>American military intervention to save Israel is good. >American military intervention to save Ukraine is bad. Make it make sense.
>>517000671Especialy since both countries are equaly jewish...
>>517000837Your math doesn't add up.
>>517000837Russia started this war with an aim to "denazify" Ukraine so let's try and get our copes squared
>>517000671Define military intervention, because America is providing support for both countries, albeit indirectly. Do you mean direct involvement of US troops? I'm pretty sure most Americans would agree that's bad in either scenario.
>>517000837jews constantly jew each other, israel got fucked up because we gave too many of our munitions to ukraine
>>517002115We directly involved ourselves against Iran.
>>517002115they bombed iran you ladyboy how more direct can you get?
>>517001321>inb4 Adolf Shekelgrubberstein was a Zionist shill who killed 50 million white people while Jews were chilling in 5-star resorts
>>517000671ORANGE MAN LITERALLY ARMED THEUKRAINEOBUMMER WAS WEAK AND LET PUTLER TAKE CRIMEA IN 2014
>>517002877WTF BASED
>>517002615>>517002436I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about Israel/Gaza, not Israel/Iran. The latter conflict definitely had direct US involvement, though not on the same level as deploying thousands of US troops. It was a calculated risk that paid off with an (almost) immediate cessation of hostilities. If the bombing mission had failed and Iran had kept fighting, then America would lose face and would have to commit more assets to "finish the job" but I doubt it'd ever escalate to the point of thousands of US troops being mobilized for a ground war. Deploying the army seems to trigger the American populace because their trauma of the Aghanistan and Iraq conflicts, but deploying a few Billion dollar planes to unload hundred million dollar ordinance doesn't carry that kind of stigma because only a handful of people are at risk of dying in those operations.
>>517000671One of them is your master, the other your vassal.
