What's your favorite Ken Rockwell photo?
>>4484775That one's pretty good.
>>448514710/10 in my books.
>>4484775
That oversaturated photo, you know which one.
>>4485302
>>4484775>>4485301>>4485304>>4485304you guys act like he doesn't have a growing family.
all of them
>>4485304Based Ken. He is the perfect example of everything a photographer shouldn't do, but he also doesn't have the massive ego, so he is in perfect balance. Love this guy.
Any photo of his Excellency's that luminar neo has made to "explode".
>>4485301wtf Ken started the watchposting meme?
>>4484775>>4485301>>4485558Sorry I'm new to photography and this board. Is this a joke? These don't look that good. Thanks in advance.
>>4486058No. Ken rockwell is a god tier photographer. You should do your best to produce photos just like his. Everyone will be proud of you. Only children and gearfags dislike his great works.
>>4486058Ken is based because he just does what he wants and doesn't give a fuck.
>>4486058Ken's an icon in the hobby, one of the internet OG's for photography. His website is still great as a technical resource, but he's always been shit on for his editing style, and growing family. Mythic meme tier now, like Bob Ross, or fit's Scooby.Here's some of his last few years of stuff. His modern stuff is still quite saturated, but I feel like really suffers from over sharpening. He also makes use of perspective correction / keystone adjustments very often.
The king of smartphone photography.OversharpeningOversaturationHighlight slider to -100Shadow slider to +100The ultimate Ken preset
I dont even think he's that bad. His photos are over saturated sure but thats just his thing
I hate his style but it's definitely his own. Lmao this thread.
>>4486395The Roy's sign photo is unironically really good. His oversaturation style can work, but the issue is that he just uses it for literally everything.
