You did visit Patagonia before some tourist decided to burn it down, right?
>>2856950Imma be a hundo witcha ya, chief. The Patagonia region is YUGE. You can't burn it down. All ya'll need to go outside more.
>>2856950This is antisemetic. Mods please remove.
>>2856950How do those green trees in a green surrounding burn so easily?
>>2857444why did everything in paradise valley burn except the plastic childrens toys?
>>2857412China turned the money spigot off my jeet son, stand by for new NPC firmware.
>>2856950>>2857412> +$7,000.00 for each new fire started
>>2856950>tourist
>>2856950>Tierra del Fuego>is on fireI see nothing wrong here
>>2856950>(((Tourist)))
(((tourist)))
>>2856950>some tourist decided to burn it downhorseshit. it was probably a lightning strike or downed power line.
how badly did it get burned down? i'm so fucking sick of everything nice getting burned down all the time.
>>2857444pine resin is incredibly flamable
>>2857444Have you never lit a fire?
>>2857444Jewish space lasers?
>>2857871Shalom.>>2857569Goldman Sachs owns Tierra del Fuego.I wish I was joking.
>>2857874>Goldman Sachs owns Tierra del Fuego.Proofs?
>>2857874no but seriously >>2857877I want to know about these things
>>2857877>>2857879>>2857877There is a list of land purchases and "conservation" projects funded by Goldman Sachs. I know about it because I know an investment broker that is an account manager with them and we were talking about this back in the early 2000s when they,GS, started nabbing land defaults from logging cartels.As usual you can ask google "does Goldman Sachs own Tierra del fuego"It will say "no" than list off a ton of land purchases and financing initiatives that turn it to word play as to "no but really yes but technically no"In this case GS started with land investment then went all in by buying out failed logging operations starting in the 2000s and financing property speculation. Lots of billionaires have houses in TdF.
>>2857882That's horrifying
>>2857882looks like their holding is around 1150 sq miles?
>>2857874The idea of ownership is just a shackle of your mind.You think some banker is coming out of the woods and buzz you off the land once you get there?
>>2857886I have no idea what you're trying to say or how this blob of disjointed ideas relates, at all, to what I said.I expect you'll respond with something even more incoherent and unrelated.>>2857885They're holding more than that. They are essentially using it as a way to grease the palms of the local politicians. Look at how much they're spending on a park in a third world country that could be run almost completely by volunteers.Also, again, many Goldman Sachs CLIENTS own homes in tierra del fuego.Ironically they declared beavers "invasive" because they mess up logging operations and real estate projects on watersheds... literally the only people who hate beavers are loggers and people trying to build on wetlands.
wow this thread really made tranny jannies work overtime huh? protip: look up what streisand effect is before going scorched earth on this thread
>>2857899I'm saying I don't give a shit about your Goldman Sachs fantasies.
>>2857899>Ironically they declared beavers "invasive" because they mess up logging operations and real estate projects on watershedsI don't think that's accurate though. Argie here, and I have lived in Ushuaia (not from there originally): beavers were introduced around 1950, and they overtook the whole ecosystem. They eat through whole forests and destroy national parks (Lapataia, for example) because they have no natural predators. In the 70s you could go shooting beavers and sell them to the govt for I don't know how much, but it was a decent amount.>literally the only people who hate beavers are loggers and people trying to build on wetlands.Have you talked to the locals? I have, they also hate themAt the same time, fuck Goldman Sachs and any (((banker))) buying up land in Argentina.
>>2857932>I so don't give a shit I'm going to keep posting about it insistently to prove how much I don't care about itThere is that mental disorder of yours showing again.>>2857935>They eat through whole forestsThis is not true at any level. They are limited to riparian areas that they select for very specific conditions. They do crop rotations so not to deplete forests and they usually limit the size of the trees they eat. The trees they focus on are willow and other riparian deciduous trees--ALL riparian deciduous trees are aggressive and actually do better because of beaver prune backs. >The only people that hate loggers are land developers and loggersThe locals are poor retards that take the money the loggers giver them and the land developers give them and parrot what the people giving them money say. They're just like the american retards crying about beavers because the beavers force humans to actually think about the watershed and where they build on the watershed and humans are short sighted retards that LOVE building on the most retarded parts of the watershed.Beavers build riparian habitat and increase watershed retention. This is a NET benefit to the local forest. This will always be a net benefit to every forest on fucking earth.There is NO example beavers causing net damage to a biome and endless examples of retarded humans mismanaging biomes and calling things problems because they "mess with the human plans" and have nothing to do with the health of nature.
>>2856950Went when I was a kid but dont remember much. Aside from the megasloth caves any good /out/ings recs?
>>2857970Alright, you honestly seem to know what you're talking about so I'll trust you. I was just repeating what I'd heard from the locals during the time I lived there, but yeah, people tend to have a shallow understanding of things.
>>2857970I'm just irritated by your irrational believe into some banker bogeyman.I thought I could console you but you seem too far gone. Keep living in fear.
>>2857970>The locals are poor retards that take the money the loggers giver them andWow wow wow careful there my friend. Everthing you said is 100% right and I'm fully agree with you, but if you phrase it like that I'm afraid its just gonna make the locals want to oppose you and dismiss your valid ecological concerns as "hwite colonizers telling us what to do with our own land"
>>2858036>Irrational beliefIt's public information retard.>>2858040I've met enough people in logger towns to understand that ALL logging towns are saturated with morons regardless of country or ethnicity.I'm equal opportunity when it comes to hating timber cartels (because they lie about literally everything).
