Shot comes from behind and to the right of Charlie.https://x.com/2Smartski/status/1969453063032176677https://x.com/2Smartski/status/1969453063032176677https://x.com/2Smartski/status/1969453063032176677
>simply doesn't match the audio>google the speed of sound>google the distance between the shooter and KirkOh..
>>516709793No it doesn't in this slo-mo video you can clearly watch the shockwave of the impact travel from front to back im all for a good conspiracy theory but this one is absolutely retarded.
>>516710160You're a disgusting, shit eating jew.Absolutely no one is buying the idea a 30-06 hit him in the front and didn't paint that fucking tarp. He was shot from behind. The actual projectile was caught in flight and you DUG UP THE GRASS to recover it.Get fucked. His chain flies off like that because the bullet came out and hit it, so it went flying into his shirt. There's no exit wound to explain that from the back.
It was staged.It was fake.It was THEATRE!Kirk was a character on the fakest and gayest show on earth: Politics.Here we see the stage after the “shooting”, notice the minuscule amount of ‘blood’ on the podium, notice the complete absence of blood on the grass, notice the complete absence of any blood trail, highly inconsistent with a jugular wound, highly consistent with a squib and blood pack. This video, despite being entirely PG has been getting scrubbed from social media. Why? Because it proves definitively that this was THEATRE.>t-the blood all fell on his shirt!A jugular wound bleeds PRODIGIOUSLY, a thin shirt that can’t even hide his protruding nipples (disgusting) can’t soak up pints of blood (and would leave a blood trail anyway). This video confirms what the front videos imply: blood pack volume of blood.>b-but muh conspiracyIf we reject the official narrative (as we must given that a .30-06 would destroy a neck), we MUST accept the staged hypothesis, as this is the simplest explanation that matches the data.Fake and gay like Butler PA
>https://files.catbox.moe/ld82su.mp4only footage, nothing more for us goyim >https://files.catbox.moe/m757w0.mp4>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y10B2GUMiD018:58 right before the sound
>>516710160Air squib. Shirt billows from the air squib.
>>516710160>this one is absolutely retardedBut anon!He's got circlesIN DIFFERENT COLORSSorry, it's open and shut
>>516710396This. It's already been debunked by world class American Snipers on youtube. They said it was ridiculous. Everyone that hunts knows it is. Except the street shitters at the FBI that have never fired a gun.
>>516710510It's his fucking chain. It's hit by the exiting bullet. Kirk is dead.
>>516710396Im not saying it was the alleged sniper im saying it didn't come from behind to further my point this is what it looks like when someone gets hit in slow-mo notice the shockwave of the impact travels from the right side of the face to the left
>>516710968He wasn't hit by anything from the front. The chain flips around his shirt backward because the bullet snapped and stretched it going out. That's actually the only explanation for it. A bullet going in, the chain just would have broken and done nothing.
>get here early>let the shills eat dead airobserve the retards at work
>>516710711Air squib. Cry moar shill.Kirk is a character, the actor is fine.
>>516711430Denounce the halakha, the rabbinical talmud, and Benjamin Netanyahu.
Copied from other bread, I posted just before it closed>Pro audio engineer here with ~25 years of film/video experience.> Doing forensic analysis where your source material is a mix of shitty streaming codecs derived from who-knows-what original codec on unknown hardware is an absolute waste of time.>Example: this is video from a guy who was recording the whole event for some student journalism project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y10B2GUMiD0 >Around the 11-12 minute mark he's chatting with 3 students and some other people off camera, and mentions he's using a micro 4/3 camera. a semi pro setup. Notice how the audio is (with the students) is several frames off from the video. that's after only 12 minutes of shooting, and errors like that are cumulative.>Why? Because popular frame rates for video are 24fps (if you want film look) or 30fps (for smooth action). But in reality the rates are 23.98 fps and 29.97 fps, due to historical engineering reasons - electricity runs at 60hz in the US and this created an interference problem in the early days of broadcast TV, so the frame rate was offset slightly to compensate. This is called drop frame encoding (because you skip a frame periodically). it's a pain in the ass to conform audio and video if they're not configured correctly.Fast forward to streaming video, and a lot of codecs have problems with sync drift because most software engineers neither know nor care about this, and many of them are not even in the US so they don't have to think about it. If you are not manufacturing specifically for the pro market, why would you care? Even if you are manufacturing for the pro market, if things are not set up correctly it's the editor's problem to fix.>Bottom line is that video and audio are separate streams at the software level and you cannot rely on them to be synced correctly OR consistently. Sync will get worse depending on how long the camera has been running. Sorry. I will stick around to answer questions.
