Is digitally manipulating a photo a valid form of artistic expression? How does it differ in post production from other types of manipulation?
>>4465067Of course it is. In many ways it can be more artistic than pure photography.
>>4465067Holy kino. Whatever works, works. Art is total freedom. Do whatever you want. Post moar
>>4465092Thanks. Here’s a doctored selfie.
>>4465067Lynchian but not in a good way (remember the drawer knob?)
>>4465308I was actually going for this aesthetic from the Twin Peaks The Return
>>4465365Checkout early surreal photography from france.
>>4465369This is cool
This is all hideous.
>>4465409Show me better, cunt.
>>4465067>Is digitally manipulating a photo a valid form of artistic expression?Sure>Is digital manipulation photography?No. It's graphic arts. Starting with a photo doesn't make graphic arts photography.>>4465071>Digital manipulation can be more artistic than pure photography.Wrong. It art one medium does not negate another. Art is art regardless of medium.
>>4465453>Is digital manipulation photography?>No. It's graphic arts.Lmao, fuck off you straight poographer. Pictorialism has solved this a century ago.
>>4465453Poor fella doesn't know what can means.
>>4465455>>4465458>insufferably poor reading comprehension>clearly lacking artistic educationShameful. Posts disregarded.
>>4465459>no uAt least you're based. A based retard, but still based.
>>4465420nothing is better.
>>4465679
>>4465679kino
>>4465716Thanks. Here's another one I tried with the smudge tool.
>>4470263art
>>4470264Thanks.
