Say no to booksDont have your mind polluted by other peoples thoughts, if you allow yourself you will come to same conclusions on your own pace and with path that makes sense.Be a free thinker
You're either creative or you're not. It's genetic. Reading lets uncreatives fake it by giving them building blocks to stick together. It gives creatives context with which they can avoid or subvert tropes.
>read books>Cherry pick the good and bad ideas of the author, taking notes throughout>Come to completely different conclusions from the author>This confuses and enrages OP the NPC
goyim the book, its real, everyone follows it, right. you totally dont see it for yourself, no? good. go home.
>>517196442you do not posses capacity to know whats good or badFailure to understand that is why you specifically should not read at all
Keep scrolling bullshit on your phone, tool
>>517196179lip fillers.next.
>>517196528This is 1:1 same rage and denial you get from vaxxed people telling them they fucked up with it
>>517196179Do you think she ever read a self help book? Shes rewarded for not reading books. Its just sex. remember that guys. Its just sex. Until you get tired of it.
>>517196179This only makes sense with fake shit like philosophy. Reading fiction for fun is fine
>>5171961792/10 bait. consider drinking more rakija
>>517196179what if we read quran?
>>517196179Yeah after elementary school reading just pollutes your mind with Jewish ideas
>>517196179>haven't read a single book in my entire life>have 0 creativityyou sure about that?
no joke, i'm one hundred percent sure this is the dumbest thread on all of the 4chanses
if you dont eat this you not brown
>>517196179Worst advice ever. The smartest and most successful people on the planet are enthusiastic readers. https://www.moneytalksnews.com/slideshows/billionaires-who-prove-reading-can-make-you-a-success/
if you dont drink this you not brown
>>517196179I had this exact thought the other daynow I read your thoughtsand realize we're the same
>>517196179you create things by borrowing ideas from other people, we always build from previous work, we don't create anything from scratch.
>>517197179>you create things by borrowing ideas from other people, we always build from previous work, we don't create anything from scratch.we stand on the shoulders of giants.That's literally the definition of söyciety
>>517196944There is an argument to be made against you and that is that you actually never tried to expose to other people what 0 creativity means to you.Most creative people never really tried to be judged and expose themselves and when they do they have years processing to do while they realize their 0 creativity is actually top 0.1% of global population creative ability.
>>517196179This is the dumbest take possible
>>517196179books are alright you dumb serb
>>517196179>Say no to booksflag checks out.
>>517197303>tf>tp
>>517196179An entire book and be condensed into 1 symbol.
>>517197038>the smartest people on the planet>billionairesI get why euro's make fun of us
>>517197303I was thinking the same thing when I came to respond to this thread, but now that you've declared it, I'm having second thoughts
>>517197454just a tourist redditor dont know why you even respond to le source people
>>517196179>Use Jewish media instead.
>>517197517talmudovision is not implied there, just dont read books and corrupt yourself with them
>>517196179Reading is for fags and education is for troons.We are better off without it.
>>517196521Who the fuck would ever ask a serb advice on being imaginative?
You're reading the wrong books
>>517197647i dont know
>>517196521Secularist do not, but religion exists to provide an unchanging standard. If you reject religion, then sure, your morals are completely subjective and are only your subjective preferences. This is why atheists are retarded, and are incapable of ever creating an argument that appeals to morality. If morality is a matter of personal preference, then their subjective morality is just as valid as mine or anyone else's.
>>517196179What you're saying applies to basically any consumption of things outside of yourself, not only reading.
>>517197723>AustrianExactly my point.Nice try
>>517196179>he says on the internet where his "free mind" is in greater dangerKill yourself but read a book first.
>>517197771To some extent yes, but reading books is intentional effort the other things can be shrugged away
>>517196521Such a meretricious argument. and believe me, we know that you don't read books; no need to overstate it.
