[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: PGX90321.jpg (1.3 MB, 2592x1944)
1.3 MB
1.3 MB JPG
Welcome to /m43/general!

m43 sisters, we are known to be adventurers at heart. While Wormfags and Snoybois debate mtf charts and x-trans rights, we go out and explore the world around us. Capturing its beauty within m43's infinite depth of field.

In this edition: I am back to m43. I've sold my huge bulky Nikon Zf after realizing that I'm way too feminine to lug around such a huge piece of Japanese technology and I got meself a brand new OM5 Mk. II.

I also got a GX9 to live out my closeted homesexual street photography urges. Picrelated is my sane financial choices in one picture. Enjoy!

A list of m43 youtubers you should totally watch if you hate yourself:

Landscape (leaves and rocks):
Guido v. (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@GuidoVanDeWater
Henry Turner (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@HenryTurnerphoto
Waterfall Joe (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@WaterfallJoe/videos
Ian Worth (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@ian_worth/videos

Nature/Wildlife (bird buttholes):
Lee Hoy (OM1.2) - https://www.youtube.com/@leehoyphotography
Espen Helland (OM5, OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@EspenHelland
Emilie Talpin (OM1.2) - https://www.youtube.com/@EmilieT

Street (just buttholes):
Jimmi West (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@jimmywestphoto

Gearfags/AIDS (insufferable assholes):
M43 Guy - https://www.youtube.com/@ThatMicro43Guy
Micro Four Nerds - https://www.youtube.com/@MicroFourNerds
RED35 - https://www.youtube.com/@Red35Photography
Robin Wong - https://www.youtube.com/@robinwong
Thomas Eisl - https://www.youtube.com/@ThomasEisl.Photography
Chris Baitson - https://www.youtube.com/@ChrisBaitson (ultra fag)
>>
>>4485342
Kill yourself
>>
File: OM520032.jpg (1.34 MB, 2592x1944)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB JPG
>>4485343
no, u
>>
>my mount system is so special it needs its own thread durr
At least it's easy to filter I guess
>>
File: OB220472.jpg (1.37 MB, 2592x1944)
1.37 MB
1.37 MB JPG
>>4485345
nophotos need to shut up and go back to their fool frame threads
>>
>>4485348
This is worse than no photo, now kill yourself.
>>
>>4485348
Nah he’s right kill yourself
>>
File: 1763907671564768.jpg (8 KB, 198x255)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>4485348
This looks like a phone pic.
>>
File: OB220358.jpg (641 KB, 1944x2592)
641 KB
641 KB JPG
>>4485352
tell me which phone offers this superb quality and haptic enjoyment of a proper camera
>>
>>4485342
>m43 sisters, we are known to be adventurers at heart. While Wormfags and Snoybois debate mtf charts and x-trans rights, we go out and explore the world around us. Capturing its beauty within m43's infinite depth of field.
omg this is so me i'm literally just about to go out on a hike/snowshoe with my m43 gear. the light looks like it'll suck though, c'est la vie
>In this edition: I am back to m43. I've sold my huge bulky Nikon Zf after realizing that I'm way too feminine to lug around such a huge piece of Japanese technology and I got meself a brand new OM5 Mk. II.
this is also me (but i only got the om-5 mk i). idgaf about youtubers though
>>
>>4485354
>>this superb quality
>Anon tries to justify his buyer's remorse with a three-stop underexposed phone snapshit.
Yeahh.... buddy... no.
>>
File: OB220527.jpg (1.7 MB, 1944x2592)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB JPG
>>4485362
>nophoto opinion
into /dev/null it goes
>>
File: Clouds3.jpg (1.72 MB, 3000x3846)
1.72 MB
1.72 MB JPG
>>4485363
That's obviously a phone pic. You aren't fooling anyone.
>>
Micro four thirds always looks so shit. Why do people shill it? Fuji xt5 and canon r7 fully outdated it. It has no reason to exist except for some faggots that cant handle 1lb.

And the im better than you attitude… bitch your camera is DEFINED by not being able to afford a better one. It is objectively bad. Know your place.