>>516710396Fuck off leftist
>>516709793No dudes. Charlie was not shot. Exploding electronic device like the pagers. Look. https://x.com/CurrieWindsor/status/1969537275609403734
>>516711106Point out the chain for me in this HD photo
>>516711106Or this one
>>516711666your trips expose you. Sync with video don't matter. He is just using the audio.
>>516712386Wow. This might be it.
>>516712386Not sold, but this is one of the plausible theories. I wondered about the magnetic clasp on his shirt from the outset (because I didn't know what it was) and I just couldn't see how a bullet would cause his shirt to billow up in that peculiar way.I think he is wrong about the magnetic clas being the projectile, that would be wildly unreliable and unpredictable. But if there was a shaped charge in the battery (which is totally possible) then there could be a small projectile in that, or the charge itself might be sufficient. On the other hand, this would require someone to either fit the audio on him to be sure it worked the right right, or for Kirk to be trained to fit it a particular way, neither of which seem like a very sure thing. All of these alternative theories require Tyler Robinson tobe part of a psyop, which will be an uphill struggle to prove.If it is true then the medical exam would reveal ballistic and perhaps chemical information, assuming it hasn't been tampered with. Yet again I wonder why the hell it takes 4-6 weeks to generate an ME report since the autopsy was clearly performed within 48 hours of his death and his body returned to the family.
>>51671166615 years here.. that's some chat gpt shit right there. Audio guys know, ur dealing with the tip of the 'tism.
>>516709793Mossad thought they could beat the combined power of all the internet's autists?
>>516712386movement starts on the back of the neck.
>>516714477A video shows the projectile come in from the back confirming.
Motive: stop the next JFK before he’s the president
>>516712786Under his shirt which is riding high on his neck>>516712851Are you retarded? you can literally see the necklace on the right side of his neck, plain as day.You can see his chain when you crank the brightness/contrast on all the pics. Too lazy to upload the pic you've all seen many times here
You don’t turn down hundreds of millions of dollars
>>516713071That might be true, but in OPs screenshot it talks about 7 mic locations, my post is only to explain why doing any kind of triangulation on that basis is a dead end because you don't have reliable sync.I have no opinion on the crack-bang analysis in the spectrogram because I am not a gun guy, it sounds reasonable. However I would be hesitant about plotting the camera locations because we don't know what focal length any of the cameras have. I looked at his X posts but didn't see that information mentioned anywhere. I don't know whree that screenshot is from as it seems to be a different X thread from the one OP posted. Anyway I am not disagreeing with you about this part, as I said I am not a gun guy.>>516714037I am not sure what you mean but I never use chatGPT or any other AI to generate text, strictly as a research tool. For people who want an external source on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMPTE_timecode is reasonably accurate and includes a link to the official SMPTE standard in footnote 3 (but you have to pay for it).I mentioned software engineers because I used to beta test for Adobe on Audition/Premiere and getting their software engineers to understand and care about this was extremely frustrating. they would keep saying 'but why can't you just configure corrrectly inthe first place' and I had to keep explaining taht the audio editor and the on-set sound engineer are not usually the same person, you often get handed video material with no idea of who shot it or how it was set up, and even if you are doing both jobs and trying to be careful about it you can mess up the camera or audio recording settings every time you have battery or media change.
>>516712386Something looks off about this video. Is it altered? Is there another that can confirm the same effect?
>>516710160the webm that btfo all >it's came from teh back shills
>>516715337This video literally shows the bulge start in the back, then ricochet off the spine out the front.
