>>514829745the celts were completely driven out of england by the anglo saxons, who can from modern day denmark, which is the same place as the vikings and normans. The modern englishman is 100% danish
>>514829745all of those groups considered themselves scythian. nobody knows why but point is they considered themselves to have a common origin. they were probably mistaken in what that origin was or maybe modern historians are the ones who got it all wrong. i trust modern historians more than some egotistical dumbfuck king from 1000 years ago.
>>514829745Ingurlund was also colonized by Roman’s too thoughbeit His assessment is not accurate
>>514829899>the celts were completely driven out of england by the anglo saxons, who can from modern day denmark, which is the same place as the vikings and normans. The modern englishman is 100% danishI have never seen so many false statements made in so short a sentence.
>>514830602its all true, the celts were driven into scotland, wales and cornwall, this is a fact no one even disputes
>>514830674Even the English in the Southern and Eastern parts of England which would have experienced the highest proportion of Anglo-Saxon & Jute settlement are mostly Native Briton or "Celtic" as many say.
>>514830875cornwall is the only place in england that had celts, native britons were genocided completely with 0 genetics remaning by the yamnaya invasions
>>514830999It is weird to me calling the Britons "Celts" as I tend to associate that label with the Gauls. But by Britons or Native Britons I mean the Celtic pre-Anglo-Saxon invasions population of Britain.
>>514829899>the celts were completely driven out of england by the anglo saxonslol no
>>514829745>>514830875This is objectively wrong. English people are plotted by three major components:Iron Age BritonAnglo-SaxonMedieval FrenchThe largest constituent part of the majority is Anglo-Saxon, the reason people think otherwise is because they don't understand statistical data. The vast majority live in the South East, the people there draw the majority of their DNA from Anglo-Saxons. The retards who saw the study confused regional averages for population averages. Also I included (You) in this post because you're a fucking retard, gcYVpdxL.
>>514830398They all share the same origins, just different infusion densities due to Saxons arriving last.
>>514829899more or less.i'm more scandi than anything else
>>514829745what about the cheddar man? we is english too
>>514831369cheddar man - 1998, blond englishmancheddar man - 2020, as imagined by two 'dutch' kikes with diagnosed schizophrenia - coal black rubber lipped nigger
>>514831139the druids were the native britons and there genetic lineage was completely wiped out by the yamnaya with 0% of it remaining>>514831185its true, you can be mad all you want>>514831341scandis also conqoured spain via the visigoths so you are correct though you were then conquered by the arabs for 400 years and are all brown becasue of being rapebabies
>>514829745>>514830398See picrel>>514830999That's bullshit. Other studies claimed most Britons are of the original stock and that Saxons and Celts left less of an impact than previously believed. And Romans left almost nothing.
>>514829745everyone knows that - as long as they are White
>>514831369Ash sarkar is still around
>>514831499https://tomwalker.substack.com/p/the-cheddar-man-scam-indigenous-western?s=rhttps://archive.md/ksx1vhttps://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/who-cheddar-man-mesolithic-skeleton-shares-dna-british-history-teacherhttps://mymodernmet.com/cheddar-man-relative/
>>514831578>Romans left almost nothing.thats exactly what i am saying, when the anglos invaded, they completelyed pushed everyone else out to cornwall, wales and scotland and were genetically identical to both the vikings and normans, old english and old norse were mutually intelligible
Calling in all Haploautists and Admixureautists from /his/.Set these niggers straight, shatter their fragile perceptions.
There are two tiers of anglo. There is the majority underclass of Celt Saxon mutts ruled over by a Norman elite. These guys kept it pure until the 19th century when many fell on hard times and were forced to marry WASP and Jewish heiresses.
>>514831820What does this mean, can you explain?
>>514830398the celts used to be the cimmerians and the saxons used to be the scythians.both are the lost tribes of israel and are God's chosen people
>>514831214That view is archaic and outdated. The Celtic "genocide" of England was the theory before the advent of genetic testing.The English speak a Germanic language but by blood are mostly "Celtic." As has been born out by every genetic study.
>>514832220forgot link>Identifying Biblical Israel https://archive.org/details/identifying-biblical-israel-today-e-book/mode/2up
>>514829745Only jealous nonwhites say "mutt"
>Source: TRUST ME BROWhat?
>>514831535The Druids were "Celtic" and Indo-European they were descendants of the yamnaya.
>>514832421lmao no, you are so fucking wrong its unreal
>>514829745Normans weren't a distinct ethnic group. They were just Scandinavian and French.
