Rainy day editionThread theme: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=phcDgM2Mazk
what's with the newfags making /rpt/ and /gear/ threads before the others are even full / autosaged?can't even link to the old one or put a link in the new one to direct people baka
>>4459943Old thread reached limit. Shut up and post recent photos.
Based caribou securing a future for his brown children among the nigger cattle.
>>4459947I think your sensor has a std
>>4459961Its called rain, something you might experience occasionally if you step outside your mom's basement. Pro tip: don't be a fool, get weather sealing for your tool.
Its good to be the king.
>>4459946no. fuckoff and link the threads properly nigger
>>4459963nah nigga thats not rain, theres fucking worms living on your sensorfilthy ass bitch
>6 rpts in the catalogWhich one should OP even link?
i like the flaring, taken with a fuji z1000exr point and shoot i bought for $45 off buyee
>>4459973There's a button up top called the Catalog. Learn how to use it, faggot.
>>4459972Looks a bit like one from my last batch (yesterday morning)
i will never own a house
>>4460175You can at least own a picture of a house anon :)
>>4460214with the direction certain policies are moving your statement might also not be true soon lol
>>4460175>>4460214>>4460223But are you happy? Asking for a German.
>>4459939Lens hoods exist.
>>4459979the most recent one
>>4460081Love this one>>4460140Awesome>>4460175Cool house, I'd maybe frame it a bit differently>>4460243Lovely>>4460250Cool pic
>>4460265
Hi friends, they say you are the strongest in the world of technology and spreading trends. Could you do something cool with the STRK coin?
>>4460265>>4460267I despise anons who answer to their own posts to make a link with their photos.I fucking hate this shit
>>4460271ok
>>4460270You mean like fucking sink it, хoхóл shit?
>>4460265Thank you
tmatrI need a microtome, slicing samples is a pain in the ass.
The day's /p/ checklist.1. Underexposed sunset
2. Backs of peoples heads
3. Vehicles
>>4460302Not fond of the bottom part of the foreground and added noise
>>4460368agreed, very fake
is there anything fundamentally wrong with taking a picture of the back of a person's headwhat if it's a really well composed image of the back of a person's head
>>4460385Like this you mean?
>>4460385wrong thread
>>4460385/p/ will shit on you for such a thing because it's normally a hallmark of a shit-tier street photo where the user has zero balls to actually engage with the peopleIn landscape it's less of a sin, and if you actually know the people in question then it's not a problem at all, despite what /p/ fags might whinge about
>>4460405>recent photo
>>4460407it's winter in the southern hemisphere, my man
>>4460408These houses don't look like they're in the southern hemisphere
>>4460407This one is more recent
>>4460405oh my god, civilization. where is this paradise?t. californian
>>4460408Wow cute dog!
>>4460711This is nice
>>4460711cinematic, anonwouldn't be me in the bar with my DSLR>what the fuck is that creep doing?>*mirror slap*
>>4460741i am triggered by the blown out and overly pulled down highlights in the windows
>>4460743Me too. I didnt even realize I slide the slider that low. >>4460741I made sure to wear my Hatsune Miku fedora and tip it at every woman while smirking.
hey fellow photographers. i am a very experienced photographer. i have a unique growing set of photos and i am wondering what i can do with them. they are studio lit and sexually explicit. am i allowed to show them here? if so, would anyone be interested in providing feedback?
>>4460836i'm only interested in fat women
>>4460836You should start your own thread if you have 12+ to share, and welcome others to contribute. A nude model thread could be good.
>>4460836yes you can post them
>>4460836>>4460867imo if you have a photo set, no more than 1 pic of it should be posted in rpt. rpt should be reserved for samples and one-offs. a photo set on the other hand is literally the perfect thing to start a thread for
>>4460891this one is really nice. what filter? red/orange?
i can photograph my innards. neat.
>>4460971Simulated red filter in RawTherapee after jacking the global saturation almost to full. I'm gonna play with this method some more.
>>4460977do vibrance instead of saturation, it likes to affect blues more, which is good for skies. also you wont run into oversaturating artifacts so easily
>>4461012Thank you!
I don't like photos with people in it. Wat Nou?
>>4461124
>>4461159sweetThe shadows were actually pretty recoverable, I thought the silhouette worked better.
Went for a walk.
>>4461214Walking is nice.
