The fate of /p/ as a community depends on ithttps://strawpoll.com/Qrgewx9XQyp"Winner" has to sell all their gear and use 1 body+1 prime valued <$1000 for a year. Git gud.
This guy got btfo in another thread and is now having a very leaky melty.
i'm going to keep using my z7ii and 24-70 f/4.
The top 2 are 0% surprising. Holy shit do you fags suck. If you can take good photos you dont bother showing them here or dont take credit because the only reason you two post is to show /p/ how nice you think your gear is. If you arent shit and post good shit why not take credit? Maybe to a narcissist, negative attention is the best attention of all…
>>4460249Sure looks like it.
>>4460246>have to pick 3but the only one I want to pick is (you)
>>4460254I enjoy photography, sharing my work and enjoy talking about film photography with the film bros. It's really that simple, and anything else is just weird/angry projecting of your own insecurities onto me. Go look in the current or previous fgt to see the truth.I don't post to show off my gear. I post to show and discuss my work. In reality there's no right or wrong format to use. Some formats are just better at certain things than others.>>4460255I feel second hand embarrassment for the poor guy.
make sure you check the results for what people have voted for other so you too can vote on "Anyone who uses SNOY"t. voted for Anyone who uses SNOY (and doghair)>>4460257fuck off m43 hating tonality schizo. your dog snapshits suck. git gud.
>>4460256He absolutely and unequivocally refuses to post any of his work, which would be the only real way to btfo anyone in his strawpoll. I'm thinking you're right on the money about that one.
How the fuck is Sugar not n1?Hes a nice guy but by far the forst namefag photography wiseAlso I can't for the life of me differenciate between the dog postersAll I know is that the one posting his 8x10 on fgt is chill and does pretty cool dog photos
Who is rentalfag? Why put Dollpedo? he's getting glazed a lotAlso where is cAnon?
who are the 3 people who didnt vote doghair?>doghair>huskymolester>doghair on a proxythe fact that this poll is not ranked1: doghair2: sugar3: huskymolesteris proof someone is fucking around
>>4460263I voted Sugar and then the corgi anon, don't remember who I voted for last
>>4460262Option not allowed))
damn i fucking love niche plebbit drama on muh obscure photography forum
>>4460266You sly fox.
OP post some of your work. Let's see how much better you are than all the people in your poll.>>4460263Obviously the OP that is having an extreme meltdown is going to cheat and then lie to himself and everyone that it wasn't him.
>>4460268This guy has been obsessed with me for multiple years now. It mostly stems from simple disagreements. He is mentally ill and has never posted a single picture on /p/. Check out this thread to see him get btfo so hard he had a multi thread meltdown >>4460247
I voted@Anyone who uses SNOY 2025!
>there are ~20 people on /p/knew itdead board
>>4460260I like sugar because I've came across his build threads on grassrootsmotorsports so even though he's a fag on /p/ he's better outside of itHuskyfag is funny at least even if all he does is take dog snaps with a $5,000 medium format camera
>>446028410 of the votes are from OP.
>>4460285Would drink a beer with the guy/10But he has the worst photos out of the namefags, even tho they rarely post any photos at all and sugar is a fine contributor of photos.Uuugh maybe I should retract my sugar vote, at least the guy posts photos
>>4460288>t. #1
>>4460285Wasn't huskyfag the one who wouldn't shut up about women rapping dogs in gear thread.
>>4460284OP is dead set on ruining it too.
>>4460293That was cinefag. Then he threw an all caps spammy rage fit because he thought bestiality=rape was "lies"
>>4460294To be frank we wouldnt have a problem without doghair. Removing the eternal bait taker is the only way to kill interest in the fishing hole.
>>4460296Your cope is awfully powerful. The freakish nophoto that made this thread took my bait and had a nuclear level meltdown.
>>4460295Oh lol. There's so many dog posters here it's hard to keep track
>>4460299What do you expect? 4chan is and has always been a dog website.
The amount of people confusing all the dog posters really demonstrates how little anyone actually cares.
>>4460301I thought the cat people won?
>>4460307Not really, no. You know OP chickened out of an egg photograph competition? I told him I would stop posting if he could take a better egg photograph than me. You should have heard all the excuses he was making. It was wonderful.
