[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9292.png (112 KB, 1132x1155)
112 KB
112 KB PNG
Hey Jimmy Kimcel's
>>
>>516640331
Too long, didn't read
>>
File: 1758348777190.png (354 KB, 894x878)
354 KB
354 KB PNG
>>
File: IMG_9293.png (151 KB, 785x1000)
151 KB
151 KB PNG
>>516640389
tl;dr
>>
>>516640331

You know you can contact the FCC and make a complaint about what Kimmel said
>>
File: jones money.jpg (575 KB, 1090x810)
575 KB
575 KB JPG
>>
1. When public speech is monopolized under a few online platforms which act as de facto public spaces, censorship of these platforms should be treated as a violation of the 1st amendment, regardless of whether they are privately owned
2. If the government is coercing or threatening a private company into censorship, that is a clear violation of the 1st amendment
>>
File: IMG_9202.jpg (162 KB, 720x960)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
>>516641362
So if I had to watch Kimmel can I get a $100,000,000 settlement?
>>
>>516640860
Why not post the full thing?
>For purposes of this rule, “public harm” must begin immediately, and cause direct and actual damage to property or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their duties.
>>
File: 1751339862619569.png (92 KB, 293x281)
92 KB
92 KB PNG
>>516640331
Cancel culture is heckin great when our side does it!
>>
>>516642050
Yes.
>>
>>516640331
>man this Kimmel guy is costing us a shitload of money and has shit ratings but we can't cut him loose
>hold my beer
>>
>>516642050
there's nothing wrong with cancelling enemy propaganda
>>
File: 1566829731110.jpg (17 KB, 540x304)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>516641838
No , it does not work that way ,

Alex Jones was sued and the plaintiffs won because he cause emotional distress for spread a Hoax / "fake news" -- ene though he was an "entertainer" like Kimmel.

Kimmel violate FCC rules
>>516640860

Not only would ABC have to pay the fine ( after the investigation ) -- it's finding would be a speed run for the Kirk family to get a huge payout
>>Oh and what standards do we have set -- $1.5 billion .....

And since they would have the FCC violation already in hand, ABC has no defence , all the court has to do if find the amount they feel would be appropriate.
>>
>>516642033
>Why not post the full thing?

Too wordy -- ie TL;dr

oh and that part can be interpreted many ways, not by a court , but by a board from the FCC .
>>
>>516642050
Didn't they fucking do it anyway?
>>
>>516640331
more like Jimmy chemtrails the disgusting fat fuck
>>
>>516642370
Protip:
If you keep switching sides, you will be always on the right side.
It is what Jews do.
>>
File: 1758269688454037.jpg (221 KB, 1150x1173)
221 KB
221 KB JPG
>>516640331
>>
>>516640331
If this is true, then only the rich and powerful have free speech. The rest are cattle.
Do Americans not realize this?
>>



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.