>this is who 4chan lawyered up with
>2016What did neko shota moon do again for you to be angry at him leftard freakazoid?
>>516763999>spergs can't sarcasm, the post
>>516764116i don't like his profile picture
>>516765830sorry, *avatar
>>516763999> WOW CHECKED> what explains the age gating, social media bans, and EU chat control?CP is growing in amount and velocity due to smart phones granting kids the autonomy of sexual expression. It will not stop because cameras will not be less. It will only be harder to find and scrape, but kids will find a way.In 10 or 20 years, CP will be legal because everyone is involved in it, either looking at it or creating it. It can't continue under the irrational rule of feminists who view every childhood sexual escapade as a rape.
did they lawyer up because the UK government are faggots? give some context please nigger OP retarded faggot
>>516766254>Analog csamThat's prehistoric. Try to produce AI porn for the demographic that likes small tits on women. No matter the negative prompting, age specifications, detailed description of facial attributes, in 8 of 10 cases the Porn AI is going to spit out csam
>>516766770I'm not sure what you're getting at exactly.AI is highly restricted and won't generate anything related to pedophilia or CSCAM, while the companies call the cops on you for forbidden prompts (thought crime). Maybe you're talking about uncensored models used locally.But, yeah, AI certainly adds a wrinkle. What you might have taken weeks to wait for can be generated in seconds. AI could produce in sheer numbers all the CP created in all of history in a week.And now we're arresting people for generating complete fictions. The claim that AI CP is based on real CP is wrong, because AI can recreate CP conceptually, by combining child features with pornographic features, the same way that it can replace a baseball cap with a cowboy hat. So we're arresting people for criminal conceptual combinations, a new low for thought crime.In the end, we have to just accept it and manage it. The alternative is to let the lumpen Pizzagate idiots rule the world.
>>516765830
>>516766254Nah we'll just have AI that automatically scrubs the Internet and people's devices automatically of all illegal content. Doesn't matter what you make if it's instantly scanned and deleted like a virus (which it is, a mind virus).
>>516767780When Bing DALL-E 3 came out my favorite game was getting it to generate loli guro
>>516763999he makes troons so fucking angryits great
>>516767931> WE'LL JUST LET THAT FAGGOT PETER THEIL DELETE OUR SELF-MADE CPYou think he's deleting it, Anon?
>>516767780>t. Faggot that never produced AI pornI am obviously not going to share the specific open source models name, but lets just say, I gave up on trying to have small tited women in the sequences
>>516766770>csam>>>/reddit/
>>516768352What is the current correct term for you disgusting Muslim use for csam these days. Don't mind, I don't want to know
picrel is "Josh" (not his real name) from brit/polhe's 4chan's biggest pedo and he runs a pedo network/discord. he also goes by the name кaни and he uses a proxy site to post CP on 4chan. The mods know too, they protect him and even ban phrases that call him a pedo. They know.
>>516768477the same it has always been: cp>nooo, I want to use the latest leftist newspeakbet you always fly the latest pride flag in your window, too, faggot
>>516768346> afraid of AI generated picture> gives up> cries about it on 4chan> afraid to say the local model's nameWho's a faggot now, faggot?
>>516763999For years they were running ops on /b with messaging apps, this is how it made it into the normieshpere because otherwise normies wouldn't access the deep web, now all they have to do is download an app. Any one of many. /b finally banned the threads but they still exist on /soc, reddit, and X. The /b ban really hampered them, but theyre still around on the same apps. Apparently its all encrypted messaging, but I doubt this was done the way it was without a larger reason. They made it easily accessible and let the threads pop up for years. I wonder what changed?
>>516768811So you are a pedophile. Okay got it. Neither me nor the demographic that pays for ai porn is and I don't plan becoming a csam producer
Also if you see someone mention NL anywhere on social media, this is likely exactly what theyre referencing.