Only 4th? You guys can do better than that.I still daily drive a body and prime <1000 dollars so even if I win nothing changes lol
>dollpedowhich one of us, fag
>>4460309I paid less than a grand for my 8x10 kit + lens because I got a unbelievably good deal on it + 3 lenses and accessories, so it wouldn't change anything for me either. Lol. He had one chance and screwed it up.
>>4460313NGL I'm jelly, local camera shop had a ton of LF shit came in and like 20 Graphic View 4x5's I took all the best parts from them for spares for my GV, even got the good rotating back with built-in sun shade so I don't have to carry a sheet anymore.I have less than 500 into my LF kit with two Schneider lenses in Copal shutters with modern coatings, OP had one job
>>4460316We will continue having fun with the cameras of our choice. It is really that simple!Sometimes people will sell LF kits for pennies on ebay. You just need to know what youre looking at and take a bit of risk, as you probably already know.Lens pictured, which sells for 4k-5k used was basically free depending on how you do the math with everything else in the lot. 210mm super angulon with 500mm of projection. It is a behemoth.
>>4460320Ok but enough derailing already. We need to gossip about our very own anonymous celebrity drama
Another trick for getting inexpensive large format lenses is to invest in one of these Sinar copal shutter accessories. You can see it behind the lens. Lenses mounted to sinar DB boards are usually 20-40% cheaper than if they had a shutter of their own. You can also mount old vintage brass body lenses with extreme ease. It's an investment, but if you know you'll be doing a lot of LF stuff it may be worthwhile.The only drawback aside from expense is they only go up to 1/60th of a second, BUT it also goes up to 8 seconds, which can be very handy.>>4460322BORING. Post some of your large format film gear or pics. I posted my latest 8x10 egg shot in fgt. Go tell me how much you hate it.
>>4460320I have one of those 70-200's on my bench right now for a bad IS system and it's the cable that runs down to the lens mount to attach to the contacts that connect to the body and I can't find them ANYWHERE. Canon doesn't even sell them you have to buy the whole god damn IS assembly and I don't wanna.I wanna do 8x10 so bad but being able to carry 20 film holders in my bag while hiking Utah and without dying is nice.
I added a white border to my egg photo just for you guys. It kinda looks like a woman wearing a dress. >>4460324I have a deardorff 8x10 and the pack + tripod ended up weighing around 45lbs with 3 film holders and 2 lenses. That much weight gets old pretty fast... My advice would be to convince someone or rent a pack mule to carry a backpack with all your film in it. You could maybe bring a changing bag to swap new film in the field, but it would be quite risky. Anything less than one of the extremely expensive ultralight 8x10 field cameras is going to be quite heavy.8x10 is definitely worth it if you make contact prints, want 8x10 slides to look, or have a crazy scanner. If I didn't make prints I would probably shoot more 4x5.
gay drama threadcurse you for perpetuating petty controversies instead of making a photo thread
I'd like to thank the two people who voted for me even if one capitalized the c
too obviously bottedi will now rig your poll
>>4460342>>4460343>obviously the same place as "blurry ebil doger in the keys"Stop raping her, cinefag
>>4460343Welcome to the party. Post some egg shots if you gottem.
>>4460345i'm not that dogfucker cinefraud dumbfuck. that's not even the keys, that's north idaho. fuck you for interrupting my poll rigging.
>>4460347>2 minutes apartnot buying it cinefag
>>4460349>>4460347Meds>>4460347I don't fuck dogs, I just said they could use muds as their fuck meat as a means of eugenics.
Sony A7Cr chad checking in. Thank you for your support in the polls!
i paid a brazilian $3.50 to do thisi hope you're happy>>4460350silence dogfucker
>>4460352Wow nice.
>>4460352lmfao
>>4460352Now the real question is what are your thoughts on 3d pop?
>>4460352F A T A L I T Ycaptcha: GGJ00
>>4460360He is mossad if you didnt know.
>>4460352Thanks for confirming what we all knew - the inorganic Sony hate is from one glownigger with access to a south american botnet.
>>4460363Gotem. Checkmate.
