[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


Which do you think is more useful for Architecture photography - a Panoramic tripod head? Or A Tilt Shift lens?
>>
>>4477015
What are you poor or something? Just get both.
>>
>>4477015
>Tilt Shift lens
With a ballhead that has a level ...

Honestly there's only three types of tripod heads that are needed, a fluid head, gimbal head, and ballhead.
Spend money on a good one of either and you're set.
>>
>>4477071
Unless you're shooting panoramas. In which case they're completely useless because you get parallax problems.
>>
>>4477073
>panoramas
Then you whip out the gimbal or fluid head something more fixed, on one axis while more nimble on the other.

For general architecture a ballhead is perfect.
>>
>>4477078
I feel like you don't understand what parallax is
>>
>>4477073
>et parallax problems.
i'm sure you could get some kind of nodal point adapter for a ballhead rather than a whole separate head. but if you can just have multiple types without issue that's fine too i suppose.
>>
>>4477093
He just uses a macro rail
https://youtu.be/aka7HhOMIBg
>>
>>4477015
if you're going to use a tilt shift lens, why not just use a large-format camera?
>>
>>4477015
Tilt shift. We use the tilt shift every day. Never once needed the pano head. Ball heads suck. Geared micro-adjust head ftw.

Nothing like loosening one clamp and having to adjust all three axes at once bc the fucking camera is just flailing around freely on a ball.
>>
>>4480477
Because clients do not appreciate 1, the artistry of film & 2, the extra time required to develop olde timey artistry of film.
>>
>>4477093
As strictly hobbyist,
Get whatever lenses you need. If you need to shoot parallel vertical lines you need either a (tilt-)shift or a bit wider lens and some extra megapickles for doing it in post.
Also whatever heads you need. If you do not shoot panoramas or ball panoramas you do not need a panorama head. But doing it without is bit fiddly and easy to mess up. Ball panorama much more so.
>>
>>4480477
>if you're going to use a tilt shift lens, why not just use a large-format camera?

If you're going to fly in a plane why don't you just go in a hot air balloon?
>>
Can you combine a panoramic tripod head with a tilt Shift lens? Or does that just fuck everything up?
>>
>>4480477
no one who has ever shot with a large format camera would pose this question
>>
Aside from using a tilt-shift to correct lines, could they also be used for more stylistic purposes during regular use (not talking about the miniature focus effect)?
>>
>>4480562
If you shoot for example a panorama of a public square surrounded by high rise buildings, having both could be a good idea.
>>4480961
For example point camera upwards, shift to get subject in frame & make perspective worse and tilt to adjust plane of focus so everything is on focus and and your subject has really tiny head & really fat legs. (Or something like that, I haven't tried.)
>>
>>4480961
You can use them to stretch perspectives
>>
>>4481433
Neat.
It's fucked that all the first-party canon tilt-shifts are like several thousand dollars and like 3x the delta of a roughly similar non tilt-shift (that also has AF and often IS). I kind of want one for architectural photography.
>>
>>4481438
I sold mine a while back to fund a super telephoto lens, and I miss it a lot. I might save up and get a second hand one again. It adds a lot of fun to photography.
>>
>>4481438
Tilt-shift lens needs bigger good quality image circle than not-ts of same focal length, using movements move the frame off the optical axis of lens. That, mechanics and low demand add the cost up.

Samyang has less expensive tilt-shift lenses. Also medium format lens to dslr/mirrorless tilt-shift adapters exist (dunno how $$$ wide angle medium format lenses are). If you want a toy Lensbaby may still be a thing.

I've only used large format camera movements myself.asjhy
>>
File: IMG_3273.jpg (924 KB, 1534x1731)
924 KB
924 KB JPG
get one of these bad boys. put a dslr or mirrorrless on the back and whataver lens you want on the front. i used several ts lenses and adaptors but they simply dont compare.
>>
>>4484809
With this setup you can’t use shorter lens than 80mm. You will need digital back to use shorter lenses
>>
>>4484919
i forgot about that. im acurakly using mamiya 645 macro lenses on mine.

https://www.captureintegration.com/cambo-actus-lens-compatibility-table/
>>
>>4480961
I shoot arch. I mostly use the tilt-shit when shooting things that are going to need to be tiled, like a huge vertical panel in an atrium yesterday I couldn't shoot any other way. If I have to stitch images together, they're getting shot on the TS. It eliminates the risk of time wasted dicking around with failed pano merges and other artifacts of trying to do it in post.

Most things you can correct in-camera, you should. Just shoot it right the first time.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.