poverty porn photographers destroyed in one scene
>>4478667damn, rekt by a Netflix bugman film from worst korea with a literal piss filter.
>>4478671
This is so retarded I'm not even going to bother to btfo it
>>4478667built for bwc(both of them)
>>4478667lol shes wrong though, she cant see the alley for what it is, an alley; has to give it some extra feelings/atributesalso why is everything so soft and bloomy, is that what people call kino nowadays?
>>4478667btfo lmaobut anyway why do koreans all have that same stupid haircut
>>4478756don't be lewd >>4478762it was kind of like a flashback so that's probably why the soft lighting >>4478769big coming from the broccoli hair people
>>4478667>b-but how would you feel if you had to->"I’ve always wanted to have an easier time getting away with rape and murder"Simple as that
>>4478667>>4478675>>4478738If I watch this show will it give me powers to have a cute korean girl following me around when I head to Seoul while doing street photography?
>>4478869I mean at least you'd have something to talk to her about, worth a shot.
>>4478667Is that what rich people look like in Korea, or can poor people not afford cameras?Is there like some jeet shitting behind a dumpster that isn't in the webm?
>>4478877takes place in 1996, the girl is poor the guy is from a wealthy family and is walking her home. lots of photography related plots starting in episode 2.
>>4478667Damn bitch beauty can happen everywhere so a man's gotta pin butterflies to the board. >>4478738Kek, how she bag'd that?
>>4479009she inherited it from her brother after he committed suicide
>>4479010oh...that's sad
>>4478667lol, is this whole thing basically him getting bullied?>>4478769most koreans don't. that's their equivalent of the soap opera lead special
>>4478738>>4478675is the movie just an advertisement for Leica?
>>4478667>3rd world problems I can't relate towhy should I care?
>>4478762OP is disingenuous, the scene actually keeps going and literally concludes on the reverse argument, with the kid seeing the beauty through the lens
>>4479516
>>4479518Jesus fuck this flick looks like it was college group assessment
>>4479519
>>4479470Most K dramas are
>>4479522they do love taking pictures
>>4479527
>>4479516How is that possible when using a rangefinder?
>>4479537Framing
>>4479518holy fuck bug people really have zero soul
what show / movie is this?
>>4479777You and Everything Else (2025)
>>4478667why not photo something pretty like a flower?alleyways are mostly dirty anyway
>>4479862Because you can’t get a handjob in a flower after your shoot.
>>4479907Yeah sure: Autism, being a dork, trying to be positive... Automatic faggotry.
>>4479862he was just walking her home
>>4480031Ah yes playing a dumb game. Cool. Yeah I do think this photography can be right in the right circumstances. Why the fuck call it porn though?
>>4480089Do you know how words work? They have this shit called a meaning, and then when you have a need for a place in a sentence to convey that meaning you use the word. Then as you find overlaps in meanings and words you can start to use them creatively for play and wit. Like children play and wit are key aspects of intellectual stimulation and growth. It’s an amazing innovation in thought and cognitive development that sadly seems to have left you behind.
>>4480111Sounds dumb.
>>4478756/thread
The alley looks ugly to the person who lives there because poor people have ugly minds.
>>4479537Rangefinders use lenses.
There is some truth to this. I live in a city which is a major tourist attraction. Japanese tourists come here and literally take photographs of the manhole covers.They take photographs of the side alleys full of shit and homeless people. The city is often called one of the most beautiful and historic in the world, but because I live here, to me its just home.I see all of the negative shit that they don't realise. I see the lack of progress. I see the lack of expansion or opportunity. I see the sad locals, putting on a fake smile for tourists just to make enough money to barely survive.I see it and I realise that part of the problem isnt the city. Its me. I see all of this sadness and I don't leave. I stay. And that is a failure on my behalf. The city isnt going to change. I need to find someone from another city. Who feels the same. And leave with them.
>>4480383Abdul you are 100% right Paris could still be beautiful if you just left and took all your ilk with you.