>>4460352that's a big poll
>>4460363In fairness when I voted before the brazil-assist, snoy hate was still only trailing a lead by a 10 or so votes
>>4460369Yes, because it had one vote, yours, and every other category had 10 or so votes.
>>4460363don't worry anon i voted for sony hate before it was botted
>>4460246Am I the A7r Scanner in this scenario? I'm so pleased I trigger the zoophiles sufficiently to warrant a vote, given I only post once or twice a month...
>be honest>post tons of my photos>post even more relevant examples photos>encourage others to post photosNo wonder /p/ hates me
>>4460246Lame to omit cANON / cinefag who ruin the board more than anyone else
>Sugar most hated tripLol checks out. Insufferable obese redditor.
>>4460422xir this is a gear board
>OP is trying to re-rig the poll in their favor after getting btfotake the L. all strawpolls are fake.>>4460423>>4460420I think this incident is self explanatory and the selections are not coincidences, nor do they have anything to do with photography. This is a gear thread.Doghair made fun of m4turds for being jealous of his big sensors and the m4turds got extremely mad at him over itSugar and huskychad both photo dumped on micro four turd gear threads."Even a snoy is better than micro four turds" "Any camera is good as long as it isn't a sony or m43" - actual huskychad quotesCanon RP user bought a full frame and upgraded to an even nicer full frame (the bastard!)Dollpedo shoots 4x5 which triggers mfturdsa7r scanner shoots full frame film, and then scans it on full frame again instead of using an olympus, humiliating micro for sissiesCorgifag recently announced that he sold all of his crop sensor gear because it was uselessAll of these names are just posters that remind micro four turds shills of their inferiority. If you thought sugar's "stop acting like owning a leica isnt a big deal" melty was funny, imagine someone experiencing even higher levels of poorfag cope on an entire board of people who act like owning a 35mm+ sensor isn't just not a big deal, it's the bare minimum.cANON was definitely not going to be on there because cANON praises micro four turds for its "pixel pitch reach" and fervently defends equivalence cope to the point of claiming dpreview screenshots are faked because the mfturds and ffs are both shot at f5.6 (he doesnt actually know how cameras work)Also, we found out huskychad is a jewish fed with access to south american botnets.
>>4460432>random middle-aged brazilanon paid the equivalent of six weeks wages to rig a poll>south american botnetwhere is the lie
>>4460432It's always about gear and trying to control people. OP is one angry little dude.
>>4460432>Corgifag recently announced that he sold all of his crop sensor gear because it was uselessI sold like half my total gear, which included several FF lenses, and I even bought one aps-c lens recentlyFF is better though, and more practical than crop MF tooOnly owned one m43 body, the og E-P1, but even then I opted for 1" more often
>>4460423sure, but the poll was about worst photographers. they do not take photos
>>4460464>Only owned one m43 body, the og E-P1, but even then I opted for 1" more oftenNow the m4turds will hate you even more
Whoever made all these chad memes is a comedic genius
>>4460466That's totally fine. My heuristic is basically just how many "memorable" photos I can recall from using them.For the E-P1, I can honestly only recall one image. Between RX100's and my V1, lot more images. Some of the images on my big giant everything collage are 1" too.
>>4460467
>>4460470It would be better if peter was using a view camera, but still funny.
>>44604752015-2019 m43 general archives are a gold mine
>>4460478I kek’d
>>4460478Hang on a minute hear me out, what about APS-C shit like the D500? D500 is basically a D4 or D5 but APS-C and in a smaller format.I could have absolutely used one of those at Speedweek panning 300mph cruise missiles at f/16 with a 200-500 VR
>>4460489The D500 was a hack. It was what you had to use in the day if you couldn't afford the crazy lenses and flex your wealth "like chad".These days, it's never coming back because the Z7II/Z8 are secretly D500s.
>>4460494>20mp dx>10fps+>fake autofocus performance boost by just shrinking the framesmart
>>4460494Wasn't the D500 the birding camera of choice?
>>4460422It's from the anger that comes from not being able to control you and the resulting jealousy. Really gross and immature stuff. The thread and interaction that spawned this thread prove it without a doubt. There are people that spend their lives here, but hate photography. Keep posting your work, encouraging people to post theirs, and laugh in the face of the nasty photography haters.
