[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_5985.jpg (883 KB, 1502x1179)
883 KB
883 KB JPG
We know that original Kodachrome isnt coming back due to the toxic chemicals used in developing rolls, but why arent Kodak or any other film manufacturer creating a new film stock that looks like Kodachrome? Is it really impossible to create other film stocks than these hazy yellow tinted pissy stocks available now?

Ektar is way too red, Portra and Gold too yellow, Ektachrome too blue and so forth.

Deep black shadows, punchy reds and yellows, good contrast, perfect blues, lots of black in all colors. No weird general color tint.

If a Kodachrome copy was launched it would be a fucking goldmine $$ for Kodak or whomever launched it.
>>
>>4503466
Who cares
you fix it in post anyways.
>>
https://nikonpc.com/

here



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.