>>517197853you are exempt from this threadmutt you should read, but history books
>>517197470>I'm having second thoughtsso if I'd said women are nice you'd become a faggot?jesus you people are retarded
>>517196179You are a NPC if books don't make works your imagination. Might as well be quadruple boosted
>>517196179reading non-fiction*
>>517198009so far 80% of you dont even understand whatREADING KILLS CREATIVITY means
>>517197978erm, we hate women here
>>517197918Actually movies/TV/vidya are a lot more insidious, they trick your brain into thinking what you're seeing is real even when you consciously know it's not.
>>517196179It all made sense to me after reading this
>>517197973History books are written by jews
i had a roommate who thought this and sounded mildly schizoid. he was retarded
>>517198220They dont require a fraction of effort that reading requiresno, i tought about it and im claiming what im claiming.
>>517197978>if I'd said women are niceI don't know how to break it to you, anon.
>>517198385but reading is good for you?
>>517196179It doesn't really work that way if you are awake and aware that writers generally have a degree of bias on which ever topic or moral conundrum presented to the reader even in fictitious, fantasy literature. You know, instead of just using reading as a way to download shit directly to your brain with no filter like an NPC, try thinking about the context and weight if its true or up to your personal moral standards.
>>517198316>sky>emigrated from russian empireIt's funny, I already knew just by looking at the font and title
>>517197973I've read more books than exists in your country.>Exempt I forfeit my exemption and raise you Wizard's First Rule
>>517198386Most geniuses are schizos
>>517196179>tfw no 15 year old Swedish gf
>>517198584Most schizos are rarely wrong
>>517196179Telling zoomers not to read… may as well lecture dolphins on the risks of drunk driving…
>>517196179nobody reads anymore, faggot.
>>517198507Books are a whetstone and your mind is the blade that parts the pages
>>517198410Yes that's part of the problem. You actually go into kind of a hypnotic state when you're absorbing video media.
>>517198780check the fucking thread jewjeetsu
>>517197918So then you're saying the most creative people are those who never learned to read or write, then the most creative cultures are ones that never developed a writing system
>>517198978This is what i realized with this ideaThat you cant explain the concept presented in OP to people who cant differentiate necessary means from self harming them with excess.
>>517196179Tell us once and for all, OP. Are you fucking retarded? Have you tried reading several hundred books rather than the two you struggled through your high school senior year?
>>517198853How the hell are you in a hypnotic state while analyzing and scrutinizing the shit you're watching?
You're missing out. Books are cheap and quiet. Fiction can be incredible. When you read good fiction, you can't put it down.And non-fiction? In comparison to those raised on an intellectual diet of shitposts and podcasts, if you read actual books you have a much deeper level of knowledge and understanding on the subjects that interest you. It's like comparing your mate at the pub to fucking Einstein. Of course what you read matters. A lot of shit books no doubt. But that is the same with every medium.
>>517196179>Great authors who didn't read: 0
op is right, i've always said this.>t. successful 140 iq non npc
>>517199279See this person for example.Do you think that he would for example, even if provided study after study of clear in his face evidence that books are not good for you, at all, in overwhelming majority of cases, without shadow of a doubt proven as a fact.Do you think that guys who read several hundred books would accept that as true and concede that he was retarded in his doing?Its unvaxed vs vaxed, book edition
OP is a retard who can't navigate a table of contents and skim the page for the good shit and has no idea what percentage of authors are absolute trash or gold.
>>517196179POV: You're Black man with a BBC.
>>517199230Creative people can use outside information to create. If you aren't taking inspiration from others you are taking it from nature or the people you interact with. A lot of people in societies without reading aren't creative, it's not something that exists only when you can't read.
>>517200239>creativty>outside informationi dont know if i can explain this no offense
>>517199281You're not but it's easy to start zoning out and passively absorbing, more than when you're reading
>>517196179>you will come to same conclusions on your own pace
>>517196179Yes reading /pol/. Get off /pol/ and read words from sane people.
>>517196179Let me show you the path to retardation /pol/ Not being exposed to myriad ideas is GOOD for you.