>>4460517They are mad because his sensor is bigger than theirs>>4460508What, can't afford an 800mm f5.6 on full frame? "Have to" settle for a 500mm on a d500?>"$11,500 is too much for me" - losers and fags
>>4460464>FF is better>I prefer 1" to m43Buddy you just made enemies for life with the m43 community. They are going to find your house and order you extra large pizzas with "size matters" written in pepperoni, forever.
>>4460246Uh.. our response schizosisters??
>>4460563>after huskyfag blatantly admits to paying brazilians to rig the pollwho would winsome autistic israeli who economically exploits south americansnormal people who use and enjoy sony cameras
>>4460556It has to be something unrelated to my actual photography. I get that my still life studies are boring to some, but I find them very pretty and theyre so fun to make and even more fun to print.My angriest trolls constantly scream at me about practicing and that's exactly what I'm doing. Sorry Im doing exactly what you asked me to do, dummies!Terrible photos are executed poorly and have no thought or quality to them. I carefully compose, frame, and light most of my photographs. Small flaws in an otherwise good to great photo do not make them terrible.
>>4460568They are mad because your sensor is too big. It can be nothing else.
>>4460573Is this box of slide film really the ultimate troll? Or would you say that my mfdb is more powerful?
>>4460566Autistic Israeli because Snoyboys are that fucking obnoxious you're not normal people
>>4460566>snoy schizo>normal people
>>4460563that anon absolutely BTFO Hahaha
>>4460475right looks like m43 too
>>4460563Everyone I work with has stopped using sony for stills. Some still use their video camera like the fx30 but for still they're just not worth it anymore. They don't have any advantages over competitors. The sony colours meme is very real in industries where accurate colours matter.
>>4460774I've talked to a couple wedding photographers who have stopped using sony too. The Z8 does everything they wanted for cheaper and they don't have to retouch the sony colors out of their shitty jpegs they deliver. Sony is even too soulless for wedding photographers now lol
>>4460820Unfortunately the colour issues are not limited to jpeg. The raws are bad too. Fixable, but bad. And having to do so is a huge waste of time. I think it wouldn't be too bad for weddings but I'd rather use just about anything else.
Show yourself faggot
>>4460824>>4460820>>4460774My dad works for vogue and he says everyone uses sony because nikon has the worst color science and canons always breakThe only people leaving sony are shill youtubers who stopped getting free shit after double dipping with panasonic (ONLY shills use panasonic. its very sad.)
>>4460864
>>4460881>le white balance faecget new material
>>4460909>bad auto white balance>but its just the white balance!!????
>>4460913>bad auto white balance>its just one video>free review copies>no way do people ever lieIt's just one video, all the others are about the a7iii and older, and it's too expected so I think she purposefully set the white balance wrong. Panasonic is known for telling reviewers to lie if they want to keep getting new gear to review and all the perks/trips.
>>4460923meds
>>4460926If it was a real problem you'd have more than one easily faked video with close ties to the brand gerald undone confirmed curates all of their influencer reviews.
>>4460927Sony is so fake you can't even trust the time their clocks display without hacking some honesty into them.
>>4460853based alex booger is a shit cliche photographer
>>4460881It started out being funny then got to be annoying spam. I think it's back to funny now lol
>>4460927I mean there's a lot of posts just Google Sony bad color science and you'll see. Or maybe not. You might be one of those spec sheet photographers...
>>4460999>/p/ mentions the bad snoy color science>reee doesnt count because theres only 2 posters here!!!>videos on youtube about the bad snoy color science>reeee doesnt count because youtube is slop!!!
>>4460999>>4461003Explains why Sony is never ever used professionallyToo bad for all the examples online we only end up with the same one posted over and overWe also never see examples of bad color from other brands posted, despite also having plenty of examplesPeople here still can't identify Sony if any editing is done either
>>4460999>google sony bad color science>every result is a retard nocamera asking if the propaganda is real, 3d pop tier morons, and children with a7iiis having AWB issues in scenes with zero white>google moon landing faked>every result is a retard as wellNext googleNikon green tintNikon green skinNikon raw colors green>>4461080Gearfags dont know how cameras work. The default profile in their raw editor is totally the real "color science" and changing jpeg settings in camera is also cheating. Unless you change white balance to misrepresent sony.