>>514832421>Indo-Europeanthe proto indo europeans aka the aryans were the descendants of Adam and eve. the book of genesis is the history of the aryans told from the Aryan Hebrew perspective as opposed to modern history that's told from the ancient Greek perspective
I'll tell you what, whatever the English are, they're spiritual kikes.
>>514832464The Celtic languages are Indo-European languages.
>>514829745that's pretty much the make up of early America.
>>514829745This is inaccurate, it's missing 2 important components of the racial hierarchy in bongland60% - jeets/pakis (same shit, pun intended)30% - africans 10% - everyone else
>>514829745Sure am a mutt. Still whiter than you, faggot.
>>514831369AYO!! ALL MA NIGGAS BE CHEEDAR BRUH
>>514832579lol
>>514829899>the celts were completely driven out of england by the anglo saxons, who can from modern day denmark, which is the same place as the vikings and normans. The modern englishman is 100% danishThis is not true at all, its actually much worse, the latest data shows most Englishmen are 80-100% Briton.They arent Germanic, like at all.>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05247-2
>>514832595the only 2 European languages that supposedly aren't indo European are Hungarian and Finnish. amazingly, Swedish has more in common with Indian than it does Finnish supposedly because Indian and Swedish are indo European languages
>>514832871the celts were pushed into Wales and Scotland when the Anglo Saxons came. obviously some will have stayed and mixed but most got pushed supposedly according to history (his story)
>>514832871You are wrong>https://x.com/Tom_Rowsell/status/1960986385701061094
Everyone is mutts. Unless one is inbred to the point of disabled/hapsburg or most cousin marrying Muslim communities.
>>514829745Why didn't the Romans leave their genetic footprint in the people's they conquered. Why aren't Anglos 2% roman
>>514833140One layperson on twitter or multiple genetic studies? Hmmm.
>>514829745There is literally no Viking or Norman DNA at all in England. No roman either. These groups left zero genetic legacy here.
>>514833604because Roman soldiers were supposed to be celebate like their modern day counterparts i.e Roman (catholic) priests
>>514829745There's basically no genetic difference in celts and anglos at the time. It was a linguistic and cultural distinction more than genetic.
>>514829899>The modern englishman is 100% danishI am regularly in Denmark for work, we are not the same people at all
>>514829745Mixing is only bad between races/species. Inside there's no problem since is the same genepool.
>>514834159when I worked at Siemens there were like 50 games come over to show us how to make wind turbine blades. when I started working there I co uldnt tell who was Danish and who was English until they spoke
>>514833080no, they werent. Maybe they were linguistically because Anglo-Saxons could not penetrate into Wales but the Britons never left.Anglo-Saxon/English culture comes from elite dominance by German males.This is not to say the Britons were totally useless slave cattle, the Sutton Hoo man was an ethnic Briton with Briton paternity and was mostly Briton by admixture.But the English arent Germanic ethnically, they are definitively indigenous to the isles.>>514833140Rowsell is coping. He didnt even marry a British woman, he married a Swede because he has mutt syndrome.hes also a literal bongsmoking pseudo reformed degenerate.I think he does good work. But its a doomed endeavor to push this "English are Germanic" meme.>but if they arent Germanic what can they cling toHow about the English BUILD SOMETHING NEW.The History and the Legacy and the Culture and the Legends of the English race lie in the Future not in the past.There was a time when Viking heritage laid before the very first pirates who carved their dragon ships, and look at their legacy today.Build something new, pivot to an indigenous English people.
>>514834326>games*Danes
>>514834333>Anglo-Saxon/English culture comes from elite dominance by German males.before the Norman conquest. the last Anglo Saxon king was over a thousand years ago
>>514834326You must be faceblind, the Danish even have different colouring to us too (high instance of blonde hair and and orange hued skin). They have a low instance of dark brown hair which is common here.
>>514834489I didnt notice the skin thing. but we have blonde and red haired English people so I couldnt tell of someone was English or Danish just by their hair colour. I suppose if one had brown hair I could say they probably weren't Danish
>>514834489although some of the Danes did have brown hair
>>514829745Oh it's the Jewish DNA police who want to tell everyone that they are something they are not, how convenient it's all owned by Jews, definitely not suspicious guys and you should totally believe that spit test is genuine, especially when it's been in the hands of a trusty Jew, in a Jewish lab that has no agenda, at all.
>>514834701this faggot is correct. there's only 3 races. Caucasoid, negroid and chinkoid. everyone else is a mixture of these 3 races.
