[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766980836004189.jpg (2.04 MB, 4500x3132)
2.04 MB
2.04 MB JPG
I will post some more examples.
>>
File: 1745818142769074.jpg (1.32 MB, 2657x2022)
1.32 MB
1.32 MB JPG
>>
>>4490978
Still life, product photography, stock images
>>
File: Runny_hunny.jpg (249 KB, 800x1213)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>
File: FoodMeat.jpg (253 KB, 1280x849)
253 KB
253 KB JPG
>>4490980
thank you
>>
File: k7249-7.jpg (217 KB, 640x906)
217 KB
217 KB JPG
>>4490982
What is it about this image (the meat) that gives it a very recognizable late 80's early 90's feel ?
>>
File: USDA_wheat.jpg (337 KB, 800x1172)
337 KB
337 KB JPG
>>
File: Patates2.jpg (110 KB, 429x648)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
>>
>>4490984
Maybe the more natural looking warm soft light without the lifted shadows common in modern product photography.
>>
>>
File: Desserts.jpg (297 KB, 800x1215)
297 KB
297 KB JPG
>>
I'm thinking film, medium format and incandescent light
>>
>>4490978
A studio product photo.
The result of much planning and position, a lot of very good lighting equipment placed intentionally and probably done by someone experienced, and what is likely a full frame digital camera using a short-telephoto prime lens with a moderately wide aperture in-use.
Emphasis on the lighting. If this was lit half-assedly or was just a photo using direct-flash or natural lighting it would look far, far worse than it does.
I don't see anything that gives it away as film.
It's also probably photoshopped a fair bit, as it is a product shot.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.