>15 years old>still produces more appealing images than any modern compact cameraHow did Leica pull this off?
>>4504611Could you post some examples
>>4504611because of the red circle badge duh. Photos like most art in general are all about context of the creator, the tool they used, and subject matter last. It's why for instance, a frail violinist that can barely hold their stradivarius up from their wheelchair will still earn far more recognition and applause than any healthy nonamer with noname instrument playing 10/10 in a blind test.
>>4504611>still produces more appealing images than any modern compact camera>only picture posted is of the cameraInteresting
>>4504623>>4504659Do you need to be spoonfed everything? Try using google maybe
>>4504671Nta but I googled and all the pictures suck donkey balls, you were wrong anon sorry its not a good camera after all and leica failed. Luckily I did my own rrsearch here. I can also vouch for this info for other anons so you dont need to google
>>4504671You made a thread with a grand claim without providing examples. You made a shitpost.
>>4504676Of course he did, stop giving him attention.
>>4504611>be OP>be 39 years old>still produces useless shitpost-tier threads on an Albanian Beetroot Growers forum
>>4504611It doesntAlan schaller or whatever for example uses a leica to produce some of the most dogshit photographs. I would rather go to a gallery shot by /p/‘s own huskyfag and doghair sharing a sony a7iii.
>>4504700Oh wait thats the d-luxYeah that one sucks shit too. Looks like phone photos.
>>4504700>>4504701>yeah it sucks because um... it just does OKAYWhy do Leicas always attract these retarded contrarian opinions?Don't worry anon, I'm sure there's a recipe for your X100 that looks just as good!
>>4504611Its just a rebadged panny LX
>leicaman thread>no photosIts been memed to death and still true every time
>>4504611That is not the Ricoh GR Digital (2008)
>>4504847It's like poetry it rhymes
