>>>/g/106676487>"it doesn't say what it says because we retconned it"Lying faggot.YHWH takes young girls for HIMSELF as his share. >>>/g/106676487>The attempt to portray Christianity as endorsing child abuse by citing Old Testament laws fundamentally misrepresents its core teachings. Jesus's extreme language about gouging eyes and becoming eunuchs is recognized as hyperbole emphasizing spiritual urgency, not literal command, while his intervention against stoning adulteresses and his millstone warning—which promises a fate worse than death for those who harm children—establish a definitive ethical standard that protects the vulnerable. This New Covenant explicitly supersedes the Old Testament's legal codes, which, as seen in Deuteronomy 22, were regulatory laws for a specific ancient society aimed at providing for a woman's survival, not endorsing the practice itself. Furthermore, the "damsel" argument is a linguistic red herring; while the term historically denoted a young woman, its meaning in the 17th-century King James Version does not negate the clear, overarching biblical trajectory from ancient societal regulation to the absolute protection of the innocent, a progression that renders any suggestion of biblical support for pedophilia a deliberate and selective misreading. >>>/g/106676487Christianity is the opposite of YHWH's law.Yes YHWH was endorsing taking young girls as brides.He told his soliders to do it.He took a share of young girls for himself.He calls the man the Ba'al (master), of the female.He made laws that gave the man the girl child after rape (tahphas).And YHWH is _RIGHT_
>its meaning in the 17th-century King James Version does not negate the clear, overarching biblical trajectory from ancient societal regulation to the absolute protection of the innocent, a progression that renders any suggestion of biblical support for pedophilia a deliberate and selective misreading. WRONG dipshit.You ADDING a newtestament and CLAIMING you DEFEATED YHWH's Law :DOES NOT MAKE IT SO.White FAGGOT FUCK.
"it's meaning in the 17th century doesn't change the fact that we've rejected YHWH's law"Wow, such insight.The only option here is to kill.We're done talking.Whites will never allow men to marry young girl virgins no matter what.Christians are the enemy of men , and the friends of women.
I hate jews so much
>>517041897Marry lolis.
end yourself Mike, you stupid faggot
>>517040473>Jesus's extreme language about gouging eyes and becoming eunuchs is recognized as hyperbole emphasizing spiritual urgency, not literal command, while his intervention against stoning adulteresses and his millstone warning—which promises a fate worse than death for those who harm children—establish a definitive ethical standard that protects the vulnerable.What's the actual basis to believe this other than "I want it to be true because the former makes me feel uncomfortable and the latter affords me righteous indignation."
