Here are my bad photos of a theme park. I only took a 20 year old digishit with me. EnjoyA photo of the hotel is mandatory
>>4452693
>>4452694soi out here
>>4452696
>>4452698
>>4452701
>>4452702
>>4452703
>>4452704
>>4452706
>>4452708
>>4452712
>>4452714
>>4452720
>>4452722
>>4452723
>>4452725
>>4452726
>>4452727
>>4452728
>>4452729
pixel peeping has been approved by the autism councilbetter than mft/10content holds upequal to or greater than winogrand and shore/10vibe checks outbeats most film/10
>>4452730>>4452731thanks anon
>>4452732These low light shots were crazy. Just tried to brace up against the railings
>>4452733
>>4452734
>>4452736
>>4452737really beautiful sunset that day
>>4452738
>>4452739alright that's enough of that shit. If anyone wants to the the SOOC version of anything I'll post it for you
>>4452720Can you post the SOOC of this one?
Is this a Lumix DMC-FZ8?
So you're telling us the pictures you posted aren't SOOC? I thought you had a digishyt with you.
>>4452812You can still edit sooc jpegs. Not as much potential but who cares.
>>4452803yes>>4452804No it's an Olympus Camedia C7070>>4452812Yeah even 20 year old point and shoots can do RAW. I Shoot in RAW+jpeg cause the colors are just a little more alive when processed on the computer. I only do a simple light edit with them
it looks like theres a dark void entering your room
>>4452737nice
>>4454407thanks homie
there's a Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 to sell for just 30€Seller states that there's a slight gray marks if you photograph verticallyhe uploaded a test image.should i grab this ?
>>4457708>Lumix DMC-LF1Nah that's a boring generic point and shoot. Get something with a ccd like a coolpix s4 or a canon powershot G1-6. They're a little more money but they're more fun.
>>4452714nice>>4452703soul
>>4452906Very similar to mine, I've got the C-8080. Awesome work anon. Olympus made some great cameras. And I know the pain of trying to do any kind of even remotely low-light work with these things.>>4452703I have to know, was the diorama motorised? Do the trains actually ride around on the rollercoaster tracks?
>bad>they're all pretty decent street photographsanon please be kinder to yourselfman i looked through againsome of these are genuinely top tier work great job dude
2007/10Fun fact, I had four 190 octanes at that Fat Tuesday in my 20s and did the whole park absolutely schnockered, still have my FT cup
>>4457708>>4457760Update on the LF1turns out the hair on the picture is way more visible at f5,6 f8just opened it and removed that shit. Works perfectly now !!>ccd / g1-6nah, the only ccd i'd probably go for would be the canon s95 maybe...decent camerajust sold a g11 recently bc it's kinda slow...it's good if you're a slow photographerNow to the LF1>12mp, shoots raw/jpg 3:4>remembers last focal length so when turned on it's automatically at 35mm f8 ready to bust a nut>has a little digi VF with a button that turns off the lcdwill use it as my new glorious streetshitter pocky camera, wish me luck
These honestly just look like they're from a smartphone, there's not much of that typical digishit flaws in them that you'd see 20 years ago. Funnily enough you've bought a camera that is too good.
>>4471014The lf1 is in that weird territory of pre 1” “large sensor” cameras that were made to compete with the canon S series, but were too late in time because the rx100, gx7, and cell phones were taking over. They’re fun because they provide manual controls and such but image quality wise the 1.7” ones were always cellphone at best in good light.
>>4471014>>4471017lf1 anon here...i didn't post any images here yet...i bought it..saw that fat hair on sensor and dropped ituntil today when i fixed it...will take it out soon.
>>4452698>DevagI'd like to D her vag, if you know what I mean.
>>4464056