>>516714477This is correct
>>516714477>>516715426Though I will say, from that point of view, the first movement we see would be from the back of the neck if the bullet hit him in the ear or around the ear enough to propel his earpiece and its cord. If the bullet hit his earpiece it would have launched the cord first thing off of his back right where we see the movement. This continues to the front as well, lifting his shirt. It seems to me the best theory is that the bullet entered in or around his right ear and came out his neck.
>>516709793What is this retarded fairy cartoon character you've slapped on to the image? Are 12? Get that shit off it you want anyone to take this serious. Youre already a schizo which is a stirke against anyone caring and now it's childish and autistic
>>516715572That’s believable. Either the other side of the head or in the back and bouncing around then out the front.
>>516710396You have no idea how gunshot wounds work. Nitwit
>>516714477Thats the round exiting. Do you not understand how bullets work?
>>516715648It's game, anonThey're trying to find out how retarded can they make their OP and still bait the conspiratards into believing it and getting the thread to bump limit
Who is this god damn chinese jew OP retard shill moron motherfucker here? Do you dumb jeet skeet jizz gargling faggots actually think anyone is going to listen to your fucking bullshit water muddying propaganda riddled narrative? Are you just posting it here to make 4chan users look like fucking conspiracy theorist morons? Everyone saw the fucking tape you desperate fucking kike muslim arab jeet moron. Tell your handlers it isn't working then go kill yourself. Fucking idiot.
>>516715426>>516715337Video is edited you dumb fucked look at the placement of people it was a mockup by feds day 2 when we started investigating and you kikes are still using itNo other video but this fake one shows this.I've got 13 angles of this same side and this isn't in them and the man in the white hats further up you absolute kikes.
>>516715682Sorry was responding to others but that first video is a mock job, check the people placement versus others it's wrong still came from behind but that's false shit
>>516716091can you post them
>>516715870I guess the gel doesn't either. Maybe you can draw a diagram of how it works.
Anyone notice that the weird front row sunglass guy, who messes with the arm of his shirt, goes and helps Kirk's team carry him to the car then goes to the driver side of the SUV like he's the driver? I can't find the WEBM anymore. Can someone post it for me?
>>516710160Its probably being pushed to make the Mossad groomed the shooter angle look silly.
>>516710160Novel micro Jet Injector explosive taped to him in the guise of a normal communication device.Operation Grim Beeper 3.0
>>516712386A device taped to the back of his neck.Utilizing a shaped charge technology with a Jet Injector.The only “projectile” was high pressure gas.
>>516709793Literally dpesn't. Mainstream story is bullshit. Shot still came from Charlie's upper left.
>>516714477There was a device taped to the back of his neck. A normal comms device. Like an inductive headphone device.He thought it was normal.But it was rigged. Inside, it had the components of a high velocity Jet Injector. It exploded, and left a pinhole in the back of Charlie’s neck, but it was engineered to flare out: rupturing important veins in his neck and ripping a hole in the front of his neck to ensure quick drainage of blood.This was intended to be a demonstration of technical assassination capability. No idea of this was done by Russia, China, or Israel.
>>516714477Look at the video of him from -front. Watch it in slow motion. A few tufts of his hair rise up over his right ear before the chain (or a wire) explodes to the right side of his head and the exit wound appears on his neck.
>>516715198>That might be true, but in OPs screenshot it talks about 7 mic locations, my post is only to explain why doing any kind of triangulation on that basis is a dead end because you don't have reliable sync.You don't need a sync between cameras to do this analysis. The analysis uses the time difference between the sound of the gunshot and the sound of the impact to calculate the distance the shooter is from that camera. Then that's what gets compared -- the distance from the camera location gets drawn as a circle on the graph, and the location of intersection is the location of the shooter. No footage is being stitched together, and time is never compared between cameras, only distance.I checked the guy's math. He did it right. He's spot on here. I didn't check all of the pins, but I checked a couple and it does work. And on top of that, the fact that there even is an intersecting location is itself a form of proof of correctness -- if the math was done incorrectly the circles would be some variety of random, and if you draw that many random circles you will not get one location where all the circles overlap. So either:>1. He did the math right and found the location of the shooter>2. He lied and didn't do any math and drew circles to fabricate a result (which I don't believe because spot checking his math does show its correctness)or>3. He did the math wrong and he needs to go buy a lottery ticket right fucking now because the probability of drawing 7 random circles and having them all approximately intersect is astronomically low
Eglin shill forgot to re-enable his memeflag
>>516718288It's remarkable, how when one of them fucks up, all of the rest of the retards abandon ship and wait for the thread to dieIt's almost like they're in the same office working together to make /pol/ look bad
>>516710438do you feel as if his protruding nipples that day were disrespectful?
