Man, Myth, Legend
Welcome Back Crew
No Sleeping on Duty
I'd like to see Pinkasov thread or Helmut thread
Adventure Ahead
Opiate of the Masses
Potato R/D Center
Back to the story.We will be entering logging countryRiver transit, Homes, rail transport etc.Love this picrel
Log transition point Stock on far end of Lake
>>4506977I wish there was more detail on the technicalities and logistics of what he did with these colour photos. But alas. At least it's a wonderful collection we can still enjoy.
ty for continuing and posting more OP, the last thread was really cool
>>4507025:)
construction zone
pointed stakes animal control
I love trichromes. These are cool.
>>4507069Thanks fren
>>4506987awesome thousand hungry weilins approaching and i has two pouch rice and some greens
>>4506998do you mean fabric weave factory
Based thread is back>>4507091This looks flimsy as fuck
>>4507094 that room tho>>4507095 :)>>4507144Thanks anon. Yea It does and I was thinking,it is likely a small sub circuit route over a temporary causeway.Only a small loco and one or two cars. ai "A causeway is a raised road or railway built across a low, wet area, marshland, or body of water. Constructed from materials like earth, masonry, or concrete, it provides a solid, dry passage that connects separated land areas. They are commonly used to connect islands to the mainland or cross tidal areas.
>>4507021Previous thread had some decent discussion/info about that stuff. Apparently he used a specially formulated orthochromatic emulsion that he partially developed to take these.
>>4507021Developed the formula for. He didn't partially develop the negatives.
>>4507095yea. I post here alone and just start making things up.It was a bad pun on potato/vodka stereotypes.
These are nice homes. That trim tho
Based Onion Dome Bale
>>4507243The colours look great in this one despite the broken sheet.
>>4507252yea, I like the un-cropped ones best.a lot more variety in the render
>>4506980>Welcome Back CrewExcept you, two weeks in the brig.
>>4507366epic lol dubb's checked"Sir, we told him to stand still"
Great Shot imo
Tried for a larger res on this set
This is very exciting. I have never seen these.It really will be an adventure.:)
I did a rough scan of the 1400. I was mostly looking for people shots
one of the trichromes I tried back in the dayused R,G,B flash gels lol
>>4509955checkedimo that is a Great Photo.Nice Ballance, catching the branch on the top just filled the whole image in.Part perfect focus and others where the tri effect gives that expected distortion.Nice add to the thread,and thanks for the bumpHave some /Gorsky/:)
>>4506994Reminds me of one of my favourite photos 'The Onion Field' taken by George Davison around 1890.
>>4510030yes I can see
>>4510194exquisite >>4510182really niceI think he has the eye of a 19th century landscape artist. he was also so fortunate to witness such beautiful village landscapes rather than our modern cities. it really inspires me to travel. I wonder what focal length lenses would give a similar angle of view on 35mm film? or if there is any information about the optics he used? Wikipedia, here I come…
>>4510220that first pic is cool cause you can see the Stores on the main streetsone straight thru town and the other in the buildings in the foreground.You can truly get lost looking at them in Hi Res.I wish I could walk into one of those shops.The camera Mr. Gorsky used is an ongoing mystery.Why he took no photos of his gear is strange.I will double check in the B/W folder of single frame pics he tookMay be an overlooked clue??
I intend to document most of the Empire here in this forum.
Further down the line.
why climb this mountain anon?>it had to be done
Based onion dome bales
more later
>>4510364the perspective on this one is greatI wonder if he was on a raised platform?
>>4510370a really excellent photo, i love this view. that tower is so unusual, both the form and the color.>>4510382very humble garb.
>>4510384It looks like a station in RDR2do you know this game??Wonder what it looks like now??
