What is the future of photography /pIf you were starting today what would you buy?Will stand alone cameras start needing more technological integrated features?Will cameras push harder for realism and imbedded certificates to show its a real photo or will cameras start integrating inbuilt editing features to add in skies on blown photos etc? Will standalone cameras start adding features to make short form video?I’m just worried buying today the world of photography is about to go through its most drastic change in its entire existence and this will occur over the next 10 yearsThoughts?
>>4487189Mirrorless cameras will be dead in 10 years. Only phone cameras will exist as AI will solve all of their current shortcomings.
>>4487191So I should just buy the best phone camera possible? I’m thinking I might delay purchase and wait one more year and see what happens in the market?
>>4487189Anything not shot on film becomes worthlessShow negs enters the common lexiconSam Altman calls people like >>4487191 "stupid fucking cattle, our most useless golems" in a leaked zoom chat Phone cameras roll out an OTA update, even if turned off, that allows AI to censor police, ICE, and mil/ng activity and flag people who attempt to record it.
>>4487194Hmm thats a worry, it’s opening a whole new can of worms, should the camera automatically edit anything out of your photo it considers offensive? That is an aspect I hadn’t considered. I just want to take photos not get spied on and have my photos changed.
>>4487194>>4487197>cANON's new schtick is to sockpuppet and pretend he has suddenly "realized" the bullshit points he's been spewing for years now>can't avoid falling to cANONisms like muh worms anywaysI'll save you some time and say the next step in your logic is that without an OVF you can't trust whatever comes out of the camera like you've been shilling for years
>>4487229Meds. Now.
>>4487230I'm not the one saying AI censorship on the fly and faked photos of the Apollo sites are coming
>>4487229Bro you got canonworms in your brain.
>>4487229cANON is not that smart...
>>4487191Unless camera sensors make extreme strides in quality (and I mean EXTREME), that isn't going t happen. Using AI generated shit for commercial work like real estate or product photos is not allowed due to false advertising, no way real estate companies or major companies are going to get tied up in that shit constantly.
>>4487234Actually he is smarter, maybe he's playing dumb here or it's not him. He's said before that not even film can be trusted if you aren't the photographer. The questionable part is him claiming mirrorless is always untrustworthy because of AI when everyone knows chatGPT wasn't even around when some of the older models Like the A73 came out.
>/p/: le heckin AI bad I am a real artist!
Id buy a used Sony A7 or Nikon Z5/6 and go from there.
>>4487263>All I know about photography is the snapshit.
>>4487189photos that aren't perfect will become more normal. I don't mean like composition and colors, but that things that are normally removed from photos like power lines and stuff will be left in.Cameras will probably stop letting you replace the battery or fit an SD card, but cameras themselves will still exist. There will probably be consumer cameras with a lot more ai features to make up for shitty sensors.
>>4487232Implying believing in the moon landing makes you the rational one.
