why do you guys all not like ken rockwell?he seems cool and his photos are prettyi dont get itplus he has good advice on his web-sitemaybe we can appreciate him in this thread?that would be nicei will post my favourite ken rockwell photographs
i like this photo because fall is my favourite season and trees become pretty
trees are the reason this photo is great
i respects ken's creativity and ability to try new things in this photo
the colours here make me feel happy
this one is so sharp!
Quick, everyone kenfry your images.
>>4479867On Ken Rockwell's desktop, the Trash Icon is really a link to National Geographic Magazine
Best version of Zach in the world. XD HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>4479867Here is a photo KR thought would be a good example of a high quality image a given camera takes.Gee thanks Ken.
>>4480303Putting a camera in kens hands gimps it hard. According to ken rockwell the nikon z8 isnt good enough for him and the canon r5 has the same IQ as an iphone. remember to set sharpening and saturation to max, shoot jpeg because raw is a time wasting scam, and stop all the way down because diffraction is a pixel peeper lie! gee why does it look like a phone photowheres mah cloud detect autofocus reehe makes the /p/-specific two man sony hate brigade look skilled, knowledgeable, and grounded in reality>>4479987the trash icon is just a link to his portfolio, which he likes to think is national geographic, with as much truth to it as his status as a professional with clients and awardsrunning a joke lie for 20 years just makes you a liar
>>4480307You just sound angry and jealous about ken's success and growing family.
>>4479867most of the people on this board are liberal arts majors who try way to hard to make their photo look good only to circle back and make their photos look like shit.Are there """rules""" for photography? yeah shit like rule of thirds, but like music theory those are more like guidelines to help you take a good photograph. People on here take good photographs but some of them try so hard it circles back to being shit
>>4480361Yeah we all know the “best” artists never go to no stinkin art school, they go to engineering school & fail at becoming engineers too.
>>4480335>successHis wife’s realestate profits>growing familyChildhood obesityThe man is fucked, honestly. I feel bad for his kids. >no time to eat healthy kids the z8 isnt good enough for daddy so he has to go try out the a1 and r5 and take the same six photos as the last 100 times. have a pizza instead.
>>4479867I'm fine with Rockwell, I like his equipment reviews.
>>4480439Go be retarded somewhere else kid.
He's a good photographer, I know /p/ gives him shit for pumping up saturation levels and only shooting on jpeg but he has his own style, people will know a ken rockwell photo when they see it.
>>4479867He likes cameras, and likes a certain look no matter what others say./p/ hates cameras, and follows whatever is trending.
>>4480829>people will know a ken rockwell photo when they see it.boomers all take the same kind of fucked up saturation photos because their eyes are falling
>>4480881No, it's because he came crom film.During the film age, the boomers all had gearfag wars over which film stocks had the vest colors. At the time, this mean which film stock had the MOST colors, because a problem with film is that some color ranges are less saturated.So when they shelled out their kidneys for the new digital cameras and found out you could blast colors to nuclear waste, they mistakenly thought they had "won" the gearfag autism bowl.Ken just never escaped this mindset.
>>4480890*from*bestSometimes I wish my phone had blobmera controls
