[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sormommek l9ahba.png (2.91 MB, 1024x1536)
2.91 MB
2.91 MB PNG
Text (PDF): https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

Audiobook: https://librivox.org/the-communist-manifesto-by-karl-marx-and-friendrich-engels

also shoutout david graeber:
https://files.libcom.org/files/__Debt__The_First_5_000_Years.pdf
>>
>>516300743
Not a fan of famines and gulags and political repressions and extrajudicial killing though
>>
>>516300743
I read capital and it was retarded
>>
Zoomers cant read
>>
>>
>>516300743
>just read some jewish grifter retard who had no understanding of economics or class structure
No.
>>
>>516301009
and of reading as well i assume?
seems you dont know what the book is about actually
>>
>>516301135
desu if you thought das capital sucks , the manifesto isnt that much smarter , probably dont need to read it if u already know what its about (not commie stereotypes lol)
>>
>>516301144
rip
>>
>>516301409
Name one time that a country modelled on that book didn’t partake in the things I listed
>>
File: 1704646028179275.jpg (126 KB, 1080x1443)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
I've read the communist party manifesto and it was absolutely retarded.
The LTV has been aptly abandoned for 200 years for a reason, it's increasingly palpable how supply & demands affect the markets.
>>
>>516301148
yay newspaper cartoonist's opinion on an ideologies is my favorite way to know about it too!
*sips choky milk like a retard*
>>
>>516301585
The mistake you're making is to believe that only fans has any value
>>
File: PPP.jpg (160 KB, 900x914)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
>>516301148
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOFS0B5gDSc&t=120s
>>
>>516300743
I read books on engineering, not fictional bullshit and schizophrenic theories about why we need a dictatorship with a "people's" prefix attached to it to get rid of the previous ruling council.
>>
>>516301540
learn a new thing retard you should read the book (it aint that big fr) , and make your own opinion im not your mom , even if after you read it you keep insinuating gulags are encouraged by it idgaf , why would i spend time correcting your misconceptions on something you hallucinated and didnt even read bro
>>
>>516301981
>shitty societies founded by Marxist’s aren’t real bro you are hallucinating
K
>>
File: 1692648598157814.png (95 KB, 1002x720)
95 KB
95 KB PNG
>>516301694
>objective value
Imagine being this retarded. You should study to be a knocker-up. Or a lamplighter.
>>
>>516301912
thats awesome! since you read books on engineering im sure you already understand how retarded it would be if i tried to argue against an engineering concept i never red about! and that i should instead educate myself on what other belive before debating their take. great! this reply should be useless then
>>
>>516302110
oh no u misunderstood me , its not the nations that are hallucinations its the notions that you have of communism without reading the book .
like its there black on white .. why not read it
>>
>>516300743
Mein kampf? It’s just 1 book!
>>
File: IMG_6135.jpg (308 KB, 1170x1246)
308 KB
308 KB JPG
>>516301148
>>
>>516300743
Yes, I read the Turner Diaries cover to cover thricely now. Now fuck off.
>>
>>516302183
im not giving up my fat ass salary so you can have a pittance. Sorry anon
>>
>>516301585
Yeah marx underestimated the beast sooooo much its crazy.
hey as long as you've read it man!
>>
>>516302277
Because there’s no point, all the people who read and abide by it go on to either be retards (you) or monsters (every Marxist leader ever)
>>
>>516302285
yeah! a good read
especially if anyone ever wants to speak on the matter of nazism
>>
>>516302401
>the Turner Diaries
not the book i mentionned there bud not even same century lol
>>
>>516302502
Explain Christianity.
>>
>>516302405
dammit
>>
File: 1755442955617602m.jpg (171 KB, 1011x1024)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
>>516302660
>>
>>516300743
just gave it a short read, I mean I knew the basics what is in there but haven't actually read it - and now I still think its retarded
it sounds like its written by someone that sees there are rich people and there are workers but he doesn't identify with the worker class, he just sees them as cogs that will produce output for a OCD style managed state
>>
File: 1691691489601943.gif (1.46 MB, 220x220)
1.46 MB
1.46 MB GIF
>>516300743
lol
lmao even
This is a board for Stormfront rejects, literal neonazi hooligans, whose idea of entertainment and intellectual edification is to screech "nigger" and "kike" at each other all day. Only 1 in 30 /pol/ users has a triple digit IQ. And you expect them to read and understand a book that has more text than pictures. Are you retarded or something? These men are what we call "the executive arm of the street". Disposable cannon fodder. You give them a crate of assault rifles, a target and a short webm cartoon that makes them angry and then explains to them why the target made them angry. You don't give them books, dumbass. What are they supposed to do with books?
>>
>>516302587
euh a religion , prophet and deliverer of the message is jesus christ , no idolatry , sacrifice yourself for god and society, dont make covenant as hard for gentiles, etc..
i mean its christianity doubt i can explain in one message why?
>>
>>516300743
I have faggot, and in the end that homeless cocksucker admits he just wants everybody to die, including the pros. Get fucked
>>
>>516302898
oh no u misunderstood me , its not the spiritual that are hallucinations its the notions that you have of Christianity without reading the book.
>like its there black on white .. why not read it
>>
>>516303024
I read the bible many times man what are u on about :v also the other montheistic scriptures
>like its there black on white .. why not read it
like i said i did , jesus ? goated , he could have fucked the romans up , but chose to be based
>>
>>516300743
kill yourself
>>
>>516303121
sir yessir
>>
>>516303024
also i used to be the most argumentative cringydebateloving shitty atheist until i actualy red the fucking religious books i was insulting all day, (and realised its not the scriptures fault that the theists defneding them all this time were just low iq) and this is why im making this thread dingus
>>
>>516302851
well i mean you should actually read it then no ? lol