>>514830999That is conpletely false. 1. The Anglo Saxons did not conpletely displace the Celts from any part of the British Isles. They mostly mixedwith them. The Rbglish o ly have a slightly higher genetic makeup of Anglo Sacon than the Welsh, Scottish, Irish and Cornish. The English a tually have the second higher perce tage of their genetic makeup derived from the western Hunter Gathers of the British Isles, with inly the Scottish having a higher percentage. The Englihs have the highest percentage of Neolithic Farmer DNA of all British Isles native ethnic groups.>Another anti-white bites the dust.
>>514835043this 1pbtid brother war bait thread is fulfilling its maximum potential with you faggots taking it all serious like
>>514829899>>514833080Wrong you utter retard, they were genocided and raped thoroughly.Celtards deserve it thoever, they're the ones who invited them in the first place as mercenaries to fight the Picts.
>>51482974550% Sephardic.
the celts and saxons are brothers. they are both sons of israel. and i mean true israel, not to be confused with the fake jewish settlement in the middle east>Identifying Biblical Israel https://archive.org/details/identifying-biblical-israel-today-e-book/mode/2up>Anglo Saxon Celts were Israelites.https://revealingthetruth.weebly.com/anglo-saxon-celts-were-israelites.html>Britain and America: Sons of Joseph.https://www.cbcg.org/booklets/america-britain/chapter-ten-celtic-saxon-israel-moves-into-northwest-europe-british-isles.html
>>514829745those are all just slightly different flavors of north west european
>>514829745Haha brits are white. White. White and ... White... Shame we aren't mullato, Mexican, Guatemalan and Indian.
>>514835430understanding that we are israel is the key to decoding biblical prophecy. if you believe the masons and zionists rule the world and are forcing biblical prophecy then knowing where you stand with regards to the prophecies is very important indeed
>>514835749Come on man, the British are not "Israel" that is silly. Two completely different races. Hebrews are a Middle Eastern people, the British are a European people.
Jews are schizophrenic.
>>514829745brits are a mix of the best white genes
>>514829745I'm white, you're not.
>>514836038the aryans (proto indo europeans) landed in the middle East after the flood. everyone in the book of genesis was aryan. the egyptians, babylonians, hebrews, everyone. the middle East today has been blacked so jist cos they're shitskins today doesn't mean they always were. assuming the middle East was brown because it is today is like saying ausralia was always white cos it is today. people move
>>514829745>Still cannot grasp the difference between Anglo and Anglo-SaxonYou're a fucking retard, OP.
>>514836092we are the union of jacob. we are all the tribes of israel come together. we are israel>What is truly fascinating is that as the House of Israel passed from history having been taken captive by the Assyrians in the seventh century BC and resettled in northern Persia south of the Caucasus Mountains, the Celts and Scythians (Saxons) suddenly burst into recorded history coming from the same direction the Israelites had been settled!https://revealingthetruth.weebly.com/anglo-saxon-celts-were-israelites.html> Archeology has solved two of the greatest archeological problems — first, what happened to the hundreds of thousands of Israelites who disappeared south of the Caucasus? And second — what was the origin of the Cimmerians and the mysterious nomadic tribes known as “Scythians” who “suddenly” appeared north of the Caucasus – both at the same time in history? They were one and the same people — they were Israelites.https://christiansfortruth.com/heirs-of-the-promise-what-happened-to-the-ten-lost-northern-tribes-of-israel>"The Celts were the first European people north of the Alps to emerge into recorded history. But the first references to them appear in the sixth and fifth centuries BC when they began to encounter the peoples of the Mediterranean cultures….” (The Celtic Empire, Peter Ellis, 1990, Pg 9)>In 1723, the French church scholar and Huguenot refugee, Dr. Jacques Abbadie, wrote a book titled, ‘The Triumph of Providence’ in which he stated, "Unless the ten tribes of Israel are flown into the air, or sunk into the earth, they must be those ten Gothic tribes that entered Europe in the fifth century BC..."
>>514829745How is it that the ancient celtic DNA is supposedly so prevalent but Anglo so low? How is Norman so low as well? 1000 years since the conqueror. I mean there has to Norman DNA even among Americans in the south.
>>514829745London, Paris, and Berlin are right next to each other.
>>514836038WE WUZ ISRAELITES N SHIEEEEEETfuck no i am no goddamn fucking kike, all of my family is straight outta Danelaw, ya'll>longship on land with chrome spinning logs underneath.jpg
>>514836583the thing is we can't trust published DNA research
>>514836038europa is a semite godess
>>514836583Because it's a fabrication. Also irrelevant because the term 'Anglo-Saxon' was only used after the mixing of Anglos and Celts. The term, for all intents and purposes, refers to modern day English people and not the people inhabiting the places the English originally came from. Someone from Saxony in Germany isn't an Anglo-Saxon, for example.
