[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 000001680019 2.jpg (729 KB, 1565x1038)
729 KB
729 KB JPG
Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
Previous thread: >>4464845

I just copied and pasted the old OP because no one would bake a new bread

Thread Question: What is the advantage of darkroom printing?
>>
File: 000099580025.jpg (4.84 MB, 3130x2075)
4.84 MB
4.84 MB JPG
Traded some shrooms for a crappy point and shoot in Kyrgyzstan. Here are some photos
>>
File: 000099580009.jpg (4.91 MB, 3130x2075)
4.91 MB
4.91 MB JPG
>>
File: 000099580002.jpg (4.86 MB, 3130x2075)
4.86 MB
4.86 MB JPG
>>
File: 000099580023.jpg (4.93 MB, 3130x2075)
4.93 MB
4.93 MB JPG
>>
File: 000099580027.jpg (4.94 MB, 3130x2075)
4.94 MB
4.94 MB JPG
>>
new film point and shoot what do i think of it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-E_shfVzlk
>>
>>4471648
>point and shoot
I don't care.
>>
>>4471648
>plastic chinkshit
what do you think
>>4471602
cool shit
>>
>>4471648
What the fuck are those YouTube comments this is basically a run of the mill late 90s early 2000s snapshitter you could get for fifty bucks, am I really that out of touch? This is trash.
>>
>>4471648
Looks gigantic for a p&s when they should be pocketable
I scrubbed through the video and they didn't have any photos either so I'm gonna say it'll be shit
>>
>>4471595
You made London actually look like a nice place there, so I have to at least hand that to you.
>>
File: IMG_3006.jpg (1.24 MB, 1206x1717)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
>>4471648
Zoomers always trying to reinvent the wheel and thinking they’re such fucking geniuses for it is a weird trend.
>>
Fuck you jobo for being so expensive. Anyone have experience with their film processors?
>>
File: 000007120023.jpg (649 KB, 1512x1003)
649 KB
649 KB JPG
>>4471668
London is one of the most beautiful cities on Earth mate. Isn't hard.
>>
File: file.png (651 KB, 810x985)
651 KB
651 KB PNG
we are so fucking back
https://www.instagram.com/p/DPRHtyQjenU/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
the most important thing is that this is actually branded by Kodak Eastman which produces all films and not by Alaris. Which means Eastman invests in film R&D
>>
>>4471884
>1st pic is a dog
Oh fuck they hired a 4channer
>>
>>4471884
>These films are sub-brands of existing Kodak films
What did they mean by this?
>>
>>4471919
That they are packing existing emulsion with old names and not giving alaris a cent
so based
>>4471829
travel more
>>
>>4471919
People are assuming that Kodacolor 100 is either ProImage or GA100 (Lomo 100). 200 is just ColorPlus.
>>
>>4471931
Ok maybe I don’t understand the fuck I was with Alaric’s and the licensing, where does gold fit into this? It’s also 200 and it’s widely believed Fuji repackages gold for their 200. What a tangled web lol
>>
>>4471931
>>4471938
Kodacolor 100 its a gamble, but the 200 surely is going to be Colorplus
>>4471938
To my understanding, Alaris are the only ones with the rights to sell consumer films that were avialable after 2013 or so. BUT Eastman the manufacturer can sell film to whoever they want just not use the commercial names, so that is why Fuji is repacking their shit, Lomo does the same, etc.

In this case since they weren't using Kodacolor brand at the time its outside this arrangement and they can start selling it again, no matter what emulsion they are using lmao
>>
>>4471595
Do you guys do any post processing on Lightroom or DT? 99% of my shots are unedited after scan
>>
Feel free to laugh at me, but: Do you advance your film right before taking a shot or after each shot so it's ready for the next?
It's something I've never questioned for some reason (quite new to film, been shooting for less than a year). I though that maybe if I cock the shutter preemptively after each shot, it might go off accidentally and also I thought that maybe keeping it cocked for a long time between shots would put additional mechanical stress on some mechanisms or something.
But I recently saw someone who always advanced the film right after taking a pic
>>
>>4471946
Of course.
>>
>>4471946
I don't do my scans myself and they usually come out of the lab just fine. I think if I did my own scans I might do a little bit of color tweaking.
Though just being content with what I get is part of what makes film photography so relaxing to me. Whenever I want to go heavy on the editing I shoot digital
>>
>>4471921
>travel more
lol
I guarantee I've been to more countries and more cities than you have. There are streets in London which nobody goes down which would be the main attraction in many other cities around the world. Its variety and age of its architecture and quantity of it is unparalleled.
>>
>>4471948
This made me want to check my camera and it is indeed cocked. I never thought about it but I guess its just habit. You always want to be as ready as possible when taking a photo and I think i've missed out on a lot of good photos because I didn't realise my camera wasn't cocked and I went to shoot and lost that decisive second
>>
>>4471977
>his camera has a cock
lmao
>>
File: IMG21118.jpg (701 KB, 960x1200)
701 KB
701 KB JPG
>>4471948
>advance your film right before taking a shot or after each shot so it's ready for the next?
heh, not something I have to think about
because I don't have a choice
>>
>>4471948
for me its as simple as abc
always be cocked
>>
>>4471992
Can you do that in another thread pls
>>
File: r u cocked.jpg (755 KB, 1474x2091)
755 KB
755 KB JPG
>>4471948
>Excuse me young blood, are you cocked?
y-yes?
>A'ight, you have a good night then
y-you too
>>
>>4471884
Photos don't look very exciting. Why don't they just remake Kodachrome??
>>
>>4472069
Because it's a lost formula.
>>
>>4472069
Because like herpes, developing it is a real bitch.
>>
>>4472012
He looked like a monkey in the thumbnal wtf
>>
File: Untitled 1.jpg (1.31 MB, 2838x2167)
1.31 MB
1.31 MB JPG
8x10 slide film, e100vs. My first shot. Controlling contrast and calculating exposure for this scene was pretty tricky.
Pretty cool to look at in person. I tried cleaning up the color cast and making the scan look like the slide.
>>
>>4472180
And of course the color looks totally different on 4chan than it does on C1. Reee
>>
>>4472181
Proof and export in srgb and accept that 4chan strips color metadata so c1/local software, gimp, photoshop, chrome, brave, firefox, and safari will all render differently and the 4chan upload and ctrl+o view in browser will most likely differ as well.
>>
>>4472186
Thank you. I will try that with the next one.
>>
File: 000403220016.jpg (3.01 MB, 3024x2005)
3.01 MB
3.01 MB JPG
>go to camera store
>ask for kodakcolor
>guy gets mad
>overcharges me for portra


support your local business :^)
>>
File: Untitled (41).jpg (1.15 MB, 2225x1769)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
>>4472180
>>
>>4472193
>Nudity storage
What did they mean by this?
>>
>>4472193
fuck filmlabs
in my country I buy film only in online shops. Films are ridiculously overpriced in filmlabs, foma shit costs like 2 times more than in the internet or bulk-rolled.
Also shit and expensive scans (I scan or print myself so not a problem for me)
>>
OKAY SO IS IT PRO IMAGE OR VR???
>>
>>4472236
someone on r*ddit shot Kodacolor 100 with good scans and it doesn't look like proimage so maybe VR
still it doesn't mean shit until someone makes good tests
>>
>>4471948
your instinct is correct, COCKing your shutter puts pressure on the springs, the elasticity of the springs degrades over time but this is very much accelerated if you keep them in that high-pressure state out of rest, they'll lose their ability to return to rest, so definitely don't store your camera with the shutter COCKed and maintain the good habit of only COCKing when ready to focus and fire



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.