical answer as every other npc as if it were something I didn't knowI can't believe I even had to explain this but youre so fucking dumb and lacking sentience you didnt get it even after the first jabFucking hell you are so spectacularly fucking stupidA truly transcendent moron Someone as fucking dumb as you shouldnt have even made it to adulthoodYou should have forgotten to breath at some point as a child or chewed on a power cable Thats how stupid you areFucking simpleton
>>2854561Please start using your head for more then a hat rack.
>>2854561autistic screeching isn't an argument son.
>>2854558I want to rephrase your question as 'where will it take the longest for me to succunb to exposure and malnutrition?'I believe it could be argued that areas which, historically were or even presently are known to inhabit actual hunterer gatherers or primitive people. Areas where sedentary humans never became much of a thing.So examples would be areas of africa, inhabited by San and closely related people, like botsuana, SA, namibia, sambia.Australian bushes where aboriginies managed to survive that way.Amazon rain forest, where we know that uncontacted peoples exist to this day.But:This assessment may be short sighted. I've said it before: Those people manage to scrape by because of traditions and knowledge they hold and because they were raised like that. Airdropping you there might lead to a sooner demise than other places.Assuming you're not going to manage to feed yourself in any place, I would prioritise in this order:-Temperature, not too cold at night so you don't die and prefferably get some sleep. Not too hot during the day that you'll be unable to make anything out of it. -Easily accessible water. Depending on how fat you are you'll die in months from malnutrition. But you'll die much sooner from a lack of water.-Food. With the above covered you might now survive long enough to worry about feeding yourself. On the long run you'll probably want wild game, fish and honey. But fruit only will do fine in extending your misery a bit.-Predation. Absence of predation just statistically gives you better odds and also better sleep which improves your odds overall. If I was you and you were doing this I'd consider modern man a potential predator. With all that checked I would give you 2 months.
>>2854607forgot pic of OPbut no clothes
>>2854530Tl;dr + you're brown lol
Cavemen have hunted for at least 100 000 years when fauna was abundant.Now there isn't much to eat unless you live in the Amazon or Siberia. You have to depend on the agrarian society to a certain extent because even if you want to grow your own crops you still need to own the landTbh I wouldn't want to be an amazonian hunter gatherer, it probably sucks overall compared to modern comfort. Watch Apocalypto to get a glimpse of it
>>2854627Apocalypto is revisionist propaganda.
>>2854628I do know having to rely on your next hunt to be able to fill your belly is not the easiest life to liveYou can also do it the Papuan way and plant some potatoes and yams but it sounds very niggerish to me
>>2854630OP will die before the first harvest. He needs a way to make ends meet until then. I mean OP is dead in no time anyways but for the sake of the academic discussion I'm not even sure if OP has already explained his stance on wether this would even be permissible in his personal belief system. Don't forget OP wamts to be naked because clothes artificial. So I'd argue any crop that is the result of domestication, selective breeding etc. is outside of the scope and I know too little about the wild ancestors of potato and yams but I do know that most fruit, vegetables etc. in their natural state are abyssmal.
So it isn't possible for a human to live like this without going full Tarzan mode?
>>2854532There's a pretty good chance I would be.
>>2854642You can do it in tropical countries but you'll get ravaged by mosquitoes. You'll still need to feed yourself too
>>2854643no, there isn't son.I mean basic probability puts it under 1 in 60k, then factoring in your mental disabilities, your shitty personality, and awful work ethic, well you are fucked kiddo.
>>2854676So it's still possible.Mud can be used as mosquito repellent.Feeding yourself is obvious, unless you meant by how hard it is to scavenge for food.Also, thought on this 82 Japanese man? https://paradise.docastaway.com/old-japanese-nude-remote-island/
>>2854733*82-year-old Japanese man?
>>2854733It is an interesting story. Seems like he has mood swings caused by social isolation tho If I had to lead to live that life I would try not to isolate myself completely from nearby people so I don't become insane from loneliness Also he has the chance to live in a high trust society. You can't do that in a black or latino populated tropical area, people would murder you at some point
>>2854532You replied to a jew so he probably would be
>>2854752naw, jews know how numbers work.