afterwards you can think marx was autistic , non friendlt , or bourgeois himself thats your perogative
>>
>>516302409
Your religion of envy leads to millions dead, millions starving and a worse life for everyone you claim to try to be helping.
You have no qualms about any of those consequences and imposing them on people that want nothing to do with it, because you're an arrogant retard, and should your wishes ever come to fruition, you'd be the one thrown in the gulags first, since thankfully commies are the best commie killers around.
>>
>>516300743
tldr
can tiktok instead?
>>
>>516303487
(religion? whatevs i know wat ur saying)

hey i can only hope you are wrong in general.
but if people want nothing to do with it it shouldnt be forced on them im sure we agree on that
>>
>>516303530
tss no can do gotta suffer
>>
File: 1757684920826729.gif (530 KB, 800x450)
530 KB
530 KB GIF
>>516300743
>Just read the goddamn fucking book , its just one book and then at least ull know
lol, no, stupid
>>
>>516301009
>famines and gulags
tell caesar to stop fucking with nature, and you wont have to suffer famines and gulags
>>
>>516303915
>>
>>516303464
he's just like me, fr fr.
makes me hate him even more, desu, senpai, on bog.
>>
>>516303647
>but if people want nothing to do with it it shouldnt be forced on them im sure we agree on that
If you want to fuck off and start a voluntary commune in an uninhabited small plot of land I'd have no problem with that, I just don't want any whiff of your religion being imposed on an inhabited nation anywhere.
>>
>>516300743
Why would i read a book by someone who never worked?
>>
>>516300743
Is this translation decent?
>>
File: 1743791842798086.png (57 KB, 240x240)
57 KB
57 KB PNG
>>516303996
sorry fellow tard fren, but i wont eat the commie slop, i will not live in the commie slop, i will not submit to commie prods.

