Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?
What is /p/'s opinion?
Cum on, don't be shy
>>4474453As if any porn addict cares for skin tones
>>4474458/thread
>>4474453actually intersting in another way: how does one light porn. full frontal no shadows soft lighting seems amateur. three point setup does hide too much and is too moody i would argue.
>>4474455>hair like and old hag that just wake up>dress them in sailor uniformsWhat did they mean by this
>>4474559What were the '90s, you zoomie retard?
>>4474454Not sure if I have a weirdly short tongue or what, but this looks bizarre
>>4474517all depends on the style of your video. The light bar things used by ryan madison seem to be good.
I noticed this too the other day while looking at some german vhs tape boxes...
>>4476045>implying VHS is film
>>4476055No, but photos used on cover box of VHS tapes were shot on film.
>>4474453I can imagine that "the industry" would rather switch to HDR or render the same film in multiple color gradings. Like you get a little option if you want the film to look "lifelike", "vibrant" or "retro"
yeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0
