why was the SS able to recruit 10,000+ people from a bunch of nations but barely any americans or british? POWs didnt even want to defect
Because it was a gay LARP
Anglo-Saxons are crypto-kikes. The SS was a European force, Anglo-Saxons are no longer European.
>>514839871There were large NatSoc adjacent efforts in both Britain and America.https://youtu.be/blUfm8Mw4rM
>>514839871Why would they defect to the losing side?
>>514839871Cuz if Americans captured you, they killed you.
>>514839964>>514840026> At the close of the Seven Years' War, the army, so renowned for it's disciplined valor, was officered by native Prussians. But it was composed, for the most part, of men from the lowest levels of humanity. Hired, or stolen from almost every nation in Europe. yea germans always relied on not fighting their own wars like cucks
>>514839871Part of it were German minorities, like in Hungary, they got the choice, either enlist in the army of their countries or the Waffen SS as volanteers.If they enlisted with for example the Hungarian army, they were guaranteed to be cannon fodder, while in the Waffen SS they wouldn't necessary be outright sacrificed at the front.As for other nations: partly being convinced by the cause, partly good pay, saved some from being a pow.
>>514840103You wouldn't know, of course. But humans have principles and beliefs in things that are greater than themselves. you? You're just a little shit.
>>514840250what kind of cope response is this sar
>>514840239You're really the pot calling the kettle nigger on that one. I don't even know which example I should pull from Anglo-American history where we didn't use mercenaries or integrate other tribes into our fighting forces.
>>514840239Kekfuel nigger that quote is from Barry Lyndon lmao
>>514840250National Socialism isn't worth dying for.
>>514839871Deracination and no propaganda from the German side got through because they were at war.
>>514839871>Special SauceI know one of the groups was formed specifically to fight the communists - was the SS or another one?
>>514840494>Anglo-Americananglos yes, americans not so much. we didnt have jeet regiments
>>514839871Anglos knew the war was over for germany. All the continentals were recruited early war or had no access to the information that germany was losing. Also many of them simply wanted to fight bolsheviks.
>>514841068Are you kidding nigger? 1/4 Union soldiers in the civil war was an Irish immigrant, most of our military right now is Latino, our navy is like 25% Filipino.
>>514839871Jew brainwashing.Jew lies were the only media the American public consumed. Only recently have Americans had the option to forgo jew brainwashing while staying current and informed. Before the internet you had to be Amish to avoid their lies.Now look at them breakdown do to losing power.
>>514839871why would i want to do work instead of hanging out in a comfy prison camp
>>514840976>I know one of the groups was formed specifically to fight the communists - was the SS or another one?PSA: I was thinking of "Freikorps".
>>514839871Wrong question.>Why didn't the SS trust British and Americans?
>>514841415germans werent good at feeding prisoners, the red cross provided the prisoners like 50% of their food and the germans were cool with it because more food for their troops and civilians
The Americans and the British were on the same level as the Germans, the lesser countries are absorbed by whoever asserts dominance over them, hence NATO and American influence. Basically their power levels were equal or slightly better so they withheld from flipping
>muh liberty>muh exceptionalism
>>514839871You can read the diaries of SS men., They usually say they joined to fight Communism. I read a few of them and they all said that when Finland was invaded by the USSR they realised it was going to invade every European country.
>>514842666>They usually say they joined to fight Communism.sounds like they were just parroting what hitler told them desu
>>514843132That's backwards. Hitler only got to the top because people shared his concerns about communism.
>>514839961This. When they started getting into that kooky Aryan ancient history and magic stuff it was apparent how gay it was.
Many National Socialist movements popped up around Europe.Some of Hitler’s greatest warriors were volunteers
>>514839871Because as soon as American troops saw the condition of German logistics they realized the war was basically over and siding with Germany would not end well for them post-war.
>>514841068Name a war where more than 80% of the soldiers involved on the American side were American citizens.
>>514844440i didnt know we had a foreign legion
>>514844566If you think it's so easy, name one.