i will parasite off the capitalist
i will neet off the goy slaves
they want their shiny garbage, so i'll neet until they're in their graves.
>>
>>516304160
Because he put labour into the book, it’s not effective, efficient or valuable labour but you have to purchase it anyway
>>
>>516304131
I wouldnt want that either
marx wouldnt want that either
lenin wouldnt want that either

stalin definetly would be okay with it lol
>>
>>516304160
its free , also to learn stuff for when you need to talk with someone about the topic
Text (PDF): https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

Audiobook: https://librivox.org/the-communist-manifesto-by-karl-marx-and-friendrich-engels
>>
>>516300743
>"It's... not ok to make your dumbness other people's issue"
>advocates communism
bruh
>>
>>516304168
honestly not sure ; i think it is ; apologize if it is not
>>
>>516304497
heh just read the book man
>>
>>516304380
Pretty much everything Stalin did was mentioned as acceptable in Lenin’s letters tho, forced collectivisation, gulag slaves, extrajudicial killing, show trials, terror as a policy, all a okay according to Lenin
>>
>>516304562
I have read the book and was thoroughly unimpressed. You are operating under the wildly false assumption that your opponents:
>simply haven't read your foundational text
>upon reading said text, would necessarily agree with it
As many others have pointed out, the labor theory of value has been affirmatively empirically disproven. Historical materialism is, at best, propganda or a false religion.
>>
>>516304562
Hey bro, I read it and I also studied it a lot.

I don't agree with a single point in the book, ama. Or should I start asking you questions?
>>
>>516300743
>>
File: 1623936277006.jpg (601 KB, 2048x1775)
601 KB
601 KB JPG
>>516304562
>just drink the poison man
>how do you know it will make you shit your pants and die? you've never had any
Dude, this ideology killed hundreds of millions. I don't need to read it to know it's retarded.

Rhetoric can sound incredibly logical and at the same time appeal to our greatest desires and fears. But that's just our ape brains. The true test is the empirical test. The real world.

And when that book was applied to the real world, the biggest genocides in history took place.
>>
File: 1420753763001.jpg (119 KB, 700x536)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>516301009
>>
File: file.png (66 KB, 751x425)
66 KB
66 KB PNG
>>516304380
>marx wouldnt want that either
The book you just linked says otherwise. It says Marx literally wants to steal my things, as they exist now, and make it the state's property.
I shouldn't be surprised you lied, since all commies are snakes.
>>
>>516304711
oh mm a looot of people didnt read it ,
im assuming now that you specifically did, which is great! and if we were to ever meet that would be great! cause we could directly actually talk about it and your quarels with it etc..
but yeah this thread is mainly here to encourage people to read it first ,
the same way i should understand at least the basics of free markets and their advantages before i insult them.
If you care to share why the labor theory of value is empirically disproven feel free to do so man
>>
>>516302392
That's hilarious! saved
>>
>>516300743
Read it as a kid. Totally retarded. Tankies are the dumbest people on Earth.
>>
>>516300743
i read it as a teen and found it to be low iq trash
>>
>>516304993
seems you havent read the book , and insist on speaking on something you havent read , you should read it and then speak about it.
>>
>>516305024
That was a chill and respectful response. Good for you man. I can't stick around for more conversation, but I wish you the best. People who are willing to have a conversation are rare in this world anymore, and it gives me just a little bit more hope for the future.
>>
File: 1756273478814101.jpg (241 KB, 1800x1544)
241 KB
241 KB JPG
>>516305024
>If you care to share why the labor theory of value is empirically disproven feel free to do so man

It's wrong because the whole theory is built around the concept of surplus value, while completely disregarding the "deficit value" concept.

I'll give you an example. Suppose that a "capitalist" has inherited a piece of land that he now sells for 100k and wishes to try his luck and test his skill in business. He uses that 100k to organize capital as well as labor. He begins the manufacturing process and .... he fails. It's a complete disaster, due to his lack of experience or any other hundred reasons why a business could fail (majority of businesses do fail).

