[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Charlie Kirk tweets.png (460 KB, 1982x952)
460 KB
460 KB PNG
>inb4 but he's zionist controlled opposition
While I don't disagree, he is objectively a major leading voice for young college aged American men on the right. There's a chance he was just killed by some deranged leftist, but if we get no info about the shooter like with the Vegas shooting then you know it was Mossad

>but why would they kill their best goy?
Look at pic related but also watch this Fox clip of him:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipW5sLfDt6c

If I were the kikes, I'd even go as far as try to frame it on some pro-Palestine leftist and use the outrage to weaponize angry but bluepilled conservative men who might fight for Israel. Maybe even Trump, the goodest goy president might declare war on someone for it. Either further funding for Israel or maybe another shot at Iran. We live in a time of desperate kikes and need to be prepared for the possibility that anything could be a false flag. Kikes will always try to weaponize tragedy to their benefit, especially when they can manufacture the tragedies.
>>
Israel killed him for sure. This was a mossad operation
>>
>>515442127
>>515442415
The attack was way too clean for a random leftist wacko. Professional job.
>>
Netanyahu gloatposted twice
Couldn’t help himself
>>
>>515442127
No shit
>>
Isn't it strange how all the top people of a certain country had a response immediately ready? Even though they normally don't care about goy deaths at all? Stinks of showing up to the funeral for the guy you popped.
>>
>>515443511
Had it even started making the news yet when Bibi posted about it?
>>
you all know by now isreal controls america, and europe, and most of the middle east

mossad and cia are the same

they bomb and assassinate anyone they want and no one can stop them

they killed kirk 100%

the question is why

i can think of many reasons.. 9/11, epstein, girl on train, kirk turning on isreal, gaza genocide distraction, incite civil war.. it was most likely him turning on isreal

after they get usa to bomb iran and force regime change isreal will rule the world

then they will go about killing every non jew

but what if

what if we make everyone aware, and we do a revolution, and put our people in power.. and then .. fuck samson option.. better to die a hero than dieing a coward imo
>>
>>515442127
I had the same thought. Even if he wasn't turning against Israel, he could not defend Israel in a public debate without making it look 100% obvious he's in their pocket. It was making it look way too obvious, he served his purpose for them and any leveraged gain is a plus and worth wasting a pawn. I'm interested in what Nick Fuentes says and does from here.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.