>>4461080Youtube said shooting jpeg is cool and computers are hard so i have to buy a panasonic and sony is INVALID, okI have to spend hours downloading luts and changing camera settings instead of editing. Sony colors are bad because id have to spend hours downloading luts and changing camera settings and pirating Lightroom
Can't believe >>4460566 claimed Sony users are normal people when I gotta read this fucking autistic diarrhea
>>4461092Not an argument
>>4461089Very true, I vividly remember ~10-15 years ago, it was Nikon green vs Canon red
>>4461003>>4461080>>44610893 cope replies. It's okay I forgive you. Just remember to forgive yourself once you pull the trigger on selling your Sony gear. We all learn from our mistakes.
>>4461150Only /p/ hates sony this much. Well, /p/, mu-43 (shills). and some failures like "camera conspiracies" (talentless gearfag vlogger).Everyone else likes it lol
Another nophoto thread devolves into gearfagging and consolewars. These people hate photography.
>>4461150I sold my Sony stuff years ago, still think they make some of the best gear
>>4461164It's rather well established by now that OP is a seething foolturder and his "worst photographers" list is just a list of everyone that pissed off the /m43/ gearthread cult. They are still mad about their nophoto chart general dying.Which is why this thread turned into the /m43/ national pasttime, sony hate schizophrenia
>>4461168And the most pathetic part about it is, OP went back and kept botting the poll to bring up the usual two people, long after everyone stopped giving a fuck, just because they were the last ones to make fun of foolturdershttps://strawpoll.com/Qrgewx9XQyp/resultsI just checked because I had a feeling they would. lmao.
>>4461170>>4461168The size of the film makes the foolturder seethe.
>>4461189eggquisite
>>4460301Nope, it's catsWe've never had dogurday, but every week is Caturday
>>4461207Caturday is a dead meme that lives on via reddit. Most 4chan users prefer dogs as pets and cats as memes.
>>4461152Most of the other people are either best buy shoppers or brand ambassadors. If I had a lobotomy or was paid to use Sony I would like them too. If i'm going to spend my money on a camera though I want something without a bunch of compromises and a cope mount.
>>4461232I like compromises, but only when I get better image quality in return.
>>4461152>Everyone else likes it lol
>>4461232>I'm an autistic nerd and it's not good enough for methe funniest thing about "sony is soulless" is the people who hate sony are actually the most soulless nerds on earth and 70% of sony users are clueless normies who just want to be creative
At risk of being trolled, hear me out.I LOVE my Sony A7c, it lets me get away with shit my DSLRs couldn't do. This shot, yeah I could have done it on DSLR, but not while standing up straight, and not looking through the finder, and not with a Russar 20mm lens that sits at hyperfocal distance the whole time no matter what f-stop I set it to and is the size of the factory Sony body cap.Would I daily drive one? Probably not, I bought this thing for lens repairs and to verify my work which it does exceptionally well, and all of the cool shit you can do with it because of its size, can be done with any mirrorless on the market now. If I had to buy one, it would be the Zf.Is all of the hate on /p/ for Sony justified? Absolutely, it's for the lulz and people get derriere-distraught over it ad that makes my pp hard.
>>4461260>skin tones not greeneven sugar is better at using a sony than the rest of /p/
>>4461268It's not hard! >load in lightroom>choose all Sony photos>tint +2>sync settings>confirmshit ain't rocket science
>>4461170Meds.
>>4461253lol your talking about sony shooters like they are noble savages. They are just retarded
>>4461260I legitimately wouldn't hate Sony if it wasn't for the brand ambassadors who trash you for not taking a photo on anything short of a a7rv with a gay master zeiss lens. It's like the /v/ console war Playstation fanboys were laid off and the ones that weren't were given new assignments on /p/They're good cameras but not my preference.
>>4461395It really is the sony shooters that make them insufferable. Their cameras have some quirks and sometimes the forced vignetting gets on my nerves but it's mostly people talking about Sony online that annoys me. I was considering getting an A7Cii but the sony chuds here really put me off.