So now, the "capitalist" is no longer a capitalist, he has nothing. While the worker is in fact a salaried man. Worker was paid for his work without the value produced. He STOLE the money from the capitalist for his work was not verified on the market.

This is equally ridiculous as the whole marxist theory of economics, but it would make perfect sense in that theoretical framework. Of course, this example could easily be explained with normal (capitalist) economics, where market is just a sum of the competition forces along with luck and social reality.
>>
>Thinks I'm going to waste my time digesting kike propaganda specially designed for the goyim.

>It's okay to be dumb but not make your dumbness other people's issues.

OP is a special kind of dumb
>>
>>516305021
>It says Marx literally wants to steal my things
the word 'steal' is nowhere in the text , you must not know what 'literally' means ...

okay so the paragraph u posted, hes talking about how we take the private branches/means of production (not your private property like your underwear or car , we dont need those they are usuless to us as a society) and own them communely , so you for example who is afraid of people "stealing your things" like you said (feels like talking to a cartoon 5 year old) don't have to fear anything from this paragraph , but also you get to communly decide in what your society produces yay!
>>
>>516305228
you have a good one man
>>
>>516300743
is never okay to be a jew
>>
>>516305524
He literally says “private property must therefore be abolished”
Did you even read it bro fr fr it’s not long
>>
>>516303464
>well i mean you should actually read it then no ? lol
are you also retarded? can you read? I just wrote i read it
>only works if he wants to (and probably only what he wants to, write stuff down is his work)
I dont think he sees himself like a worker in a factory that can't just decide yeah no I make these pieces in a couple of days...
that's why its not working
>>
>>516305524
A community is not wiser than the market of unconscious forces, as has been demonstrated countless times.

"Theft" is never explicitly mentioned, but always implied. What do you think "redistribution of resources" means? Redistribution = theft

It's as I were to invent a world swiftheading (to swiftly behead someone) without saying that we should execute someone. "See, we're not talking about killing anyone, just about swiftheading them".
>>
>>516305464
hmm
>So now, the "capitalist" is no longer a capitalist, he has nothing.
after the capitalist failed , he became a worker , not nothing ; if the rules of society are fair for workers , if a businessman fails they still live a respectful dignified life.

>While the worker is in fact a salaried man.
if the business failed the worker also lost his job, and will find a new job , he is also affected altho he made no decisions and would not have share in the spoils in case of success

>He STOLE the money from the capitalist for his work
what?
>>
>>516305524
have you even read it?
> (not your private property like your underwear or car , we dont need those they are usuless to us as a society)
>car
it even says
>Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the
State.
>>
>>516305697
yes and it must be replaced by " the common utilization of all instruments of production and
the distribution of all products according to common agreement "

that dosnt sound good to you?


you dont like the common utilization of instruments of production? (so that people can produce without needing to beg the overlord inheritooor to produce for them)

or you dont like the distribution of all products according to common agreement ??

you prefer it when its distributed without agreement? whoever gets it (no matter how he gets it) keeps it, like savages ?
>>
>>516305794
Maybe you should go and actually study that theory and not just spend your time on Reddit.

The example I gave you is very precise and your response to it completely shows the flaws of the whole theory. If you knew anything about it, you would know understand what you just did.

1) Capitalist cannot become a worker, for capital is always multiplying itself. In marxists theory, it's impossible for a capitalist to fail. All capital engagement is profitable, because workers ALWAYS produce value, not matter how good they work.

Which is nonsense, thus the example I gave.

2) But how can the worker receive a salary if his work was not confirmed on the market? He cannot receive salary if he did not produce any value? How is this possible? It shouldn't me in marxist theory.

Which is nonsense, thus the example I gave.


3) The worker exploited the capitalist for the worker tricked the capitalist into paying him what he was not worth, because the market did not value the work of the worker.
>>
>>516306063
Are you above 100IQ and older than 12?

