>Color Science editionPreviously: >>4495130
>>4497651What do you gentlemen think about the Sony A7R V?
got donatedFTb + AE1-Program w/ winderFD SC set of 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 135/3.5neat
>I buy $4000 of gear to shoot JPG
>>4497651why are they so terribly underexposedgearfags suck so hard at photographylike just use the auto mode at this point
>>4497659Dynamic range? Not for me.
>>4497658>I buy $4000 of gear but then have to buy an additional lightroom subscription and boomer desktop PC just to end up making JPGs anyway that dont look like shit
>>4497171>Are there any types of (cheap/Shitty) lens that have a lot of chromatic abberation? If its a different mounting system, does the fact that you are using a lens adaptor help in getting that effect?>Any tips in achieving this?>Pic related is from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chromatic_aberration_(comparison).jpg>>4497261I've got 58 thread on what I use, so that might work. hmmm.I actually thought you were talking about those teleconverters that go in between the lens and the camera.>>4497280>I bet really old brass lenses with simple designs you could adapt would have significant CA. There are small ones with shorter focal lengths that are not very expensive you could get. They should work fine projection-wise on FF or smaller.Any specific model names that come to mind?
