[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>new camera for $99
>better build and image quality than $600 Pentax 17
>>
File: 1355427097129.jpg (46 KB, 398x323)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>better build and image quality than $1600 Fuji X-half
>>
>find cheap industrial sensor
>do some calibrations measurements
>create some film simulations
>apply shitty plastic lens
>profit
why does nobody do this?
>>
fuji would be retarded to not straight up target this segment at under 200 dollars
>>
>>4470096
What is this meme of the Pentax 17 ring poorly built? It uses composite materials but it’s actually very solidly and well built. Using plastics doesn’t mean it’s poorly built. I have no concerns about knocking mine about on the daily.
>>
>>4470101
Kodak blind bag cameras.
>>
>>4470096
buy an ad faggot



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.