Anons, some weird fucking shit is going on here. Wtf is this?Am I missing something here? I'm genuinely asking this in all seriousness. I randomly came across what appears to be a schizo type video, I was bored soI clicked on it. I was less than two minutes in, and it shows this very same book being published the day before he was killed. I thought, bullshit. Where's the proof?So I went to archive.md just to see if it could have possibly been archived, and IT WAS.Here's the link to the archive. You can clearly see the publishing date as September 9, 2025. https://archive.is/uwv2JIf you search the title on Google, the top result as of now is this same link, and clicking on it brings you to Amazon, but it's essentially a dead link or I guess it's just been taken down. Picrel is a screenshot of the archived link.GET THE FUCK IN HERE ANONA. WTF IS HAPPENING?Here's a link to the YouTube video.https://youtu.be/asCOqfOdNPoMy second post will be a screenshot of the dead Google link in case that too gets deleted.
>>515603497
>>515603497She just edited the AI booked that she posted on Sep 9
>>515603497Synopsis is ai written
Anons, it appears "The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack, the Aftermath, and America’s Response" was published the day before he died. If there is a logical explanation, I'm all ears. Maybe I'm legit just retarded idk. I feel a bit schizo right now myself.
>>515603497>braindead rightwinger gets confused by webpage indexing, AGAINEvery fucking time anything big happens, this same shit. I wish it was just tech illiterate boomers, but it isn't.
>>515604406Please explain it then. I'm not claiming any of this is true, I'm just looking for answers.
>>515603497https://archive.ph/8sMyWduckduckgo search resultshttps://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466Kwayback machine to bookhttps://archive.ph/bUxiW--------------------https://archive.ph/Ui25f>isbnsearchhttps://archive.is/3xbF5>bookfinderhttps://archive.is/ViBU4>bookscouterISBN & ASIN of other siteshttps://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K>Amazon waybackmachine archive, not mineissue is the publishing date differing. bookscout says the 10th while ISBN Search says the 11th when the original Amazon listing said the 9th.
>>515604728>Please explain it then.The world wide web, (WWW) was invented in 1991 and went live in 1993. You have had 30 fucking years to figure this shit out.
>>515604728You’re arguing with a jew doubt troll. He won’t provide any actual counter argument.
>>515605714Yeah, I honestly don't get the aggression even if this is /pol/. I clearly stated I could be an actual retard regarding this. How is this possible anon?
>>515605176Appreciate it anon.>>515605530Thanks for the help faggot
>>515604228yes you are fucking retarded. the cover is clearly AI slop. you can edit the release date, title, cover, whatever you want to make it look crazy. there are already hundreds of AI generated books on this event on amazon
Regardless of all this, how could you even put a book together in that period of time? You wouldn't have any definitive information and barely anything of note to discuss about the aftermath.
Cover and blurb look ai slop
>>515607605>Regardless of all this, how could you even put a book together in that period of time?it's called premeditation, they plan it out ahead of time. they didnt scribble it all in a day if charlie's death was conspired.
>>515603497The amazon link to the book is dead, the Wayback machine only has archives from today as far as I can see. Can publication dates be doctored by the author/Amazon? very very strange.
>>515607605its called AI copy paste slop you dumb boomer nigger, are you dense?
>>515607976>Cover and blurb look ai slopit went live, the links to it are still available to the site.
>>515608201The amazon link is down, but search engines are showing the webpage with a (2 days ago) beside it. Very very VERY strange. Who is the author?
>>515608503Anastasia J. Casey but that could be a pseudonym
>>515608090This was my thoughts, but it seemed too schizo, which is why I made this thread. Shills are showing me there may be something to this.
>>515603497https://x.com/KatieAciditie/status/1966201838644134140Someone actually purchased this kindle book and share several pages on Twitter.
>>515608201>That's what I'm wondering. It's all very bizarre imo.
>>515609356Thanks anon. That's quite interesting.
>>515607605Only possible if you knew ahead of time and the planned aftereffects were already planned out. So its a copy of the 'official' memo. Realistically impossible. If it were a sincere book, it would take months at the fastest because you would need time to edit, write, research, publishing and track the aftereffects. Even months is honestly pushing it. More like half a year or a year+.
>>515609356>Charlie Kirk's survival, the mobilization of first responders, the unity of the Utah communityHe didn't survive. So the book's conclusion is incorrect. Also, according to someone on Twitter who self-publishes books, the publication date comes from when you click the 'publish' button, then it takes a full 72 hours to review.https://x.com/rattletrap1776/status/1966282076308881741The book reads like AI slop, though.