>>517200034it's worse, that is a Serbian. Most likely the diaspora between India and Arabs with just a hint of Slav known as Chechens. Their commentary is direct proof of why you are not supposed to allow gypsies to stay in your country.
>>517196179can confirm, i activly chose this in my youth some sort of divine interventiion i guess
>>517197768>If morality is a matter of personal preference, then their subjective morality is just as valid as mine or anyone else's.Correct, because it is.
>>517197259no i legit have no creativity. I can't draw, I can't sing, I can't create music, I can't do tricks on skateboards/bikes whatever viechle you could do it on, I can't think of original ideas, I literally am not creative i just consume.
>>5172015102 things you need to fullfill here1. actually do creative stuff2. show it to publicThen weight your ability.
>>517196179Reading non ideological fiction is ok, but you're right, you should never read philosophy or philosophy dressed up as fiction unless you want to be a thoughtless dolt.
>>517201467For you, which is what makes you retarded. You can't even tell someone that fucking a 3 year old child wrong. It might go against your preferences, but who cares, it is not against theirs, and their preference is just as valid as yours.
>>517201324to clarify i read thoose i had to because of society™ but when searching for answers/deciding i didn´t use >>517200688outside informationI used thinking/feeling/instinct in combination.that combines everything you learned + everything you are
>>517201648do what exactly? Draw a fucking stick figure? make peoples ears bleed? Go to a comedy show and have no idea wtf to even say because I don't know how to talk to large crowds? Bro Like I said I have ZERO creativity.
>>517201793also I did try to do creative shit, I use to be a twitch streamer, No one ever came to watch me. No one gives a fuck about someone just playing the game and not talking. I have not learned to do public speaking and I never will learn.
>>517201710in that instance 1 would probably kill the other because you can´t unite the morals.if you wanna talk group morals you need 3 ppl
>>517202059Oh, so majority morals make right? Me an my buddy decided that raping you in the ass is morally good. 2 vs 1, our morality is better.
I feel the same OP. But you do need to expose your self, not in a Bulgarian way that gets you arrested but expose your mind to different thinking patterns after recording your own.Write the things you want and then read it after you get exposed.
>>517202218i´ts real if you don´t have artifical support you gonna end up in that situationthey don´t make right in a moral sense of way if you believe in higher morals but in a group think kind of way wich is what would happen in our theoretical scenario
>>517196179>READING KILLS CREATIVITY
>>517202375I don't care about what governs, I am talking about what is moral. A law isn't moral just because the majority approve, that is the point. Gang rape is still immoral, regardless of how many people think otherwise. I know this because my morals are not just preferences.
>>517196179If people read a newspaper for all their information, instead of every other medium of propaganda that's replaced the newspaper this last 2 decades, we wouldn't be looking at the end of human society as we know it.Every paper getting bought out by the same companies in the 90's was a scary prospect for anyone alive then, one that has been completely forgotten after 30 years of jewvision, jewspeak and jewscreen brainwashing. My dad used to yell 'liars' at the tv during the first Iraq war. Now he watches golf and votes liberal. The only fixing that is death.
>>517202661>A law isn't moral just because the majority approve, that is the point.then why is it moral ?and to wich timeframe does it appear moralthat shit changes over time
>>517198853The refresh rate, colours, brightness levels, and audio were all designed from the get go to do exactly that. Why? Look around you. That's why.
>>517196179waifu?!
>>517196179if you dont have a past, you dont know where you are going. reading books puts you temporary limited life into perspective & gives you identity & purpose. our ancestors were like us & we continue the fight, like reading mein kampf & german philosophy makes you understand yoursefl & your task in life. if you understand the trajectory, the momentum of your nation you can use that energy tp generate traction.
You’re wrong but it’s better to read 1 good deeply than 1 million books shallowly.
>>517199281Are you fucking retarded? It's designed to make you NOT scrutinise and analyse the information you're receiving. It's designed to plant the information in your mind as logical reality, instead of insane propaganda. It's called brainwashing, and it's been very, very effective.