>>4510383They walked up this hill in the foreground and to the right.>>4510359You can just see a small dome also on the right. Here is some hemp for you trouble
Landscaping
These are in order.I think that means something.Different moods, lighting etc. when you hit that spot you can't stop clickingThis one is Great
Movin on
Blessed thread
>>4510550if you know the location we could probably compare these shots with satellite photosi would be surprised if this hasn't all been developed into a communist concretescapebut I really don't know all that much about russianever played rdr2
now that you mention video games, a lot of these landscapes do actually remind me of some locations from the witcher 3
>>4510586Thanks >>4510731I can find most of the locations with the image name at the LOC (Library of Congress).I found no photos of his gear, Yet.This is his office desk in Paris. Strange how this Photo Madman has almost zero photos in his old age.office picrel
>>4510731Also I have this to offer. An excellent video journey to some of these locations today.It is a 1hr 30 documentary on Gorsky and specifically these photos..It is in Russian, but the captions will help when you need them.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaeRj-ApktYbest way to see this in real time
previous thread here>>4505507>>4505507>>4505507
>>4510731damn it was a bitch but I found itai You are likely referring to the town of Sim (or its associated rail station, Simskaya), located in the Ashinsky District of Chelyabinsk Oblast in the Ural region of Russiasome of the Russian text at the LOC is BS. untranslatable gibberish
fyiI have a torrent of the whole collection
Something about seeing towns when they're still small and surrounded by nature just looks so fascinating to me. Thanks for the photos anon!
>>4510979size? you should start a thread on /t/ if you have a few collections
>>4511052Thanks for taking the time Friend
>>45110592g it has everything I have and sorted to a degreepic rel
>>4511119/t/I was there for several years :)Some of the better pho/t/o sets are still seeded.here is the hash if you want it716bf3d6a2447343ecc2ddceb6cc2601c37759b2
>>4511111i got the get
posted in the old thread because that's what I had openbut Gorsky almost certainly used a single lens, sliding plate setupthere's no evidence of chromatic parallax in any of the photos, aside from a couple where the camera was obviously accidentally moved like >>4506509(there is some lateral CA visible in high-contrast areas but that's most likely because the lenses were designed for B&W only)there is significant evidence of movement between shots, so regardless of the physical camera setup the images were taken sequentiallythe extra softness in the top & bottom photos may be caused by the order they were taken in, with the center one first, then the magazine tolerance loosening up as the next two shots were takenyou'd have to look at the frames of a shot with linear movement like >>4506108 or clouds to order thembut there's not many of those, Gorsky avoided those scenes/situations for obvious reasonsa magazine like Miethe's setup >>4505938 might allow a delay of only seconds between frames
>>4511153>>4511153I posted there alsoYour text is different my reply is unchanged.Thank for your input and I can't argue with the logic.A closer comparison to other three frames would be important.If the declination in framing observed in the sample I gave is consistently present,I would say no to the theory.You would not move the base the same way each time in other locations for other shots.My description includes your offset angles approach.Center lens straighttop lens 20 degrees downbottom lens 20 degrees up.Odd none of his gear was in any photos. The Mirthe camera seems gigantic and cumbersome. I don't see how you could slide into the next frame regularlywithout a noticeable difference in border framing.The weight of that slide device with the huge glass plateon the back of that camera is enormous and may be the answer.>but all I've seen is from stuff moving in-frame in different colors, which also implies multiple shots on a single lens.Time is also an issue here.timing for three different exposures, lets calculate the time for three frames versus one.Then compare the ghosting (color shift) you see in a non cropped example.That much time between getting all three shots and you have nothing but a blur.Forget the grass waving in the breezeAs I said you made good points but I have also and am not convinced yet,
I made a slideshow of some of thesea while back.link for anyone who is interestedhttps://www.bitchute.com/video/ugPuZKa43h4x
>>4511164>>4511165>If the declamation in framing observed in the sample I gave is consistently present,>I would say no to the theory.>You would not move the base the same way each time in other locations for other shots.assuming Gorsky used a cassette/magazine setup like Miethe, it's very likely it had index marks or detentsif the indices were slightly off, then each image taken in the same position in that particular cassette/magazine would have the same offsets (I expect he had more than one)>My description includes your offset angles approach.>Center lens straight>top lens 20 degrees down>bottom lens 20 degrees up.not sure what you mean by my "offset angles"you can't correct parallax by tilting the camera or shifting the frustum, the only way to "correct" it is to take the photo from the same exact positionI tried illustrating what I mean by making some trichromes on a tripod with a vertical telescoping sectiongreen was center, red -5", blue +5"(digital camera, I isolated only the channel I needed for each image, then aligned & added)pic related is shift with no angle adjustment for upper & lower camerasthings in the distance are okay, but the chromatic parallax quickly gets worse the closer the object is to the camera (the worst being my balcony railing)
>>4511195this picture was taken the same as before, except I reoriented the camera to point at the same feature for the top & bottom viewschromatic parallax is very slightly diminished, but I had to quickly flip between the two photos to even notice
>>4511197finally I took this picture as a control, with no vertical shift, all three in the same positionthe only visible CA is temporalI really wish I had better clouds for this
>>4511198>>4511197OkThe work and time is appreciated. I am not protecting a position here.We still have two issuesThree frames. They all have a slightly different field of view. pic relThey have the same anomaly, all of them doCenter straight on subjectTop slightly down Bottom slightly upWe need to agree on this point in some way.If the camera and tripod is unmoveable in granite and the "glass slide"is free, it does not matter where you click the next frame. even if slightly off center.You would always be able to super impose the correct portion on top of each other ExactlyThat does not work here. Picrel will not super impose ever and it is not movingYou say the slide is off center From Top to bottom in all the examples,How is that changing the lens. The placement of the slide is somehow affecting what the lens is capturing and in focus?The pics you took do not take in the other factors in displaying the images in the lantern,with three additional lenses.Imo crudely bending/blending the images back together on a wall or sheetWe have to get past this lens math issue first.How exactly are the three images changing?? This is not a bump off center with the neg.