>>515607237>>515608322Fuck off unless you have something constructive to add to the conversation. Obviously I am not the only one wondering wtf is going on. Go find a bbc thread you fucking faggot.
Just a AI book some retard copy pasted in the hours after the shooting and submitted it. The date can be explained by a mistake by the website. It's one day off not a month.>>515609356Regurgitated info from the wikipedia page.
https://archive.is/uwv2Jhttps://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466KKirk assassination book was published before it happened>INB4 MUH TIMEZONE> Yes, literally only Baker Island and Howland Island—both uninhabited U.S. Minor Outlying Islands in the UTC-12 time zone—were still on September 9th when Charlie Kirk was shot in Utah. All other land areas and countries on Earth had already moved to September 10 or later by that time.Source: perplexitySo, complete and utter bullshithttps://kdp.amazon.com/en_US/help/topic/G200736410#can_update_after_publishing>What you cannot change: The book title, subtitle, or author's name
>>515608322Even if its AI slop there simply isn't enough information at the time of publication, regardless of whether it was published on the 9th or the 10th. What could a book possibly contain about an event that JUST happened? It would be factually incorrect, vague or near immediately irrelevant. It would need constant revisions over a period of weeks, months or years to just accurately detail the event in any meaningful way. It says it was 69 pages long. That isn't very long but its substantial length if you were just going to bullshit something for easy money or ask ChatGPT to generate it based on the wikipedia article.
So in the ending of the book Charlie lives and they use an em dash. So yeah, definitely AI.
>>515611344The book is wrong though and says he survived. In first hours after the shooting there were a few reports he was at the hospital and stable. The ai read that.
>69 pages >AI slopmost of that book must be random facts about utah, no where there's 69 pages of info released yet
>>515603497Looks like a hit contract has been put out. According to a post I read a long time ago, the deep state advertises for assassins as though they were casting for a film e.g. looking for a "producer" or "director" like they did with Scalia. Seems they had the target, just needed someone to perform the hit.
>>515603497>You can clearly see the publishing date as September 9, 2025.and? The publication date is when the book was originally published which Amazon is just gonna accept whatever is entered.Do you think this amazon posting for To Kill a Mockingbird was made in 1988?Some joker cranked out an AI book and put it on Amazon and then entered a date a a couple days before as the publishing date. God you lot are such gullible retards.
>>515611847>Anastasia J. Casey>AJC American Jewish Committee tendered theassassination?
>>515611847Why him of all people? He seemed like such a boring and largely inoffensive character. What were they grooming him to become? Its like he knew he was being groomed to run for office or something or lead a movement but someone thought he was going rogue? Or are we supposed to go with the angle that it was simply a leftist antifa hit?
>>515603497See >>515603948Ai slop merchants aren't going to care about anything but profit and will overwrite their Sonic fanfic to be first with hot new slop.
>>515611711Strange asf.
>>515612409All I know is that he began questioning Israel about Palestine... I think it was about sending a message to the rest of the right-wing media to toe the pro-Israel line or die like Kirk.
>>515607237>>515610285Nothing to say now? >No, you can't actually make it appear on Amazon on the 9th. The listing only goes live once KDP reviews and approves it (usually 24-72 hours after submission). So the earliest it would be visible is still after you hit publish.You can clearly see that the publishing date on the screenshot for Amazon link is September 9, 2025.
>>515615041Thisfaggot UK cuck in another thread spamming that you can change it when you cant
>>515615274So was it pre-planned anon?And for you or any other anons that are interested, Derek Johnson covers the book in a podcast that was recently uploaded.You can skip to 22:48 for that part. The entire podcast sounds interesting. I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this.https://rumble.com/v6yswzw-derek-johnson-911-charlie-kirk.html
>>515616742>preplannedCertainly, very very many indications of this from news articles being up a day early to this strange ass videoThe screenshot may be fake, I've not seen anything about this deleted Kirk tweet but it seems undeniable there is predictive programminghttps://www.tiktok.com/@benzynews2/video/7546347618469809438
>>515617388I had not seen this. Appreciate you anon. It's kinda blowing my mind that more anons are not itt. What's sliding it?
>>515617388And did they change their narrative at the last minute? He initially was supposed to be found in his home?
>>515618902I made a thread ont his earlier but it was slid by faggots saying you can change the date later