>>4485360
Wow nice google pixel
>>
>>4485363
This was obviously shot on an android phone
>>
File: 1762272778034017.gif (544 KB, 498x200)
544 KB
544 KB GIF
>itt we see anon try and defend his poor life choices and fail against the might of the collective's common sense
>>
>>4485342
Just be normal and use a d750 and 50mm f1.8
>>
File: Hawk5.jpg (1.73 MB, 3000x3136)
1.73 MB
1.73 MB JPG
>>4485380
>>4485375
>>4485368
>>4485367
NOPHOTO FAGGOTS! REEEEEEEEE
>>
File: OB281375.jpg (754 KB, 2592x1944)
754 KB
754 KB JPG
>>4485367
you sound mad. typical wormji seethe :)
>>
File: OB220449.jpg (2.26 MB, 2592x1944)
2.26 MB
2.26 MB JPG
>>4485380
been there, done that. dslrs are dead - and for good reason
>>
>>4485384
??

Sensor from d750 is the same as the sensor in z6 line?

Sensor from d850 is still top rated sensor ever made, and even z7 and z8 are considered to be inferior?

Seems that you are just retarded
>>
File: OB281381.jpg (729 KB, 2592x1944)
729 KB
729 KB JPG
>>4485385
>muh sensor
this ain't a gearfag thread
>>
>>4485382
>>4485383
>>4485384
>>4485386
What the actual fuck are you doing? Is this a phone camera? Are you cropping and rotating out half the resolution? Are you using AI?

Huskyfag hated m43 so much he took the time to prove equivalent settings were a half stop darker on the m43 and his em5 shots still looked as good as APS-C when not testing equivalency and just giving it the extra half stop of light. How the fuck can you be worse at this than huskyfag? Literally ken rockwell’s dogsitting side gig?
>>
File: Reach2.jpg (1.63 MB, 2488x3000)
1.63 MB
1.63 MB JPG
>>4485387
Lets see your great works, nophoto. I doubt you have the reach and capabilities for images like this.
>>
File: 1756030064580788.jpg (101 KB, 500x675)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>this aint a gearfag thread btw i constantly buy cameras because i want to impress my 4chan friends but i also hate photography and hate carrying a camera so i am never happy with anything and I only put the bare minimum effort into taking photos so every camera sucks after i buy it
Earth to OP:
Grow the fuck up
GROW THE FUCK UP

Your idiotic consumerist behavior is inexcusable
These blurry, phone tier snapshits are inexcusable

Fucking dpreview mooks shoot better shit. Jesus fucking christ.

Grow the fuck up. This is either the hobby for you or it isn't and between your gear pile and these godawful "photos" it clearly isn't.

Move on. Go get (you)s on /mu/ by buying boutique pedals or something.
>>
File: IMG_8999s.jpg (2.77 MB, 5616x3744)
2.77 MB
2.77 MB JPG
>>4485354
This has more detail and was taken with a phone (xiaomi 16 pro max)
>>
File: OB281369.jpg (746 KB, 2592x1944)
746 KB
746 KB JPG
>>4485387
>a bloo bloo bloo
who's gonna read all that shit? not me. get lost nophoto fool framer
>>
>>4485396
>>4485402
Phone wins easily between these
>>
>>4485402
>be gearfag
>take literal phone quality photos of gear
Yeah sell that shit
>>
Everyone is switching to M43. Why aren't you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPxMbMuy-zo
>>
File: 16180379076750.png (277 KB, 398x376)
277 KB
277 KB PNG
>>4485403
holy detail mogged
how will m43 ever come back from this ahahahaha
>>
>>4485418
phones have tons of ai upscaling now, mine only does it for close objects, not sure if it does ai trickery for moon and stars/milky way, but for sure a lot of phones do now
>>
>>4485418
Phone close focus shooting is actually decent because doing near-macro with an UWA is basically cheating and getting closer lessens the visibility of detail smearing. Better results are to be had with superior sensors but it takes more effort.
>>
>>4485410
>nobody youtubers are giving up on good cameras because people dont look at their photos for longer than 1s or larger than 720p - if they even do if it’s not a pixel peeping segment (youtube shows most viewers skip to those)
Lol even doghair has a realer audience than a youtuber
Imagine being a youtube photographer (gear reviewer)
>>
>>4485431
>nobody youtubers
yeah, Ian Worth switched recently, too
so that's hardly "nobody"
m43 is having a great revival - only /p/incels get left behind masturbating to their wormjis and snoys
>>
I just switched to M43 over from Full Frame myself. Behold!
>>
File: 5DS_8099.jpg (1.57 MB, 2048x1536)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB JPG
>>4485470
And with a photo, too!
>>
>>4485471
oversharpened
toxoplasmosis
face not in focus
its a canon so it looks like m43 anyways
2/10 would not print
>>
>>4485456
>The wristlet youtoobr swaped to the lighter kit because it's obviously better and no it's not because he just doesn't want to carry actual gear around
Smaller kits are fine but don't delude yourself.
You could just use your phone but MFThirdies can't larp or pretend they're god's gift to photos unless they have camera ergos to show off.
Show me one photo that doesn't look like a phone pic.
>>
>>4485472
If it helps at all, it's not the face you're supposed to focus on, it's the eyes. You'd only have the face in focus if the subject's head was angled down or you were stopped down enough to cover both. Have you started recently?
>>
>>4485475
>if it helps me justify a bad photo, having essential features out of focus is correct and looks great according to me
>>
>>4485477
I don't remember saying it was a good photo, but the focus was definitely proper. You focus on the eyes every time - this is a pretty basic thing, bad photos or otherwise.
>>
>>4485471
lol how much AI trickery went into fixing the fucked up focus?
>>
>>4485475
>Have you started recently?