>>514843599which is odd for a former Bavarian Soviet member, no?
>>514840593And what is? Tell us what you believe is worth dying for.
>>514839871By the time the SS was in a position to capture Americans, everyone already knew which way the wind was blowing. It would have been colossally fucking retarded to join the SS in 1944, even if you agreed with them. Besides, back then America had the highest standard of living in the world. It actually gave people something to believe in.
>>514840560Just paying homage to the long German tradition of starting retarded wars they can't win. Just like they're doing with Russia now
>>514845374they can only win against smaller countries a quarter of their size
>>514845842Name a war the US has won against a country which was more than a quarter of our size.
>>514846141american revolution, war of 1812. civil war. ww1 and ww2
>>514846230The first three are technically true by certain metrics, but the last two absolutely aren't. It's telling you have to go back that far, also you forgot about the Spanish American war and the Mexican American war, those would also count.
>>514846407>the Spanish American war and the Mexican American warwars against cowardly latinos dont count
1) Outside of downed airmen, the Nazis didn’t capture Americans or Brits in great numbers.2) airmen were officers or officer-adjacent enough to know that joining the SS was pants on head retarded3)those few western allies who were captured post DDay knew goddamn well the war was lost for the Nazis4)Americans enjoyed a far higher standard of living than the Nazis. Different story for English enlisted, but see item 3.Bottom line - Americans weren’t shitty Slavs or scandivs. We were better in every way than euros. Every way. Bigger stronger smarter faster all your women wanted to fuck us. Brit faggots rode our coattails.My grandfather, a paratrooper, came back with so much loot from France and Germany it’s crazy. I have it all in my office and it’s awesome fuck you you euro faggots. I am a former us army officer myself so I too mog all you faggots. Have a hot wife who loves to fuck and two kids and a bunch of your shit in my house as trophies.
>>514846878But wars against ourself or Canadians do? Take the wins you can get, they're the only ones on offer.
>>514846230Add Korea to the list, which was basically against China. We were fighting 1000s of miles away from home while gooks were fighting in their backyard. S Korea is a meaningful player on the world stage and N Korea is a joke.Also we came over and sorted Europe’s nigger-priate problem in North Africa during the Jefferson admin. Euro faggots absolutely mogged.
>>514843132It is quite literally the doctrine of Marx that Communism can’t work unless the whole world is communist
>>514840244>hungarian>german minority
>>514847559Korea's very iffy. China is huge in terms of land mass and population, but their economy definitely wasn't anywhere near a quarter the size of ours at the time. We also only kinda won that one. Between those two factors I'd say it's not a great example.>we came over and sorted Europe’s nigger-priate problem in North Africa during the Jefferson admin.That's even iffier. None of the Barbary pirate kingdoms individually could be counted as being a full quarter the size of the United States at the time by any metric, and they weren't fighting as a unified country. We also didn't really win those wars in a very decisive way, in the first one we only got a peace treaty with the Tripoli pirates, while the rest kept raiding our merchant fleets, and in the second the Barbary pirates already had a lot on their plates since they were increasingly technologically outmatched by the Europeans and didn't want to add America to their list of enemies. My point with asking the question was to point out that the US doesn't have a great track record when it comes to fighting countries that are more than a quarter as powerful as us, so maybe he shouldn't be throwing stones at this nice glass house we're all living in. He already refused to answer when I asked him to give me an example of a war where more than 80% of the soldiers on America's side were American citizens.
>>514839964cope
>>514839871Americans similarly executed many captured SS. No need to join them.
>>514839871>but barely any americans or british?Because they were at war.
>>514848089Austria-Hungary had only been dissolved like 20 years before the war.
>>514850209>Americans similarly executed many captured SSThey didn't. Largest incident was Dachau and only about 50 guys were killed. Most went to trial and went through denazification after the war.
>>514839871Cause protestant christ-cucks
>>514850442couldnt have happened to nicer guys