>>4461215Really quiets as well in the evening, everybody at home, watching TV I guess.
>>4461216Would walk again.
Taking sum bote pics
.
>>4460302I like the grain, it adds texture and changes the mood & atmosphere.
>>4460368>>4460374>>4461231
Fire season
Like it's sometimes written by a completely different faggot, not that I'm keeping track
>>4461264I'd still cut the lower part
>>4461349you're right. looks better
ok how about a 16:10 crop haha
>>4461366MOAR
Went to Michigan
BZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZzzzzzZzzZZ
>>4460891I have now tried this on some other photos, but the results weren't too great. This just happened to be the one in a million time where my edit actually worked. If I want to achieve this tonality more consistently, I'll just have to break down and either spend out the ass for a new monochrome sensor camera/bayer removal, or start shooting film. Digital conversions can only be taken so far.
a dog can do many things, even shop
*clips ear*
>>4461538Gross and unhygienic.
>>4461538for alcohol, even>>4461564dog website. go back.
>>4461538for alcohol, even>>4461564dog websitego back.
im not going to sit here for ten fucking minutes to delete an accidental post jfcworthless website
>>4461580>russian dog
>>4461613>>4461610>>4461609What phone?
Rainbows are clearly an optical phenomenon attesting to us living under a crystal dome of some sort.
>>4461564I always wash my hands properly after having been at the grocery store.
>>4461614Your wife's
A nifty fifty kicks ass at night, although it's a little tight on crop. Tips for shooting at 1.8f?
>>4461633>Tips for shooting at 1.8f?Make sure you set your aperture to f/1.8. Hope this helps.
>>4461564put your bubble suit on, spastic
>>4461618>4chin>wife
>>4461653Nice idea but too much space between the two men makes it unbalanced, this way the man in the middle is kind of in the shadows but way too close to the light.The vertical lines also aren't vertical.>>4461633The quality's too low, the lights are all burned, the lit up building is a great distraction since it's the only one lit up, and the sky's an odd color to contrast with the buildings.>>4461618Same as above, the sky's burned, so the stark contrast between the top and bottom of the tree is made even more stark.>>4461613I like the vertical reflections on the water, but the center is tragically uninteresting, there's no pattern, no shape, no coherence anywhere, it's just very random.>>4461610This is better in that regard, even though the reflections aren't as interesting anymore due to how close they are to the real object.>>4461609This is much the same as the first but without even the interesting reflections.>>4461520The clean and simple shapes and textures of the bottom and top left are in stark contrast with the shape of the light being blocked by a cloud, so imo it's a bit messy; simply lowering microcontrast/clarity/structure where the sun gets blocked would likely improve things.>>4461483Nice, though the light is harsh so a couple spots are burned, and the overshirt's strong beige doesn't fit very much with the blue and green parts of the reflections.>>4461464>>4461447These are both not as focused, the mannequin in blue isn't nicely framed by the scooter and the one in light beige is partially covered by someone completely unrelated.Also the vertical lines aren't vertical, they're like poor attempts at making pictures look like street photography.
>>4461422The pier begins just above the level of the horizon, drawing a step.The texture of the sea is continuous and fine enough, though the sky's full of unregular details, imo if you're looking to include something that complicated in a picture like this, the rest should be even more plain and simple, otherwise different but similar things (the sea and sky) having very different kinds of textures with very different levels of detail and frequency of details make the whole thing a lot less coherent.Also, you should use (better/more) lens correction, there's a lot of green and purple fringing around the two people.>>4461420The crow's not nearly separated enough from the rest of the scene, it doesn't get lost in the vegetation but it also doesn't stand out as it would if it didn't cover part of the leaves and had light blue space all around it.>>4461418A bit plain, the plants in the foreground prevent it from looking """minimalist""" and the couple of white splashes, especially the one right below the horizon on the coastline, change up the water's general texture without adding anything interest, I'd remove them in post.>>4461390A bit small, but an improvement in the sense that it makes the sky completely uniform at least.>>4461371Everything looks oddly green, the leaves are nice but the fence and horse are just odd.It's odd that what seems to be the subject isn't entirely in the frame.I think this would be better if it was the picture of a beetle rather than a picture of a farm with a bit of this and also a bit of a beetle from a low perspective.>>4461367>>4461366These are both worse than the squarer crops, the very bottom part might be removed to make everything in the frame seem in the distance, but cutting those clouds doesn't make anything better, it just removes details.>>4461356Shame about the girl who's in the middle but not exactly in the middle, and the legs of the structure are way too light compared to the rest.