>>514833930That has to be bullshit. Do the math man. Ancient DNA is always going to whither away. Normans formed the countries patriarchy. You don't all descend from peasants. People rose and fell from class for centuries, some born high some born low.
Post the top gear meme, that's all the anthropology you need
>>514834473Elite dominance is a type of class structure, it is not solely whoever is king.
>>514836583Composed primarily of Norsemen and Rus' for the first 100 years, the Guard began to see increased numbers of Anglo-Saxons after the Norman conquest of England. By the time of the Emperor Alexios Komnenos in the late 11th century, the Varangian Guard was largely recruited from Anglo-Saxons and "others who had suffered at the hands of the Vikings and their cousins the Normans". The Anglo-Saxons and other Germanic peoples shared with the Vikings a tradition of faithful (to death if necessary) oath-bound service, and the Norman invasion of England resulted in many fighting men who had lost their lands and former masters and were looking for positions elsewhere.
>>514836659>WE WUZ ISRAELITES N SHIEEEEEETyup>fuck no i am no goddamn fucking kikekikes aren't Israelites. or at least they weren't. they've been breeding their daughters with our sons on purpose to bleach their cursed blood with that of our true Israelite blood for hundreds of years now though
>>514829745The 2022 genetic study on modern English people, published by Nature, showed that the average English person is some combination of 25-47% Anglo-Saxon (some of that could have come from later Scandinavian influence because the Angles, Saxons and Jutes were really similar), 14-57% pre-Saxon Briton, and the remainder, if any, is filled by French influence from after the Anglo-Saxon invasion. The study also showed that people of 100% pre-Saxon Briton dna were buried in the same way that an Anglo-Saxon might be buried, with items indicating the same status as other Anglo-Saxons.All of this means that the Anglo-Saxons came on large numbers, but they didn’t replace or genocide the natives. The two groups heavily mixed and the Britons in England assimilated to Anglo-Saxon culture. Then, probably at several points afterward, Frenchmen came in waves to further affect the English gene pool (Frankish migrants, the Normans, the Huguenots, etc.).
>>514836732that sounds exactly like the kike shit they (aging, vile, disgusting old communist hag at oxford) tried to push 10 years ago to disparage our ancestors, gtfo of here with that crap
>>514836839Pic related: Red = Anglo-Saxon, blue = Briton, green = French. If I messed anything up, I’m sure an anon will correct me.
>>514836839>>514836869Furthermore, the Celts of Britain are different from those of Continental Europe.>David Reich's laboratory found that 90% of Britain's Neolithic gene pool was overturned by a population from North Continental Europe characterised by the Bell Beaker culture around 1200 BC who carried a large amount of Yamnaya ancestry from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, including the R1b Haplogroup. This population lacked genetic affinity to other Bell Beaker populations, such as the Iberian Bell Beakers, but appeared to be an offshoot of the Corded Ware single grave people. It is currently unknown whether these Beaker peoples went on to develop Celtic languages in the British Isles, or whether later Celtic migrations introduced Celtic languages to Britain>The close genetic affinity of these Beaker people to Continental North Europeans means that British and Irish populations cluster genetically very closely with other Northwest European populations, regardless of how much Anglo-Saxon and Viking ancestry was introduced during the 1st century
>>514836815indeed but it is also international. just cos our royal family came from Germany doesn't make them German. the royal houses of europe are all related. their true origin goes back to Solomon and king David
>>514829899Not really I would say englishmen from the north and east of england and around the kent area can be said to be majority anglo saxons, but in areas like bath, cornwall, wales, and the midlands it is much more mixed bag with celtic people as well.Funnily enough all the current scots that pretend to be highlanders aren't highlanders they are descendants of the lowlanders that murdered and took the highlanders land.Look into the highland clearances if you want to know more.The british isles are so rich in history I love reading about them.
>>514837037I have a genealogy of all the kings and queens dating back to biblical times but I can't be arsed to find it since no-one will even look at it
>>514836830I understand the term Anglo Saxon is a generalization but there's truth to it. The left just hates Anglo. Even Americans hate Anglo and say we are all German. People hate the English, that's just how it is. I'm paternally German but a good half English and consider it my culture more than any other.