>>4511293sorry not really clear on what you're saying>That does not work here. Picrel will not super impose ever and it is not movingI don't see any parallax there though?they overlap just fine>You say the slide is off center From Top to bottom in all the examples,that's the opposite of what I'm sayingI'm trying to show that Gorsky probably used a single fixed lens + sliding plate, otherwise you would see artifacts like >>4511195 and >>4511197which I don't see in any of the pictures posted so far>The pics you took do not take in the other factors in displaying the images in the lantern,with three additional lenses.I was actually going to draw a diagram of the projector but didn't have timeyou need three lenses for the projector so that a human can see all three images at onceand using three lenses for the projector doesn't cause any chromatic parallax once they've been focused onto the projection medium, because they're projecting flat surfaces (the plates)you would get chromatic parallax from three lenses _taking_ the photo because the original scene has depth, but the projected plates do notsorry this is hard to explain with just words
>>45113571 lensI large negative camera fixed like a rockWhy are three the images moving position?Why are all three images NOT DEAD CENTERThe lens DID NOT MOVEDO NOT USE THE WORD PARALLAX You seem to have problems understanding the pointWhy are three the images moving position?Why are all three images NOT DEAD CENTERThe lens DID NOT MOVE
later the afternoon:the only camera in existence that can't take a duplicate photothis is dialogue is becoming troll likeOthers like you come here and ask stupid shit and waste my time.You tried to explane this in several circles and refuse to answer direct questionsI have photos. All types. Some came from fliker. No concern for approval of my threads by the aristocracy on /p/ I will continue to make threads until I get board. I break no rules and so it will continueI guess me not being "one of you" gets the grief posts going
>>4511462>boardBoard as in board of peace, I.e. bored?
>>4506984This is quite the technical feat. The dogs didn't move in the three shots he had to take. Impressive.
>>4511468god the stereotypes here
here is a fuckin bush
>>4511468is that your go to line still ??shit worked well here 15yrs agocool old school
the fuck happened in here>>4511439>>4511462just because you disagree, or don't understand it, doesn't make it trollinghere, I took the time to illustrate what I'm talking about: registration error in the plate cassetteunfortunately the image limit is reached, so have a catbox link: https://files.catbox.moe/hypoht.png
>>4511609I apologise to you.I am currently maintaining multiple active threads here and other places. Grief posters and bots are almost all that remain.Grammar Nazi shows up to egg shit on >>4511468as an example.Your Diagram took a lot of time. It was very well done.The RGB overlap was also odd and you showed how they stack in the finished crop. Bottom portion left is spot on.Ya done good Friend. Very Nice. And yes, words did not work here.I was always a tactile learner.In my own defence I did honestly engage in the previous posts we madelooking for the right answer.Thank You for your time, effort and knowledge. (recap on projector comments) This is the reason the projector works like it does with the three stacked images.Tilting a projected 2D image even slightly starts to create image distortion.The top and bottom lens on the projector are tilted to combine the images.Those two angles are in the IMAGES to help compensate for the distortion.or am i just retarded again ?Any way it was a learning experience and those are always good days.:)
>>4511609>>4511641the next thread will take some timeneed to afkfor obvious reasons
