How do you change your camera settings when you want to photograph a black person?
>>4502170But to answer your question, full auto
I don’t take picture of black “people”
>>4502169Try exposing to the right
Bump up the shadows in post. Tone adjustment in the curve profile works wonders too.You guys aren't being racist on 4chan are you? We don't tolerate racism here.
>>4502185Settle down Buttigieg
>>4502169>when you want to photograph a black personwhen what? lmao
>>4502175>>4502195limp-dick motherfuckers trying to be edgy
>>4502185>Bump up the shadows in post. Tone adjustment in the curve profileThat's the same thing, senpai
>>4502283>>4502185isn't that whitewashing though? how do I photograph them without erasing their culture?
>>4502169You don't. There's no camera in this world that's designed and made for them by any techno congrlomerate because there's no black worth taking photos of
>>4502277Maybe I'm too contrarian but it's not even edgy anymore. All these Johnny-come-latelys weren't racist 10 years ago when it was actually subversive and are riding on the coattails of better men.
>>4502307Kodak Ektar says hiRemember kids film is better and:Photos of white people? = PortraPhotos of mexicans? = Kodak GoldPhotos of blacks? = EktarPhotos of chinks? = Tmax
>>4502169stop trying to steal their souls.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eBaPJ9houyc
>>4502277Go cry about it on Reddit lmao
>>4502169I usually meter off the lightest skinned subject in the frame. I don't concern myself when black people look black. I shoot for fidelity. If I want to lie to the world I'll make her look more human in post.
>>4502169set mode dial to Nbe mindful of face shine when you expose for skin tones
ok, I tried. How well did I do?
attempt 2
attempt 3
>>4502169Use the same settings as your scene, same reason why an incident meter doesn't care what shade an object is
>>4502169I handcuff the camera to my wrist
>>4502169Ai? Or got a name or more pics? I m really curious if she really has blue eyes or her black is that black Looks like a white woman with black skin.O know some blacks from east africa have white features, no big lips noses or look like monkeys but this one is too extremeReverse image search brings nothing
>>4503823>white featuresLooks like AI but white women don't have flat noses or thick lips like that.
>>4502169i keep them the same, because they are the same as us
>>4502169N
>>4502185I'd bump up the right ones shadows in post if you're picking up what I'm putting down
>>4502169Holy shit, that got to be the niggest of them all.Also: Why would I want to take a foto of a nigger.
>>4502169CCTV uses auto settings.
>>4503942I
It's like taking a picture of a sewage, go to your local sewege and spend an evening capturing whatever you find
>>4502169I'm not interested in wildlife photography, so no.
>>4502169If I were to to shoot a darkie I would blast them with a fill flash to illuminate them if lighting needed it. Negroes can be quite dark at times, but you know what else is dark? Actual "black" objects like a mousepad, a camera body, lens, etc and you know what? those photograph just fine. Same with literal coal miners covered in fucking coal. It's all just shades of grey and unless it's something like vantablack, it's not pure black, and your camera should pick up details just fine.Every single instance of a darkie in a photo or video being too dark to see (when not clearly in shadow in a high contrast scene) is literally just overbaked fake contrast added in post-processing or a camaera preset used by retarded JPEG shooters that crushes shadows and applies non-linear curves that crush shadows and highlights.If you want inky blacks, you need a scene with real contrast. A black person standing next to a lighter skinned person, including a literal albino, is never and was never high contrast scene.Pic related is more how that image should actually look.>>4502185Lay off the lightroom or in-camera processing and you won't have to "bump up" anything. Unnatural fake contras is not the default look. That's the slop look. If that's part of your workflow, you're doing it wrong.
