[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Did normies really listen to this guy? To me he just seemed like a meme guy, a dumb dork. He seems insignificant in the scheme of things. What's the benefit of killing him?
>>
>>515569795
To be free from the grooming
>>
>>515569795
He actually did influence the election big way. Way more than Elon Musk for example. Targeting college kids that vote for the first time is the biggest swing factor in swing states. His audience may have been relatively small but effective. Charlie Kirk is unironically one of the reasons why Trump is president. This is literally why Democrats started a campaign to support and push leftwing debate bros like Dean Withers and Parker
>>
>>515569795
I'm sure he had a bigger base of seething trannies and faggots listening to him than his actual "target audience".
>>
>>515569795
Partial agree. I always avoid namefags especially here.
Literally who but I guess he had pull.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.