Should i get a Sony zv-e 10 II new or a Lumix S II.My goal is 4k 30fps with the highest dynamic range possible, 10bit log and fast sensor readout speed (low jellow)
but a nikon zr.
>>4481443not in the same price range
>>4481441whatever marketed with global shuttermaybe second hand ccd coolpix
>>4481441I like her two 1.2f's
>>4481441Her stuff was pretty underwhelming once you get past blasting a load to the fat tits. Pretty vanilla uncharismatic frdige bod masturbation is the craziest she’ll do type stuff. Crazy people out there pay for it.
>>4481441
>>4481494https://www.google.com/search?q=nikon+green+tint
>>4481523Trotti troll sisters, not like this!
Who is she?
>>4481441can someone with grok imagine credits left today get her clothes to fall off with a micro bikini under it? asking for my friend (me)
>>4481441I'm not staring at them, they're staring at me.
>>4481494ghoulishglad I decided against Sony
>>4481545search Bunkr dot io for "littlerobin"
>>4481556
>>4481441you can do that with a lumix s5. better images, before the faggots ruined the sensor with phase AF
>>4481589chat is this real?
>>4481441name?
>>4481494>only ever one example posted and it was by a known idiotLol, every time.
>>4481494>the image that destroyed /p/
>>4485905ehhh... sure why not.I like the little goblin that crawled out her butt to help pull her clothes off. I'm so glad we're all going to gamble our entire economy and energy industry so Ai can replace everything and everyone as quickly as possible. Finally we can all sit in our little cardboard boxes looking at 6.5-fingered cartoon boobgirls.
SII in general is gorillion times better choice especially if you can pair it with an anamorphic lens. As to DR I've heard stories that older S1 has a bit better dynamic range than SII. Not sure if true.Also I assume you meant ZV-E1 as in the full frame version. ZV-E10 is APS-C. (Both are shite - get an FX30 or used FX3)>>4481494Doesn't really matter for video - as soon as this thing hits Resolve it gets hit with a rec. 709 conversion and (if needed) colorized from there. Generally in video Sony skin colors are usually overly red - not green.
>go to youtube>check for muh cinematic gear advice>influencer tells me to buy fast 1.4 lens for muh bokeh>need expensive ND filter to shoot at fast apertures>also to make it really movie like, need black mist filterWhen in reality all iconic movies barely use any sort of background blur because it would kill immersion when all you see is just the actors. Black mist was popular in 90s soap operas and that's it. No real film maker would use smear on his 20k$ lens. All you need as a non pro consumer is a small compact prime and shoot at f8+. No need of an ND filter then in most situations. Can even shoot fully manual because at those apertures it's easier than auto. I bet with an 99$ 7artisan at those settings you get more cinematic than with any Sony 50mm 1.2 GM lens.
>>4488812have fun shooting at f22 all summer because lol no ndnow you realize why vidiots think they need 4k60 and 4k120 without a crop yes? its not just to smooth out their bad technique
>>4488812Nothing is cinematic about chinkshit lenses ass color rendition and fugly flare. At least buy a vintage nikon/canon prime ffs (cinematographers actually use those)Also that way you’re not giving money directly to chinks
>>44888127artisan is a goated cine lens (both photo and video versions as I'm pretty sure they're the same lens)Get a bog standard 24-70 and a cine prime and you'll be set for life.
>>4488878Are these actually able to cover full frame? Because most cine lenses I see on alichingchong only cover a crop sensor.That 35mm looks genuinely deadly.
You might want to crop just a tadhttps://youtu.be/T-zs6qbOW6IDude here cropped to x1.1 and it's perfectly finehttps://youtu.be/9Z0vKKT-6k8
>>4481441>highest dynamic range possiblealexa 35 brobut seriously, learn how to light the scene, and any camera will do just fine
>>4488927Wow it even has an emergency butt plug
>>4488812You're right about the apertures and f1.4 being a meme for it, but you do need an ND filter, that's the one piece of gear that is unquestionably needed unless you only film indoors.
>>4481494>posted it again award
>>4488812You need an ND filter if you shoot any kind of log during daylight, even stopped down
>>4488812>No need of an ND filterIf you shoot "cienema" you are gonna be shooting with a 180degree shutter. With a base iso of most cameras at 800, 1/48s outside is going to be fucking impossible. Even 100iso will be a stop over at f16.
>>4481589>unzips dickAI porn is so good its unreal. dont even need OF anymore
