previous thread: >>4432315contribute
>>4458392>>4458393>>4458401>>4458402>>4458407Kino style anon but photos have no substance.
>>4458448If it wasn't for the white border and op told you he shot them on his phone you wouldn't like them
i dont like them at alltumblr mood board but not photography. this kind of vapid shit only appeals to mentally unstable women.
>>4458458Nah, white borders are annoying. I dig his expressionist style. But he def needs substance and narrative in his photos. >>4458461WTF? I love mentally unstable women now?
i wonder if a street general would fly... i feel like it's just an invitation for trolls and we don't have quite enough volume of street shots to overpower them currently. in any case, stp is a weak abbreviation for such a general. just /street/ is fine imo
i like your textures, OP. compositions are a bit tight for me overall tho
>>4458507clearly the correct abbreviation is /strep/
>>4458825that settles it/p/, meet /strep/
>>4458805that's crazy! from the thumbnail i thought she was holding up a phone for a selfie
>>4458919her finger on the trigger is the finishing touch
>>4458954>>4458947>>4458835>>4458833>>4458832come on guys i know you can do better than this
>uhehehe uhehehe come on guys uhehehe
summoning high-contrast bw street anon
round and round
up and down
through the streets of your town
>>4459358pretty nice grab but isn't the bottom left of the pic unneeded?
>>4459388>pretty nice grab but isn't the bottom left of the pic unneeded?This is how it turned out; you know on the street not everything is in the right place.
>>4459396of course. i bring it up only to discuss composition
>>4459597Isn’t this entire pic unneeded?
Stitch phortorgaphy is the purest form of art you can create digitally.
are beaches /strep/?
I got there from a street.
This was *definitely* on a street.
>>4459991>>4459992These are landscape photos>>4459996this is product photography technically
>>4460019>These are landscape photoswhich is not mutually exclusive with street, to be clear
fresh grab
>>4460019>this is product photography technicallyno it is street. robert frank shot americans like this
>>4458402isn't he the old irish jewyorker camera youtuber?elephant whatever?
bump
>>4461563Le wild Graflex appears
>>4461626
>>4461626what a bizarre photo
punk
le slow board
>>4461933How so?
>>4458392What did you shoot these with opie?
>>4462063seems like you want the viewer to look at the gal facing the camera since no one else is making eye contact, but almost every composition choice distracts from her. also she has a weird, half-lidded, dazed expression. the texture of the photo is uncannily smooth.
high h i t l e r
Is anyone else short and invisible? Helps a bunch that people don't notice me, I've even 'disappeared' when I am with my friends but I've only just moved 2 meters.
>>4458392
>>4462170i'm short but i don't think invisible
>>4458392XD
>>4463931
Plenty of evidence in this thread that people don't really understand what Street photography is
>>4464042many such cases
>>4462066cool. i like the dual shaodw from the standing person
zz
almost three weeks in, about 5 decent photos posted that aren't mine. not enough shooters here to warrant a street general it seems
tried but people here expression no bueno
>>4464411
>>4464412
>>4464413>>4464702get closer
consider moment
>>4461933you go grocery shopping with your camera around your neck? based.
>>4464980no doi!! best way to practice street is to take a camera everywhere. everyone knows this. why did you think streetfriends are so obsessed with compact kits?
>>4464413what's the point guyseveryones just on their smartphonethere's nothing to say anymore
>>4465642
>>4465644
>>4465645
>>4465642i don't need to say anything special. love of the craft is enough for me
>>4465642I disagree.
>>4459256this one rocks, i miss my camera so much
>>4465646>>4465645>>4465644>>4465642>>4464413Don't you get in trouble for public photography in Japan? Sometimes I think I should take off my 24-105 and put on a 28mm pancake to look less discrete in Japan. >>4465371I miss San Fransisco...>>4464711>>4464225>>4463409nice shot>>4462133cute tubby chubster
>>4464413
>>4465889>>4465898dawg these look crazy. what are you shooting/editing on?
>>4465901Canon t5i mated to EF 50mm 1.8f prime, edited with photoshop. Crop factor sucks.
>>4466002i'm not talking about anything related to focal lenght. you have wild chromatic aberration on some, and your colors look a bit cooked. oversaturated perhaps, and the shadows somehow look both heavy and dull
>>4465889Great photo, anon>>4465888kino>>4465894eh>>4466002Nice backpack. Looks perfect for solo Traveling
>>4458947It moved...
>>4460375ugh can we all just admit that candid street photography looks like shit no matter who is doing it
>>4465646these labubu things crazy
She choses to be rude.
>>4466819>>4466818finally, some good frames
can't remember if already posted
>>4465894>>4466065
Caught on-the-fly with my phone. My OM-D E-M1 Mark II was not with me, sadly.
>>4467305always have a cameraalways have a camera
>>4467275I find this guy’s face so funny for some reasonlooks a bit too stretched
>>4467490
>>4458507>>4458964>>4462066>>4464048>>4464825Neat.
