>Same as M11>Only difference is EV1 has an EVF(same with Q3, SL3) instead of Optical Range Finder>9000 USDThoughts?
>>4477236seems like a lot of money for an a7c
>>4477236No implicit photographic integrity, it will be a favorite of the usual cavefags who don't care about seeing the actual scene they're supposed to be capturing.
>>4477236>grip sold separately
>>4477238Reminder this schizo thinks AI is going to generate bigfoots massive penis directly into his rectum and fake the moon landing on uranus
>>4477240Ah yes, the ever-present implicit admission of bad ergonomic design.
>>4477244Shouldn't you be shitting up /tv/ with your garbage PGF threads, bigfootfag?
>>4477245>how am i supposed to one hand a 24-70 f1.8 and speedlite with this?Be a real photographer so you don’t need a bazooka lens and an on camera flash. >>4477248Meds schizo
>>4477249>I'm a real photographer because I shoot backs of strangers with the phone focal length!Sweetie, street isn't even photography.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExvNUZfsUh0This is for the rich boomers with old eyes.
>>4477252Helmut Newton, Ansel Adams, both used primes90% of adams’ work was with the typical 35/85 pair
>>4477252Lewis Baltz used a leica and a 50mm almost exclusively but all you care about are the nepojews who have moved on from living accomplishment free in the art world to living rent free in your head
why do we always get into these arguments when leica drops a new body as if they haven't been doing this for their entire history as a companyits just a camera for certain people who take pictures. it isn't the be all camera and they never said it was.just say either "its too expensive" or "it doesnt do what i need it to do" or both and move on.just sold my m11 but keeping my m10r and will be picking this up here shortly when available.
Next thing will be autofocusing M lenses.
>>4477238Excellent /p/ meme potential.
>>4477237Literally anything is better than an a7c
>>4477257>Lewis Baltz used a leicaOh it shows, one of the pioneers of taking pictures of walls. >>4477256None of those are 28mm and neither photographer is known for taking pics of strangers' backs, hobos and trash cans on the street. >>4477260Typical consoomer. Enjoy the lack of implicit photographic integrity I guess.
>>4477294>implicit photographic integritycANON's dick is still in your mouth. get it out, then think about what you just said.
>>4477236I think it's amazing and the first modern Leica to grab my attention. For all its criticisms, Leica still values portability and it reflects in their products. I can't think of a smaller, lighter camera that can put out SOOC quality like the M11.>>4477237You should post some comparison images between the a7c and the M11.
>>4477236Could've been cool but is it true the refresh rate is only 60fps? I don't see why I'd get this over an SL3 if I wanted Leica with EVFM10/M11 have had EVF attachments, that are arguably better since they can tilt too, but hardly anyone uses them, I sure don't use mine oftenAt the very least they could've stepped up their MF tech to meet what Nikon did years ago
>>4477336>I don't see why I'd get this over an SL3 if I wanted Leica with EVFThere is literally no point to this camera, you buy M-series because you wanna look through glass but have a mirrorless (so, digital rangefinders)
>>4477336>I don't see why I'd get this over an SL3 if I wanted Leica with EVFit's like half the weight
>>4477338>MUH GRAMS
>>4477325>You should post some comparison images between the a7c and the M11.And use this to make gearfags seethehttps://www.cobalt-image.com/product/leica-m-for-adobe-copy/?v=0b3b97fa6688
>>4477348The after they show gave her Sony tier illness
>>4477348>https://www.cobalt-image.com/product/leica-m-for-adobe-copy/?v=0b3b97fa6688>paying 50 squids for a piss filtershiggy diggy
The one good thing about m-mount with evf is that all those third parties where there are slight differences in flange distance like for instance the konica hexar lenses will now be perfectly usable.
It should have had L mount. >L mount: you can use M with adaptor>M mount: only usable with M One thing one can hope is that Leica making Q with L mount with IBIS.
>>4477435maybe they wanted m native system because it's a Leica m and they like to sell m lenses to the m person who had an L before
>>4477321how does this work when you edit your photo? does the photo editor add its own signature or does it add a second signature and preserve the first or what happens exactly
>>4477424They were already usable via live view or Leica's hot shoe EVFs