Do you believe everything you read and assume that things are true and will work just as you've read and imagined them? Are you aware that people lie?

Are you even aware what "political-economy" means? POLITICAL. POLITICAL. THINK ABOUT THAT? What does POLITICAL MEAN?

Political means the control of the masses, thus political economy is based around creating a thinking framework about how economy works that can be used to MOTIVATE THE IGNORANT MASSES.
>>
>>516305915
euh yes i did ,
so the screenshot is talking about the means of production , and how they should be available to all (aka DEcentralised)

"Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the"
is another part,
>>
>>516306063
Oh so now it does say it’s taking private property from people, but that’s actually a good thing? You argue like you wear a tiny hat
What about the common agreement part? I don’t agree that you should get what I produce so that you can write slam poetry in seattle while moderating r/itwillworkthistime, does that mean I go to gulag? Or would my disagreement be accepted?
>>
instead of reading that shity book that over elaborates over points into something that can be described in a few paragraphs i decided to look up criticisms of the book instead
the critics seem heck'n valid, sorry pal
>>
>>516306269
>so the screenshot is talking about the means of production , and how they should be available to all (aka DEcentralised)
kek are you that stupid you can read a document about centralization and think somehow a magical dream decentralized structure comes out of it? one that no one talks about except in their mental gymnastics?
>"Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the"
next sentence we are at centralization again - and you just skip the whole part of having your own means of transportation
>>
>>516306328
>You argue like you wear a tiny hat
first time i ever heard this and its great lol

what he is talking about in that paragraph is private property in the means of production so privately owning a factory , privately owning a filming studio privately owning a thing that allows us humans/society to produce things in an industry
(so not your son's bike or your socks)

>What about the common agreement part?
common.agreement
if we dont agree , and then i kill you thats obviously not a common agreement lol


>I don’t agree that you should get what I produce so that you can write slam poetry in seattle..
obviously i wouldnt agree to this either ,
i do personally think that its normal for a select few members of society to do art, dont you?
>>
>>516300743
reading is boring. iracing my bmw gt4 against others is a bit more fun.
>>
>>516306730
No it says clear that since private property cannot be separated from competition and individual management of industry so it must be abolished
Read it again
Also can a bike or socks be produced and sold for value? Then it’s a “good” that will fall under the communal ownership of goods right?
You are dialectically tying yourself into a pretzel mate, it’s right there in plain writing but you think it says something completely different
>>
>>516301409
The communist manifesto literally tells people to commit violence.
>>
>>516301148
socialism sounds great but what if you only have one cow?
>>
>>516307114
>my bmw gt4
No it’s all of ours comrade, let me have a spin
>>
>>>516300743
I now denounce Yehovah. Selah.

> I now cannibalize Yehovah. Amen.
>>
>>516301981
>why would i spend time correcting you?
because you want the person to learn what you want him to? what a stupid wuestion.
>>
>>516300743
I read that already and it's just utopian opium ramblings
try these, they have interesting comparisons to be drawn with the real state and you can tell whether someone is familiar with both the reality and the document by the way they respond to each
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifesto_of_the_Fascist_Intellectuals
sjsu.edu/faculty/wooda/2B-HUM/Readings/The-Doctrine-of-Fascism.pdf
>>
>>516307191
come round blud and you can have a drive
>>
itt: bots
>>
File: spede.jpg (8 KB, 246x278)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>516300743
Why should I read it when I can read history to see what communists actually did when they got into power
>>
>>516300743
no
>>
>>516307145
I think we are misunderstanding each other here , and i fear I dont have a clear sentence to give.

