Should wild subjects have privacy?
Should you take a good photo for once?
>>4481666>oncehopefully
>>4481665Does it harm the animal in any way? There are human harms to some breaches of privacy, but does the same hold true for an animal?If it doesn't harm the animal, then should be fair game. No?
>>4481670So i can watch them have sex?
>>4481681Depends on why you're doing it.>watching them because its nature and you're a nature photographer>you believe that your photo will improve things in some waythis is okay>you get a sick joy from watching animals bump ugliesthis is bad. You are doing a harm to yourself by indulging in this joy.
>>4481665not in public spacebut better make them sign a release just in case
>>4481665Do they want it?(uploading files in incognito mode is not allowed.jpg)
>>4481735
>>4481735>(uploading files in incognito mode is not allowed.jpg)Works on my machine.
>>4481665Best thread on /p/ right now Greatest question of the century in photography.
This is one of the reasons why I appreciate photographing insects. People care a lot less. There's like a million of them.When we have like 4 owls in that one patch of woods and there's 50 photographers going after it (exaggeration) I can see where the issues start. So much attention will disrupt their lifecycle. And when there's so few individuals...