>>514837261that's because divide and conquor. they don't want you to love your roots. they want to hate your ancestors. they forced a brother war because no taxation without representation so they could tax you instead
>>514836839>>514836869>>514836971
>>514837137I always though Edward III was the biggest patriarch of the English people, I mean so much of that offspring would have spread everywhere and into the lower class
>>514837261the way I heard it was the jewish jesuits in Rome were terrified Britain would dominate the world if it had the American colonies as part of its empire. so they orchestrated a little brother war to seperate them
>>514837261we are all Germanic peopleslanguage: english (west/low germanic, same as dutch, frisian, platt german).culture, gentotypes, customs, even histories are partly or wholly connectedi believe its more important than ever now as we face foreign and hostile invaders at our doorstep, and are constantly attacked from within. i feel our survival hinges on galvanizing all of us as the one race and people that we arelook no further than the anti white general that one pirate flag anon was making to see the clear danger at present. lesser people want us destroyed out of pure spite and envy
>>514837482
>>514837751it's amazing how they managed to get passport photos of all those cavemen from caveman times
>>514837641I think generalizing everyone as Germanic (not german) is stupid though because we are skipping so many distinct cultures and ethnic groups. Germans in Europe were so diverse that even generalizing them is dumb.
>>514837872i see what you mean, but that's not to marginalize any one in particular. i say as a classification, like how we do with animals (phylum class, order, sub order, etc...)not to band then together indiscriminately (like your complaint), but to order them as neighbors by ways and means of the traits i listed earlier
>>514833080>(his story)His Torah*
>>514837751
>>514837872also German just means genuine or something similar in Latin. the Romans classed them as the genuine scythians and not those who filled their old scythian lands after they moved into western Europe
>>514838157
>>514838189
>>514838466
>>514838507
>>514838507for those of you that don't know>wessex, sussex, essexwest saxons, south saxons, east saxons kingdomsit took me awhile to make that connection till i stumbled over it one say
British DNA has to have at least some nordic germanic DNA as they are huge cucks. Being a cuck is a nordic/germanic trait.
>>514839163>SaxonThe name Saxon itself is derived from the original Hebrew Saka-suni and means son of Saks or Isaac’s sons. In Documents of Destiny by F.Wallace Connon (London; 1958, p. 102) it is recorded, “Dr. Holt Yates says:‘The word Saxon comes from sons of Isaac,’ and he gives Saac, Saak, Saach, Saax, Saach-en and shows that in many Eastern languages sons of is often written sunnia, which would give sons of Isaac as Saac-sunnia.4 It is universally accepted by modern historians that the Iskuza were called “Shuthae” by the Greeks and “Sacae” (also “Saka” and “Sakka”) by the Persians. Herodotus furthers tells us the Persians called the Sacae, “Scythians.”5 In reviewing the Royal Correspondence of the Assyrian Empire it is evident that the “Iskuza,” the “Sakka,” the “Scythians,” the “Cimmerians,” and the “Gimiri” are all Israelites.6
>>514839484Picrel is a sax or german sachs.
>>514829745all humans are mutts you mongoloid
>>514839810>all humans are mutts you mongoloidCorrect. Also it amazes me how these dumbasses don't stop to think where Germanics and Celtics come from, because if they did, they would know that their ancestors are the Bell Beaker people, who were all around Europe doing trade through Europe's river networks, making them ethnic cousins.
>>514829745this just means they're now allowed to say nigger and nigger without consequences, lefties should say they're sorry and kneel and take the violence without fighting back
>>514830674Can confirm. My family left for the New World from Wales and I am Celtic. Red hair, green eyes and everything.
>>514839789sæxi was just about to post that. saxons named so for the knives they carried
>>514829899cope angloid you've never truly defeated the brittonic romans
>>514829745He forgot Romans who enrich their gene pool too.
Nordic > Roman/med > Germanic/alpine > celtic
>>514840004Only race is real.
>60% spartanBased.
>>514841097anglos are a race, they are a people, a civilization
>>514829745100% Yamnaya
>>514829745>ANGLOS ARE MUTTS TOOAccording to my dna test I'm mostly Scandinavian (parents from the north of england).I plan on going to Norway and talk loudly and constantly of having returned home and being amongst family while being obviously British and completely oblivious to their cultural ways.
>>514841954You should learn Danish so you can be loud in it to them.
>>514841954>I plan on going to Norway and talk loudly and constantly of having returned home and being amongst family while being obviously British and completely oblivious to their cultural ways.What it is to be an American in Europe.
>>514841954settle down with a nice Somali girl in east London.
>>514829745all north European somehow mutt yeah shut up brownoid
>>514832098Average Saxon admixture <40%, rest is Iron Age Briton or French. Celt Dude approves.>>514834045There is a slightly different signal for LIA Britons. The Bell Beaker admixture seems to blur it (British Beakers derived alot fom Dutch Beakers.) Cousins but not exactly brothers.>>>514834333>Sutton Hoo admixed BritonWhere is this dna sample? Or an ID to look up?>>514839484Post more White Israelislop, its funny. Give us a vertical slice of it.