>eyes in focus
>nose not in focus
>ears? what ears - I just see blur
>muh bokeh
>muh open aperture
more like you started recently lol
>>
>>4485474
unironically I would use phone if it had dials and physical shutter buttan
and if you could turn off the AI rape
>>
>>4485495
Well, it's not like this particular thread (or RPT) deserves better than a 5 year old snapshit anyway. Maybe I should quit digging through my archives.

Besides, my trolling got responses like I wanted. Thank you.
>>
>>4485504
you sad sad little man with toxoplasmosis making you retarded
>>
>>4485515
Is English not your first language?
>>
>>4485517
are you a sad little man? with toxoplasmosis making him retarded? typical m43 thread
>>
>>4485518
>typical m43 thread
This. I wish M43 users weren't so stupid that they thought you had to have the whole face in focus (and with implications that it takes priority over the eyes!). I guess that's what happens when you're used to everything being "in focus" and not used to having to be careful with the focal plane of a real lens (and don't even get me started on field curvature - be happy that your baby lenses can't have this issue).
>>
>>4485523
You do have to have the whole face in focus. Most medium format aka real photography shots are at f11-f16.
>>
>>4485524
Your bait needs work.
>>
>>4485504
>i'm just playing retarded - the post
yes, of course it's just a 5yo snapshot. of course it's just bait to get replies. sure anon.
>>
>>4485523
why have anything in focus? why not have just bokeh? I mean that's what you paid for with that ass gape open f1.2 lens
>>
>>4485534
It's okay to fall for it once in a while, there's no need to project your own cope.
>>4485535
f1.4 stopped down to f2.
>>
File: 6D2_2149.jpg (1.33 MB, 1080x1620)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB JPG
Okay, here's an actual M43 shot.
>>
>>4485555
Why is the tonality so bad and where is all the microdetail?
>>
>>4485556
becuase it's shot with a snoy
>>
>>4485556
Because I shot it wide open and underexposed on a 6D2 (which has shit for dynamic range even compared to other Canons), then my own amateurish edits crunched what little was left, and that'll kill detail quickly no matter what format you're using. More importantly, the lighting already sucked.

Yet, it still felt like a breath of fresh air after my GH5.
>>
Break time at work, where'd everyone go? I guess it's nighttime across the ocean.
>>
>>4485588
if you had a full frame camera you’d have real friends fyi
>>
>>4485603
TRUKE
>>
File: m8.png (113 KB, 285x219)
113 KB
113 KB PNG
>>4485603
Australians' don't have friends, we have M8s.
>>
File: authentic_m43.jpg (4.58 MB, 2600x3465)
4.58 MB
4.58 MB JPG
>>4485555
>>4485560
Alright alright here's a purebred 43 shot that Ansel himself would be proud of.
>>
File: PGX90675.jpg (898 KB, 1944x2592)
898 KB
898 KB JPG
>>4485342
what a wonderful morning. 2 degrees C, sunshine, driving my convertible
how can foolfags even compete?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.