>>517196179>Be a free thinker
>>517197723Nikolaus Tessler was Austrian just like Hitler
>>517203031the quote makes this even more ironic heheseriously i can remember several time i came across a thought only to pick it up later that somebody in the past had had it too.that´s what op is refering to imoit also makes you realise that that the experts are faggots too
>>517203281extended.
>>517197648The book of Mormon, really?
>>517196179Echo chamber is creative death, obviously. Immitate, then innovate.
>>517202866I don't want to repeat myself, I already answered this prior to you joining the discussion. If your "morals" don't come from an unchanging standard (i.e. religion), then they are just your personal preferences, not morals. Logically this means that you believe everyone's morality is likewise a personal preference. Whose morality is correct, and why should anyone care about you making arguments that appeal to morality? It has all the authority of your favorite ice cream flavor, it is not an argument, nor hold up to any form of logical consistency. If you have an external and unchanging standard, it doesn't matter if something was done 500 years ago or today, the morality of the matter is the same. Whether or not something was legal then and not now (or vice-versa) is irrelevant in determining the morality of the matter. As we already established, morality is not decided by the majority (i.e. gang rape, state-sponsored genocide, etc). You keep conflating morality with law and/or modern cultural trends, which is pure lunacy that even you would not agree with given a few examples that I am sure you can think up.
>>517204304>I don't want to repeat myself, I already answered this prior to you joining the discussion.point me to it i don´t see it your first post was literally >>517201710>If you have an external and unchanging standardi would agree but we don´t have that not even in religion. time changes. name 1 thing that stayed the same in your religion over timeto make myself clear i think morals evolved out of neccecity but pls elaborate with >a few examples that I am sure you can think up.
>>517204936>I think morals evolved Evolved from what? Your personal preferences?
>>517203354>seriously i can remember several time i came across a thought only to pick it up later that somebody in the past had had it too.yeah & in germans greatest poets & composers you will find your racial family & understand how much in common you have with them. their spirits come alive in the present, as though they become alive to guide you through life & cheer you on. the mystery of blood.
>>517196179One must also remember that of itself the multitude is mentally inert. It clings to its old habits and is not naturally prone to read something which does not conform to its own pre-established beliefs or does not contain what it hopes to find there. Therefore, a piece of writing which has a particular tendency is for the most part read only by those who are in sympathy with it. Only a leaflet or a placard, on account of its brevity can hope to arouse a momentary interest in those whose opinions differ from it.-Dazu kommt, daß die Masse der Menschen an sich faul ist, träge im Gleise alter Gewohnheiten bleibt und von sich selbst aus nur ungern zu etwas Geschriebenem greift, wenn es nicht dem entspricht, was man selber glaubt, und nicht das bringt, was man sich erhofft. Daher wird eine Schrift mit einer bestimmten Tendenz meistens nur von Menschen gelesen werden, die selbst dieser Richtung schon zuzurechnen sind. Höchstens ein Flugblatt oder ein Plakat können durch ihre Kürze damit rechnen, auch bei einem Andersdenkenden einen Augenblick lang Beachtung zu finden.-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
>be young child>learned to read easily, blast through the curriculum for reading>complete a 4-year journey in under 8 months>"wow that's really impressive anon, but reading is good for you, how about you try to read some of these books">retarded children's fiction in idiotic nigger-friendly language, 50-70 pages>hey teach you mind if I read Harry Potter?>"Oh yes I would that book is for older kids, you should read books suited for your age">7 years old>slug through it to 8 years old>new teacher>"You're already done with everything? Jesus, ok uh you still have to read though">the books are still stupid nigger fiction>"Hey we've got an idea for you, how about you go to that class in 5th grade and help one of them read">it's a niggress>it's a book for 3rd grade>only went once>didn't read anymore, nobody batted an eyelid while I stared at atlases imagining genocidal map paintingSometimes it's not the literature, or your own abilities.It can simply be the environment that fails to respect where you are on your journey.I could've been reading Art of War, but they wouldn't let me.Greek philosophy? "That's for university you're not there buddy".And I wasn't the only one.The education system makes people hate reading by forcing them to read shitty fiction made for a shitty audience.It doesn't inspire the mind whatsoever, and then kids grow up only reading social media and forum posts, maybe a technical schematic or a manual.I've seen more inspirational shit on /pol/ than I have ever read in primary & secondary school, and both colleges I went to.But does that mean you shouldn't read?No.Filter the litterature out. If it doesn't feel right, don't read it. If you can't stop, keep going.