>>4461863> Everything looks oddly greenMust be a Sony
my desk
>>4461965And some half frame bs
>>4459972Eww that banding
>>4461560Many such cases.
ffs I didn't even notice that heron when was shooting this.
>>4461966Looks good
Milling grains.
>>4462176peaceful place
uber noob, my first fast manual primei don't know where my focus is
>>4459943Who cares about old shit
>>4462213Who cares about your photos? Are they even worth remembering?
>>4462230> the retarded nophoto sperg reveals its final form.
>>4462194just the fact it was taken in japan makes it good
Got to meet some Australian royalty today. Nice bloke.
>>4459939taken yesterday on my terrible ancient camera that makes everything look like a 90's tv broadcast still
>>4462299and just this morning i figured out how to get a proper in focus windy photo of something small up closethe solutiontake 30 photos across 6 floppy disks and eventually one of them will come out in focus
>>4462242Are you talking about your post or mine?
>>4462299Haha looks just like my m43 camera.
bleh
>>4462408
>>4462409
>>4462411
>>4462412
>>4462413
>>4461333I hav a plane pic aswell
The thinker
>>4462423>I think...>Therefore...>*forgets place*>I think...>does this for several hours
>>4462425That describes Charles to a t but hes a nice/old cat
>>4462434GR3? Nice colours, but I second earlier on the shutter would have emphasized the guy pulling the cart a bit better.>>4462423The kittens will rise again, maan.>>4462422Nice. Its fire season here and I live close to an airport so we see several of these. Here's a chopper carrying a basket of water that I messed up the framing on.
>>4462465saved
>>4462441They rise after their 50 naps
>>4462468cheers bro, heres a horizontal one
How do you know if you suck at this shit or not? Just post pics around and have people talk shit?
>>4462762you suck and I won't tell you whyreal answer though posting pics here is a waste of time, people only do it because it's quick. If you wanna improve, read pic related and join a photo club around your area for constructive feedback
is this one and the one above any good? been trying for sunset pics a lot this summer
>>4462855yes it's one of the best pair i've seen in the past couple of years, keep going at it
>>4462762>How do you know if you suck at this shit or not?I don’t investigate this kind of unhelpful questions.>Just post pics around and have people talk shit?Listen to yourself as much as anyone else. What photos do you like? Answer that. Do you like your own photos? Why or why not? Answer that. What do you enjoy photographing? Answer that. Dialogue with yourself and be positive. No one can take your place in photography. You are valuable. Please keep contributing to the thread.
>>4462935Thanks!
How far are we from a camera able to to take photos on par to what we see with our eyes without needing post-processing?
>>4463064not the right thread for such philosophical questions
>>4463080dammit
>>4462949very friendly reply
Seething that the one picture I got where this prick was standing upright facing my direction and wasn't out of focus, wasn't blurry, and wasn't fucked up in some other way and I didn't get his god damn feet in the picture
Holiday snaps 1/3
>>4463086Is this barangay?
>>44631382/3 EOS 100D, Samyang 8mm, f3.5, ISO 1600 ,4x30s with long exposure noise reduction on (supposed to take and subtract a dark frame from shot), no dark or light frames.Never tried DeepSkyTraker before or how to edit the result.
>>44631383/2Utilitarian phone snap related to another hobby. A quartzite stone with pitchblende vein at 50s uranium ore exploration site. Couple magnitudes hotter than a Takumar 50mm/1.4.>>4463143 DeepSkyStaker, no tracking involved
First clear night since getting my R8 and 16-35 f/4 IS. This was just a test in my backyard with fucktonnes of light pollution, and my first time using Sequator so I don't fully understand optimal settings for it.But for 10 minutes of effort I'm super pleased.>10 frames, 1600 ISO, 10", f/4, @16mm
>mosiac decorations at a small train station made by a local schoolssome of these are hilariously spooky for some shit made by like 8 year olds
>>4463174
me on the right>>4463176forgot to say this one looks like a basedjak clown
>>4463292
>>4463175go back with a sheet of googly eyes
>>4463004Love it>>4462971Not your best, but quite good nevertheless>>4463086Every nook and cranny in this world looks comfy with half the population if today.
