New color film!!!lucky 200 has finally dropped.Anybody shot it yet? waiting for my order to arrive.
>>4488583I've shot two rolls but haven't developed it yet. I doubt it's going to be anywhere near as good as a cheap Vision3 repack which is the same price.
>>4488584Yeah from what I can tell their B&W Lucky 400 is worse than Kentmere 400 or 100 and it's more expensive than either.Maybe if this stuff was like $8 a roll then sure, but I dont see the point.
>>4488583yeah its alright, shot a roll so far
to think lomography sold literal garbage rolls (some even marked with letters and codes on top of the image) for $20, and still do
Damn I expected chinaslop to cost less than Kodak Gold
>>4488601>>4488638>>4488641its cheaper if you are from a third hole shithole, a roll of Gold cost 15 usd for me. And Lucky its just 9 USD so yeah.
>>4488583I've shot with the BW 400. I just finished my roll of Lucky 200, but I haven't developed it yet.
>>4488583how long does Reflx Lab take to ship to the US?
I'm shooting with them, for the first time both with a 35mm camera and with my first roll of film... from what I've seen online, it doesn't seem bad... I bought about 10 rolls of film, all different from each other. I'll test them all and post here when they're developed.
>>4488641tarrifs?>>4488638it's a lomo thing bro you just wouldn't get it, true lomocels love fucked up shit that doesn't work how it's meant to
>>4488583Kinda want to try Shanghai 100s but its so expensive to import here unless I buy it in bulk. I imagine Lucky 200 will be just as gay to get.