>>517205544survial if i kill everyone i see i will die to with no offspringok donethat other guy that killed everyone but 1 female and fucked the female will have kidsbooom it´s bad to kill
>>517196179I agree with you, but this is an unconventional thought that will surely draw a lot of fire.I think you are correct though, that reading removes you from your own direct interaction with inner and outer reality.
>>517205930That is called utilitarianism.Now under that "moral" framework, explain why fucking the body of a dead child is wrong.
>>517205807i believe to be genetic memories to be a thing, maybe if not only triggered by certain happenings/emotions.
>>517203354hitlers history teacher:Probably my whole future life was determined by the fact that I had a teacher of history who understood, as few others understand, how to make this viewpoint prevail in teaching and in examining. This teacher was Dr. Leopold Poetsch, of the Realschule at Linz. He was the ideal personification of the qualities necessary to a teacher of history in the sense I have mentioned above. An elderly gentleman with a decisive manner but a kindly heart, he was a very attractive speaker and, was able to inspire us with his own enthusiasm. Even to-day I cannot recall without emotion that venerable personality whose enthusiastic exposition of history so often made us entirely forget the present and allow ourselves to be transported as if by magic into the past. He penetrated through the dim mist of thousands of years and transformed the historical memory of the dead, past into a living reality. When we listened to him we became afire with enthusiasm and we were sometimes moved even to tears. It was still more fortunate that this master was able not only to illustrate the past by examples from the present, but from the past, he was also able to draw a lesson for the present. He understood better than any other the everyday problems that were then agitating our minds. The national fervour which we fell in our own small way was utilised by him as an instrument of our education, inasmuch as he often appealed to our national sense of honour, for in that way he maintained order and held our attention much more easily than he could have done by any other means. It was because I had such a master that history became my favourite subject. As a natural consequence, but without the conscious connivance of my teacher, I then and there became a young rebel. But who could have studied German history under such a teacher and not become an enemy of that State whose rulers exercised such, a disastrous influence on the destinies of the German nation?ah-mk
>>517206414german original:Es wurde vielleicht bestimmend für mein ganzes späteres Leben, daß mir das Glück einst gerade für Geschichte einen Lehrer gab, der es als einer der ganz wenigen verstand, für Unterricht und Prüfung diesen Gesichtspunkt zum beherrschenden zu machen. In meinem damaligen Professor Dr. Leopold Pötsch, an der Realschule zu Linz, war diese Forderung in wahrhaft idealer Weise verkörpert. Ein alter Herr, von ebenso gütigem als aber auch bestimmten Auftreten, vermocht er besonders durch eine blendende Beredsamkeit uns nicht nur zu fesseln, sondern wahrhaft mitzureißen. Noch heute erinnere ich mich mit leiser Rührung an den grauen Mann, der uns im Feuer seiner Darstellung manchmal die Gegenwart vergessen ließ, uns zurückzauberte in vergangene Zeiten und aus dem Nebelschleier der Jahrtausende die trockene geschichtliche Erinnerung zur lebendigen Wirklichkeit formte. Wir saßen dann da, oft zu heller Glut begeistert, mitunter sogar zu Tränen gerührt. Das Glück ward um so größer, als dieser Lehrer es verstand, aus Gegenwart Vergangenes zu erleuchten, aus Vergangenheit aber die Konsequenzen für die Gegenwart zu ziehen. So brachte er denn auch, mehr als sonst einer, Verständnis für all die Tagesprobleme, die uns damals in Atem hielten. Unser kleiner nationaler FanatismusGeschichte Lieblingsfach 13 ward ihm ein Mittel zu unserer Erziehung, indem er, öfter als einmal an das nationale Ehrgefühl appellierend, dadurch allein uns Rangen schneller in Ordnung brachte, als dies durch andere Mittel je möglich gewesen wäre. Mir hat dieser Lehrer Geschichte zum Lieblingsfach gemacht. Freilich wurde ich, wohl ungewollt von ihm, auch damals schon zum jungen Revolutionär. Wer konnte auch unter einem solchen Lehrer deutsche Geschichte studieren, ohne zum Feinde des Staates zu werden, der durch sein Herrscherhaus in so unheilvoller Weise die Schicksale der Nation beeinflußte?AHMK
>>517196179How about the BIBLE?
