Ok now dust has settled. What's the best ratio?protip:645
>>44603256x6 you unwashed nigger
>>44603254:5 of course.
>>44603251:2.35
2.35:1That's the first step towards distilled kino.
>>4460334A further distillation brings you some J&B into the picture.
What a minx Pfeiffer was
>>4460333>1:2.35>>4460334>2.35:1>Shit at portrait, shit at object photography, good for nothing but very few landscapes and goyims projection cave i.e theater.>It's KINO BRUUUHHHKeep your heads warmed up within your beanies
>>44603251:1
>>4460327>>4460434yes
>>4460325I like4:5 for vertical outputs3:2 for horizontal outputs4:3 to actually shoot on
>>4460325>>4460333645 and 6x6 are not ratios you brainless idiots
>>4460327Honestly, if we're going to talk about fucking niggers, this is the way to do it.Fuck all of you niggers. Square format is best format.Why?Because fuck you, nigger, that's why.You want to give me 3:2? Go fuck yourself, if I want 2:3, I have to ROTATE my camera??????????????No.I'd rather crop from a square capture. Especially if any post-rotation is required (skydiving photo, safari, anything you can't autistic tripod bubble level before shooting, etc).3:2 is a copium ratio made for "muh efficiency" back in the film days when the extra 50% height to deliver square would cost more PHYSICAL MATERIAL per photo. Everything should be 1:1 ratio now, without exception.Most importantly EVERY smartphone should shoot 1:1 photos and videos. Tiny sensor, you should make the most of it.The fact most people can't seem to figure out whether they want to shoot vertical or horizontal means 1:1 would be ideal. Best of both, crop how you want later.Optics produce circles.Humans make squares.One could argue hexagonal sensors might be based, and closer/more efficient to matching circles, but have fun trying to digitally deal with that shit. No. Fuck off.Give us squares.Make photography great again.Embrace 1:1 aspect ratio for the capturing medium.Every argument in favor of anything that is NOT a 1:1 square is just someone coping and shilling for degeneracy.
>>4460336If this were 1:1 aspect ratio, we'd see her feet.>>4460337If this were 1:1 aspect ratio, we'd see her butt cheeks.>>4460334If this were 1:1 aspect ratio, we'd see her tits.>>4460425If this were 1:1 aspect ratio, we'd see the migrant about to commit the crime just out of frame.
4:3 all day everyday.
>>4460325It doesn't matterJust don't be a megapixellet and you can use any ratio you want
>>4460642Chad mode > activated.
>>4460327That would be 1:1