>>516715198Goddamn this is a bot lolol, fps has nothing to do with amplitude. Chatgpt is fucking running cover for the jews. Kirk is being jfkd. Audio from jfk shows multi shooters as well. Fuck off with ur frame rates.
>>516709793Look, the guy’s insisting the rooftop shot doesn’t line up with the audio timings, even factoring in those error margins, but that’s because he’s using a basic calc that just multiplies the delay by the speed of sound, like 1141 feet per second at 82 degrees. That spits out short distances, say 0.21 seconds times 1141 is about 240 feet, but it totally skips the fact that the bullet’s supersonic and beats the sound to the mic.The right way is this formula: distance equals delay times (speed of sound times bullet speed) divided by (bullet speed minus speed of sound), with bullet average around 2525 feet per second for a .30-06. Plugging in 0.08 to 0.21 seconds gives 422 feet. The real rooftop to stage gap is roughly 430 feet, which fits snug in the high end, especially with your 10-20 foot wiggle room bumping it to 402-442 feet.Those colorful circles on the maps, showing distances from spots like the balcony or stage left, only overlap close because they’re based on that wrong simple math, making it seem off. Fix it with the proper formula, and they’d stretch out to hit the rooftop dead on, matching the elevated spot perfectly.Bottom line, the audio totally jives with the rooftop when you crunch it correctly. The official story stands. No need to shoehorn in a nearer shooter. It’s all just a calculation slip-up.
>>516715198You completely misunderstood what he did. He did >>516713071 analysis of JUST the audio stream to identify the delta between crack and thump. That creates a specific radius from which the shot must have come from. Do this seven times with seven different cameras (you don’t need to sync because you are looking at the INTERNAL delta in each stream) they will line up and uniquely identify where the shooter was.Which is the little perch just down from the main roof as it has a table chairs. A plant for concealment and three separate means of egress. Also it was confidently “empty” despite being prime seating.
>>516720625Thank you for reposting this from twitter. No, this math is actually wrong. The original poster is not using the visual indication of the bullet impacting -- he's using the sound of the bullet impacting. When you do that you do not need to assume anything about the bullet itself, which makes it a much simpler calculation.To do the math you said you would need to change the timestamp of the bullet arrival to coincide with the visual identification of the bullet hitting Charlie, which happens before the sound of the impact reaches the camera. This would mean, for example (I'm not actually going through and scrubbing footage for this) that you'd use timestamp from 0.08s to say 0.16s instead of 0.08s to 0.21s. And that would again change the value to be substantially shorter than the official story of the sniper on the rooftop.
https://files.catbox.moe/mizpp7.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/s0u4sz.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/2huaxh.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/llv1mk.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/y5wcri.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/9mwrde.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/ssm1th.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/y5v72l.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/ho1fdp.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/lv5me7.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/c6vzme.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/yxn2dn.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/wecqvc.webmlist with all different videos i have, if anyone has better versions or other angles lmk
>>516721999**videos that include the shot**
>>516718252The math is just off because the time difference is the difference from the path of the bullet to the mic and the path of the blast to the mic. This is the same if you measure from about where it hit, so mics near Charlie have correct circles. They will drift if you measure far from where the projectile passes. You’re measuring a hypotenuse minus a leg of a triangle to predict the other leg, and this is about equal if the subtracted leg is zero, which it is if the bullet passes right next to the mic. Either way, mics close to Charlie show the distance is 70ft, not 250ft.