I believe the screenshotted paragraph talks about the means of production .
a bike/sock can be produced ofc , what we want to collectivise is what produces them , and not the objects themselves.
I personally do not want your things and im trying to communicate that no communist wants your things just the means of productions so we can decide together (not sharholders) of what to produce


(do u know the distinction between private and personal property ?)
>>
>>516300743
why?
seriously, no serious communist revolutionary in this age gives a shit about whatever marx wrote about
they stopped caring when ww1 proved him wrong about capitalism
italian fascism has more in common with orthodox marxism than either do to the progressive current of today
>>
>>516307684
>I personally do not want your things and im trying to communicate that no communist wants your things
Exept every time in history when communism was implemented they did want peoples things and murdered them to get them
>>
>>516307290
you are right 100% to be honest,
but its very hard to argue/debate (not teach) with people from 0 without them not having the basics of the subject ,
>>
>>516307832
bruh
read the book , ask more communists , get out of your own head
>>
>>516307863
its true but you’re going to have to work hard to see the change you want. personally i just want whatever allows me to sit indoors gaming for 10 hours a day while i take breaks to walk the dog,feed the cat, and water my sarrcenia.
>>
File: 1679572605979480.jpg (209 KB, 1290x1948)
209 KB
209 KB JPG
>it's okay to be dumb, goy
>>
>>516308033
godspeed man sounds lovely
>>
File: 1757654868537005.gif (1.81 MB, 640x640)
1.81 MB
1.81 MB GIF
>>516301148
>buy a bull
>>
>>516308011
Checked, communists always lie and theory that Marx puts out is not only retarded but delusional, so we can only look at what communists actually did when they took power and thats almost without exeption mass murders and mass theft of private property, mass incarceration and so on
>>
File: GhCMvHJXcAApwR5.jpg (97 KB, 944x458)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>516308094
Its more than okay is what nixon said
>>
>>516308145
checked? cool
>>
>>516307684
Oh thank you so much for letting me keep socks mate, what about my house, my land, my tractor, the grain I produce? Sounds like you do want my stuff
>>
>>516308033
kek you can only do that in current society and not in one that everyone has their share of the means of production. because that means you actually have to do stuff
>>
>>516308237
Newfag
>>
>>516308175
whats wrong with having an abundance in highly educated people? also is that the roger freeman of British descent? he went to oxford uni so was probably some masonic cunt.
>>
File: 1756828006097681.png (1.09 MB, 1152x896)
1.09 MB
1.09 MB PNG
>>516307863
>>516308011
>>516308101
>>516308175
So you came here to talk about the book, and will just ignore my posts?
>>
>>516308274
>you have to do stuff
meh, ill run away and find a bunker somewhere, rig up an extension cable and game to my hearts content. i doubt there will be people looking for random folks.
>>
>>516308455
That’s why they make internal passports and the checka/kgb and also make it a crime for anyone who knows and doesn’t report you
>>
>>516308257
you're welcome, it would be retarded to give you a product made from the means of production we have and then ask you to share it as if we couldnt make more now that we have the means of prod. only a retard would even think we would take ur socks right? a retard that never read the book and that should read the book so he stops being so embarassing right?


house ? personal property

tractor / grain ? not personal property yes sorry


if your neighbor dosnt have grain, the tractor and other farming tools ofc should be used to provide for him , or for you and your kids if you were in his shoes , and he was hoarding the means of prod.

If you monopolise grains or anything of the sort maybe like 'Monsanto' currently you do deserve death sorry to say.

because we live in a society and need to act like it.
>>
>>516308455
too bad that's a crime, I think you need some reeducation
>>
>>516308411
i came here to get people to read the book if they have the time and they want to.
saw your replies didnt want to answer further , you should paste them into chatgpt or smthng maybe
>>
>>516308559
i have literally no friends left so there will be nobody to miss me. ive thought about every conceivable angle except for burying the extension cord. well, i have now. kek
>>516308928
catch me if you can, commie… lol
>>
>>516308922
Why should I make grain if you are going to take it and make me eat two minute noodles? It’s not like you worked to earn enough to buy the land, the equipment, fertiliser, water, you want a cut of the product you can front some capital
>>
>>516309276
>why would i produce grain
so you can eat?
>>
>>516309354
So I’ll make enough just for me and mine and you can starve
>>
>>516309075
But wait, that doesn't make sense. You are are speaking with other people here and replying to their questions.