>>516768801It was academic institutional feminists who invented the CSAM acronym, after they felt child pornography was too enticing a phrase, while permitting them to lie about what CP actually is 99% of the time: a kid getting off.CP is the new heliocentrism. Once you get it, and undergo the appropriate mental model shifts, you can't look back on the Official Doctrine as anything other than a lie based on religious faith, in this case faith in the 'innocent child'.
>>516769159Are you implying that most subject are pver the age of 14? Because this is far from the case. It may be that most people interested in younger people prefer above 14, but its certainly not the case that most subjects are 14 or over. Im not even sure id make the other claim either. It also ties in heavily with beastiality, this is think is because both are forms of illegal media and therefore end up being traded in the same circles. Kind of like different drugs.
>>516768956Wow, you with all the accusations> faggot> pedophilewhile crying on 4chan. Why don't you go back to twoXchromosomes and commiserate with your girlfriends?As for women with small tits, sounds a lot like a safe space for pedophiles who aren't comfortable with their attractions and need something to jerk off to while accusing others exactly like themselves of being bad people.We get a lot of that in the lolishota space, as well. Really upstanding citizens who just want to jerk off to a baby being raped, nothing like those immoral monster pedophiles jerking off to real CP, which consists of some kid disrobing in a bathroom and fingering themselves.> God forbid! > Where's muh Charlie Kirk?Thank god we're only looking at women with small tits.
>>516769399Why are you bringing 14 into it?CP is a diverse subject matter, and yes includes all ages. We aren't able to reason about it because we aren't allowed to look at it or conduct research on it, and thus we're not allowed by law to make sense of it.Are you implying that some CP is absolutely horrifying and shouldn't be allowed to exist and the person (adult male) who made it should be publicly excuted? Absolutely.But what does that have to do with the 99% of the rest of CP? Nothing. And that includes younger than 14. 14 isn't some kind of magical number, any better than 18. Just because you've come to accept that as some line in the sand doesn't mean a 13 year old making CP means he should be treated as a massive victim or a criminal.But we'd all have smarter things to say about this if we were allowed to look at it.Picrel depicts a kid of about 11 or 12 getting into online porn and masturbation. That's a bit of truth creeping in.
>>516770091You are correct that 14 is no magical number, however 13 or 14 is where many people put the cutoff at. Thats where they stop being interested or see it as wrong. Thats why I use those numbers. At the heart of the matter is human trafficking. Yes many videos are self made, meaning no actual abuser is directly involved. Other cases do involve a criminal abuser. Its quite telling how defensive you are about these things. It will not change in the future. This is how countries are run, unfortunately. The west runs on blackmail and this is a huge part of it. The part you conveniently leave out is the trafficking aspect for those who are more hands on. Why would you leave this out? You could claim thats a whole other subject but its really not. These aren't just fantasies.
>>516770091Also that pic is just a kid reading something, I wouldn't immediately assume he's looking at porn. You'd have to have a perverted sense of reality to immediately see your picture as what you described. That pic could be an ad for anything at all, it is not implied in any way that he's looking at porn.
>>516770091Also what's very telling is your use of the word diverse to describe the subject matter. I wonder why you might do that?
>>516770091I'll add that your choice to use a boy in your photo leads one to believe this is what you likely are interested in. This is typically seen as even more perverse than going after female minors. Its a perversion of a perversion itself. You could claim that you used it because boys are more likely to look up porn at a young age, but I wouldn't believe you.
Notice how all the pedo freaks in this thread want to molest boys>>516766254>>516767780>>516768811>>516769159>>516769527Pedophilia has always been the natural extension of homosexuality
>>516772192>I'll add that your choice to use a boy in your photo leads one to believe this is what you likely are interested in. This is typically seen as even more perverse than going after female minors. Its a perversion of a perversion itself.No he’s just gayGays are depraved freaks who rape boys
>>516763999ESL moment, lern2context autismo
>>516763999Do CP even exists? It's like Nuke. What will happen if a man watches it? How is this so much censored? What could go wrong? Any boomer american here? They surely had internet befor CSAM implementation.
>>516768956Watching CP = PedophileIs this correct?
>>516770091A serbian film.
>>516763999