>>4466065>Nice backpack. Looks perfect for solo TravelingDo you know what it can be?
>>4458392I'm happy with this shot. I thought it looked very 19th-century and European, like a painting.>>4467629I don't like the dodged shadows but the girl's face in the mirror is cool.>>4467495I like the grain, the soft bars of the fence and the amber colours.>>4467494I don't like the framing because it cuts off the players too much, although the flaring highlight in the centre and the grain are a nice touch.>>4467493I don't like the sharpness even though it is technically excellent.
>>4467291I don't like the framing because it cuts off the cars at the bottom, but the exposure is excellent and the grain is pleasant.>>4467135weird/10>>4466819I don't like this perspective>>4466818like a memoryI don't like the direction of the lady on the right. If only she were looking over her shoulder...>>4466602lol at that face
>>4466587I like the framing and the subject but I'd like to see more brightness. I don't like the low contrast.>>4466585I like the subject and the framing but I don't like the high saturation and fringing.>>4466570>>4466573>you... come here often?
>>4458805Great, really good
>>4467629Really good, haven't ever seen something like it
What do you think of this street?
>>4467780Awesome
>>4468827Thanks.
>>4459269are white borders considered cheat?
>>445839235mm equiv. is the GOAT street focal length. Change my mind.
>>4469087I've been shooting with 80mm = lately and while it is tight it is doable. I also did 50mm on film and I miss it. I prefer zooms though.
triple le back
>>4469199Yes, it's a street, quite literally.
>>4466065how is >>4465889 a great photo ?>tilted>obviously staged subjet>uninteresting composition>bokeh copoutit's at best a decent portrait.
>>4469231>decentpersonally i'm bewildered by this thread. almost every photo posted by someone else itt suffers from three or more of the following problems:>no discernible composition>illegible exposure>eye-searing editing>focus leads to nothing>uneventful>bereft of emotionand based on the comments so far, it seems like no one notices..? it would be cool to get street photography going on this board but this showing has been rather bleak. i'm kind of hoping there' s no street thread after this one, but if it comes about, maybe i'll post some photos from established photographers plus resources just to help balance it out and guide anons along
>>4469266Street photography is not and never has been art. Without a veneer of nostalgia and historical interest it is all crap. All of it. Good street photography has never existed and can not exist. The moment supposed street photography becomes inherently good, it stops being street photography by definition and slips into another genre unnoticed such as abstract portraiture, documentary, new topographics, humanism, etc, and labeling it mere street photography is disrespectful to the photographer’s vision and intent. The snap you posted would be magically appealing if it were taken 40 years ago. This is a sad fact. Street photography is about as interesting as taking photos of buildings.
>>4469266why wait
>>4469266I enjoyed every photo in this thread. You just sound like a pretentious faggot.
>>4469271Street photography is not and never has been art.Without a veneer of nostalgia and historical interest it is all crap. All of it. Good street photography has never existed and can not exist. The moment supposed street photography becomes inherently good, it stops being street photography by definition and slips into another genre unnoticed such as abstract portraiture, documentary, new topographics, humanism, etc, and labeling it mere street photography is disrespectful to the photographer’s vision and intent.The snap you didn't post would be magically appealing if it were taken 40 years ago. This is a sad fact. Street photography is about as interesting as taking photos of buildings.>>4469275i don't have anything prepared yet>>4469277what am i pretending? i explicitly gave my complaints with the photos itt. do you disagree with them? if anyone sounds pretentious, it's you. or do you honestly feel the same looking at this >>4469220 compared to this >>4462066 (sorry to single you out anon, but it was simply the latest post)?
>>4469266>>4469289Yeah this fucking sucks.>Retard: You are all retarded!leave it to "street photography" to attract dunning kruger retards who think they don't have to try>a genre founded by a guy who was so quantity over quality, he left thousands of undeveloped rolls and he didn't even know what was on them>and he still managed to suck 9/10 times
>>4469231>>4469266>>4469271>>4469289>>4469299Beautiful meltdown, dogfucker. Please go on.
For me personally it's a really good way to go outside and not spend any money. Human contact is a plus.
>>4469299the people who believe that the best at anything don't fail more than those who suck are delusionalfrom quantity comes qualityfrom failing thousands (maybe millions) of times you get qualityso if you're afraid of failing then never gonna git gud
>>4469568Arts aren't entrepreneurship, besides entrepreneurs who suck fail even more than ones who don't. Although street isn't art so there's that :^)
Dead thread? Might post a few of my own, have been taking some street photos for some time now (but not as much as I'd like because people don't like having a random camera shoved in their face) and I've never shared my photos anywhere so I might just do that.We'll see. Dead thread is sad tho.
>>4470267You're welcome to do a new one.
>>4470267image limit of 150 was reached, if you mean by dead that we stopped posting photos itt. but imo the board is kinda dead these days in general
