Bridges EditionFormer: >>4517511
Too far away
>>4519819Why are you dickheads not posting in the landscape general
>>4519872there is no landscape generalthere's a thread pretending to be a well-established thread known as a general, but it has yet to earn its place. the /rpt/ has been around a lot longer than any so-called general on this board.
>>4519954this image pops! good stuff
snapshits from the park
>>4519957
>>4519959
snaps from a walk
>>4519964
>>4519965
>>4519966
I just thought it was neat.
>>4520014>rotated the wrong wayWell shieeet. First time that's happened to me in a long time, now I feel like a dumbass. Left is down.
>>4519821>>4519931I posted>>4519723I also use a Minolta SR-T with either a 45mm or 50mm lens for B&W Film Photography. I use Ilford 400ISO film for that. Don't ask me which 400 iso film I use. I have a bunch of rolls in the refrigerator. I don't shoot with film as much anymore. I develop the negative here at the house, scan it on a CanoScan 9000 something or other, then process it. It scans as a .tiff file so that there are the digital layers like in a RAW photo
>>4519964>>4519965>>4519966>>4519967Damn, what camera, lens and eventual presets?
>>4520078GFX50R, the first shot is adapted Soligor 28/2 (sort of covers the kino crops, falls apart beyond the FF sensor coverage, this was f11. I kinda like the look, but its absolutely ridiculous wide open - picrel), the rest is Mitakon 65, processed in spektrafilm.
>>4520066Technically banjoes have bridges. Hopefully I don't get eaten by a pun goblin in my sleep tonight. Protect me, my boy Raphael. The night is gloomy and rank