[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3843.jpg (1.36 MB, 4032x3024)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB JPG
So I see some absolutely beautiful sunrises at work this time of year. Realistically what kind of gear would I be looking at to get better than my phone camera (iPhone 14). Not sure on what I’m looking for, but I would also like it to be capable of low light exposure/ night time for aurora. Literally have no idea on what I need and the options available out there are worst than trying to figure out what caliber you need for accuracy out at 300 vs 1,500 yards. Is the iPhone just good enough for my amateur needs?
>>
File: IMG_3896.jpg (1.57 MB, 4032x3024)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB JPG
>>4489472
Also what kind of lens should I be looking at for winter usage, it’s currently 0F with a high of 16F so it’s gotta be kind of rugged to survive up here. I know the phone zoom loses detail and I’m not opposed to spending money on a silly hobby.
This pic no phone zoom
>>
File: IMG_3897.jpg (1.89 MB, 4032x3024)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB JPG
>>4489473
Vs phone zoom
>>
Duluth?
Most digital cameras are fine with the cold, it's water and dust that are the problems. When you bring it inside it's best to put it in a plastic bag, because as it warms up you can get condensation inside if there is too much airflow. Weather sealed cameras will do better because there is less airflow (as long as you keep the lens on). Batteries go dead quicker when they're cold so you get a few and keep them warm in your pocket.
>>4489474
Phones don't zoom they just crop and upsample. Anything with actual zoom will be better. Get a d7100 and some basic kit lens (18-105?). And a tripod if you want to take pictures of auroras.
>>
People here will claim otherwise but phone photos look fucking awful to me. Maybe they're better from a strict resolution and sharpness perspective but I prefer how my old as shit, entry level Nikon D40 looks with a half decent lens to any iphone photo I've seen.
>>
>>4489472
fuck you and die
>>
>>4489505
>Most digital cameras are fine with the cold,
Retarded cunt. Under 20f the LCD screens start to freeze after 5 minutes. You are a MORON
>>
>>4489550
bit much imo
>>
>>4489553
>live in Canada
>cameras see 0F for hours on end for years
>no problems
???
>>
>>4489553
You don't need the LCD to take pictures, and what kind of dogshit camera do you have that freezes up under 20 degrees? The screen gets laggy on my z6 below single digits but it's still perfectly usable and the EVF has no issues at all.
>>4489541
They look awful because even the "good" phone cameras have shit sensors and can only produce anything decent with a ton of automatic processing that makes them look like aislop.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.