>>4480383>>4480415Interesting, Paris. I didn't think of that place.>And leave...Ok. So we know OP is brown. But what country is it from?>Japanese tourists...I was thinking somewhere in Asia since most JP tend to travel in Asian countries due to familiarity.>alleys full of shit...India?>homeless people...South Korea maybe. And Japanese like to visit that dreary country to see how far from grace their old colony has fallen.>most beautiful and historic in the world...Ok. So India is out. Maybe Singapore?
>>4478667poverty porn is jewish at best and retarded at worst. also it's boring. I've never even exposed my camera's sensor to browns.
>>4480491>historic and beautiful>Singaporenigga lmao what, Singapore is a tech dystopia, nothing historic and beautiful over there.Hell, even Guangzhou is less depressing.
>>4480383>shit in the streets>homelessstop doxxing yourself, paris anon
is this really how you develop photos?
>>4478671>Anon is too young to have known sodium-vapor lampMy condolences.
>>4481382Err. Depends. If that's supposed to be a print she has then yes. That would be an enlarged exposure which as long as it's already fixed is accurate BUT we don't see anything other than a piece of whatever. It could also be a piece of sheet film that's been fixed and she's inspecting, but if the movie is about a leica that's shooting 35mm then it's definitely a print.Now the fucky thing is, I've seen plenty of media portray film dev in a darkroom and they fuck it up by leaving that red light on OR not using a changing bag; unfixed film is FUCKED even when exposed to that red light (and any light). If for instance the clip here is supposed to be the "development" step of dev then it's inaccurate because the film would be cooked.Developing 35mm film takes about 30m-1h of active involvement (spooling, dev, stop bath, fixing, drying, hanging) and then about 24h until it's ready and dry to be either enlarged or digitized. I'm actually not sure if sheet film takes longer.tl;dr: unsure, need to see longer scene. Probably accurate if showing the end result of an enlarged print.[spoiler][/spoiler]
>>4479761That fucking bitch ass don't even try to level the camera
>>4481382Fairly accurate depiction of printing. She'd have to look a bit closer to get it in focus, and probably use a focusing aid. And typically you'd do a test strip to get the exposure right, but they could've edited that out.>>4481404It's surely printing, you don't use an enlarger for film development.For older period pieces having the safelight on for film developing could be accurate, ortho film used to be common which is not affected by red light. Anything recent you are right you need absolute darkness.
>>4481426this part of the show takes place around 2003 in korea, the film is supposed to be kodak Tri-X I think.
>>4481427Tri-x is panchromatic and would need to be developed in total darkness.But that clip doesn't show developing the film, that would have all been done beforehand. It starts with her loading the developed, cut and dried film into the enlarger.
>>4481426>It's surely printing, you don't use an enlarger for film development.Yeah nah I brain farted and didn't word that well or think it through. Watching it again, it's also it's super obvious it's a print.
part 1
part 2
>>4478756This.Asian "men" and women are meant to be sexually dominated by vastly superior white males.
>>4478756underrated post
>>4479498it's called seeing things from someone else's perspectivemaybe you'd understand if you weren't a military-grade autist
>>4481560>the fixer has acid in it, if it gets on your skin it'll burn right through>proceeds to stick his hands right in itlmaoI never heard of burns from fixer, stop is the acidic one but it's just vinegar.That's an interesting film tank/loader. I've never seen one like that but it's probably legit. Not sure why they're doing it all under safelight while it's in the tank.
>>4481618>stop is the acidic one but it's just vinegar.Interesting. If I normally just use water for a stop bath would adding vinegar to make a solution be better than straight tap water?
>>4481623One or two % of acetic acid is enough if you do not reuse stop. So 2 parts of 5-10% white vinegar and 8 parts of water. Less water if you save the stop for next time. Few % citric acid also works, and does not stink like vinegar. About 30g / liter or oz per quart or whatever. Molds can grow in dilute citric acid so better not store it...
>>4481645The vinegar stink is what etched the darkroom into my memory from high school, highly recommended
>>4481623Advantage of acidic stop is it stops developing immediately (which matters if using fact acting develoer) and it keeps fixer PH down if you reuse it.
>>4480501based