And second, what's the point of reading the book and asking others to read it if you yourself don't understand it or can't read it? If YOU read the book, then I assume you're aware of what's in it and based on your flags and postings you agree with it. So it should be a simple to thing to answer my posts.

Unless, you're just doing this for propaganda.
>>
>>516309276
so yeah mm one very important thing is that
marx built a system he didnt just shoot a single idea;

If you buy the land, the equipment, fertiliser, water and do everything yourself of course society has no right to your labor bro .

but why let you struggle on your won like an animal which then give you an exuse to keep everything for yourself like a savage?

why not cooperate in a society , together from each according to his ability to each according to his needs.
so that production is easy + cooperative
and the rewards are shared .

do you long for misery?
>>
File: 1758092885148.jpg (104 KB, 698x1000)
104 KB
104 KB JPG
>>516300743
Why don't you tell us your favorite quotes from this book you've totally read?
>>
>>516309593
Are you really this pathetic?
>>
>>516309685
beebee booboo
we live in society
>>
>>516309464
so the main reason is that i have nothing to say that will advance the convo with u bud, or that would be useful to you.

our 2 starting points are too far away and i dont have the mind to meet you where u are
>>
File: MarxDad.png (715 KB, 1814x628)
715 KB
715 KB PNG
>>516301488
>(not commie stereotypes lol)
lol
Marx himself was the proto-commie stereotype.
>>
>>516309593
>If you buy the land, the equipment, fertiliser, water and do everything yourself of course society has no right to your labor bro .
I asked the peasants in Tambov (and about 360 other places) in 1920 and they said that’s bullshit and you are stealing their grain at gunpoint so they are rebelling
> why not cooperate in a society
Why cooperate with people who are trying to rob me of my labour?
> so that production is easy + cooperative and the rewards are shared .
Why should the reward be shared if the input of capital (which is the result of labour) is not shared?
>>
>>516309866
lol first time i see this thanks for sharing
>>
>>516309593
>>516310101
All your arguments are boiling down too:
>come on bro just give me your stuff bro, you can keep your socks
Which makes sense since Marx spent his whole life begging Engels to pay for everything
>>
>>516310186
okay , mm im pretty sure that not what i said ; but thats what you heard and thats okay.

read the book then, obviously better and more eloquent arguments there;
>>
>>516310441
Even if I read it you would tell me that it actually means something different like with excerpt earlier in the thread
But thank you for proving that people who agree with the book are retarded
>>
Thessalonians 2:15
They have killed OUR Lord Jesus Christ and their prophets. They work against God and are the enemies of all MANKIND
>>
>>516310878
unless im inside your head 24/7 i cant do that and ull be able to have your own opinion like a big boi yay
>>
>>516300743
OP's pic is a grave insult to the DNC.
>>
>>516300743
marx talks about bourgeoisie like hitler talks about jews. are the bourgeoisie jews?
>>
>>516309856
Intellectual coward.
>>
>>516300743
>hegelian dialectic reframed as class struggle
you're peddling outdated and retarded philosophical drivel
>>
>>516300743
are the proletariat gentiles?
>>
>>516309593
Sorry, but I'd rather work for myself and only produce enough food for myself and my family then produce an abundance of food that I then have to give to the leeches.
>>
>>516300743
The 20th century just called, and they want their political struggle back.
>>
>>516300743
Engels had nothing to do with the CM. Marx hired him to be his cover goy so everyone wouldn't immediately call it jew slop, which it is.
t. also read Das Kapital

If you want to know what socialism was before kikes subverted it, read Eugen Dühring's The Jewish Question as a Racial, Moral, and Cultural Question; 1981.
>>
>>516313536
>1981
1881*



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.