>>517206165it has no benefits (((except))) , would even expose you to disease if rotten.
op and the rest of this thread is just describing nigger culturedo the opposite to deniggerfy an individual and his society
>>517196179I would do bad stuff to them boobs.
Good thread.I've always said written knowledge is a corrupt manifestation of the mind.
Dey read rap lyrics and beat poetry.
>>517198085I really don't think so, I mean I REALLY don't think so...but it's almost as if he's actually a very intelligent troll at this point.
>>517206374hence why hitler prophecises that his spirit will rise fomr the grave one day. we are bound by our nordic blood, one racial spirit, jung -collective unconsciousness.picrel depicts that sort of recurring spirit/soul or 'reincarnation' if you will.
>>517196179Man I can’t believe glowies are getting young men to actually skip college this way. You guys really love an uneducated populace.
>>517196179
Shout out to you op ! All people do is quote and reference.They never establish a stand alone psych.. They don't seem to question. Evolve abstract thinking
>>517205906De Dode Hoek was pretty good, man, come on.
burn all poets! poets will rotten your soul.all poets,writers erc are rats!
>>517206823not that it´s like college would provide you with anything useful other than learning how to behave around nutjobs
burn all poets! poets will rotten your soul.all poets and writers are rats!
>>517206414picrel is btw the history teacher hitler talks about in mein kampf, upon returning to linz he encountered him.
>>517206823I mean there is a kernel of truth in my hate but do you think all those people with their degrees and their average intelligence will overcome the offset of the rich and the banking system siphoning off the resources like the cut off her tits and said it was a good decision. But the catch here is that is without an alternative it is a ratrace ultimately and that makes everything like an animus malus. Hence they reject science because ultimately it is like that truck driver you tell that you have to learn to code just in a more holistic systematic way.Also i ve thought about your "immigration is good thing" you subhuman. Imagine if i would just put the germans into france and the french into germans. Are the germans now french and the french now german?
>>517207491According to our great philosophers of our time only palestine has a right to defend itself because it is overt but we dont, the germans are now french and the french are now german because in this case the land is now arbitrary.
>>517196179just read little & only the very best literature, mein kampf is a obligatory read, or nietzsche also relevant today & is easy digestable. one should learn what already has been tried in order not to repeat the past, it saves you time & effort. people before us already went through situations & tell the tale so we dont have to make the same mistakes again & again.
>>517206734Y dey be act like cow oga
>>517207757Only read manifestos. SiegeTurner DiariesPogrom etc
Don't be creative. Repackage Golden Age Hollywood films. Nobody's watched any of them in the past 40 years and film buffs will think "Oh boy they're paying homage to something great" instead of "What a ripoff"
>>517196179any non-fiction book cam be condensed into about 4 pages. brevity is the soul of whit and also intelligence
>>517208673close
I feel this way about music and normies get mad when I play techno or classical music instead of pop/rap/rock with lyrics. I get a bit of synthesia with music and have little 'music videos' and having no lyrics helps with the visuals
>>517206560>it has no benefitsMost things don't. If "having benefit" is your requirement for morality, then you are going to be in real trouble. >disease if rotten.I didn't say the child was rotten. They just died 2 minutes ago. Now tell me a single cohesive argument that can be applied universally on why this is "wrong". I don't care about it being illegal, you thinking it is gross, etc. Why is morally wrong?You see, you run yourself in circular arguments, none of your "rules" can be really be applied, and it simply comes down to some arbitrary metric that you make up in your head.
