I actually really like the aesthetic of high ISO photos.
>>4471649im starting to like higher iso more mostly because the additional grain gives it texture.
>>4471660Yeah
>>4471660No
>>4471649Looks like dookie compared to film grain, but Im glad you've found a look you enjoy. Maybe add a little contrast or something to mitigate the washed out look you get on left.
>>4471660>>4471663only Fujifilm X-Trans has good digital grain because it's mostly luminance noise as opposed to C(uck)MOS sensors and their shit colored chroma noise
>>4471819This. Thats why Fuii is number 1.
>>4471660Just be a man and shoot film if you want grain, there’s an entire art to it.
>>4471819>digital grainNot a thing home slice. It's called noise and it's uggo most of the time and passable at the best of times.Zoomers coping by saying "look at muh digital grain" because they want the look of film without actually shooting film.
I once shot at ISO 32000. I didn't like it very much.
>>4471663>>4472058>>4472077i don't like film grain though
Me 2. Been fucking around with higher iso shots on my xtranny sensors and its a nice look>just shoot filmOne day when I have money to burn getting two good pictures from a roll sure