>>517196421This. Same with intelligence. You sre or you aren't. Someone can have genes that are inactive however, but most people lack the genes for intelligence.
>>517210883you would damage the child if you would fuck your childs you would damage their organs and such it has no benefit rather it does damage. in the end it could cripple a groupthe soul aspect is another thing. unless you wish for something perticular.but morally it depends on where you stand
>>517211513>you would damage the child if you would fuck your childs you would damage their organs and suchit has no benefit rather it does damage.The child is freshly dead, you aren't hurting anything. You can use an adult for this hypothetical if makes you feel better. Even assuming that you were damaging it, why would damaging a dead body be morally wrong?>the soul aspect is another thingWe talking about morality nigga.>but morally it depends on where you standNo it doesn't. Morality is more than your personal preference, hence you are failing to grasp this, and why all of your arguments fall apart when the logic of them is tested.
>>517196179Black people don't read, it's why they are more creative - more rap music, hip hop. Blacks dominate world music because they don't read.
>>517212490it might be immoral to you but not to someone else what isn´t there to understand that moral isn´t universal.
>>517196179Books are only useful for verbal iq.Guess who's high in verbal iq and average in everything other intelligence.Read to become jewish.
>>517212901there is only 1 IQ, verbal IQ is jewish horseshit and it simply does not exist.Also not the point we talk about here.
>>517196442What I do is >amass a list of thousands of books (mostly non-fiction) I want to read that is forever growing exponentially>once I start reading one of those books, if it doesn't grab me by the horns immediately, I flip around the books and if nothing is grabbing me by the horns then I move it to the back of the list and move on to then next book
>>517212820Nigger, morality is universal, it only isn't if you decide morality by your own preferences, that is the entire fucking point of this conversation. I feel like I am in trying to have a philosophical debate with an NPC that just keeps repeating their lines in a loop, regardless of them demonstrated to be fallacious and fail basic logic tests.I'm done, anon. Good luck with your preferences.
>>517200858
>>517196179>Say no to booksBe an illiterate toothless subhuman
>>517196179if you cant make up an AMV in your head to the song youre listening too you arnt creative
>>517207884sure sure, american fanfiction, not bad but i would suggest you go to the source, that being hitler, rosenberg, theodor fritsch, gottfried feder, dietrich eckart, houston stewart chamberlain, rudolf jung, ludendorff, the individuals who gave the initial impulses for the modern völkisch movement in germany & of whom many were friends with hitler. do some archeological digging to fully understand how it all began. basically we know the main plotline but those are the origin stories, the prequels if you will, how it all started, the humble beginnings.
>>517215188particularly chamberlains works eminate the aryan spirit so well. its a revelation.
>>517214447its fine, some people just want to be led by their emotions without much of a hassle. hitler writes about such types here:>>517205888especially the unlearned people often are stronger in their instincts thus not yet muddied in their minds with memorised filler information like we use to teach kids these days.
>>517203346Hitlerin was Russian just like hist brother Stalin
>>517196179>Say no to booksNah, fuck you. Sincerely, the PHD who can win a bar fight.
>>517206967As fucking if, more Americans need to go we’d have less of a retardation problem if they went.
"Don't read other people's thoughts in writing," the pajeet posted on the internet. And the world became a tiny bit stupider, and somewhere a cat farted.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dY5AexBwtoU
also close your eyes so you don't see what others are doing and cope themcut off your ears too
