When USA is getting their advanced hypersonic missiles?
>>517254879We probably do and have probably have for the forever anon. American policy is if it isn't a deterrent then it's not announced. Everybody knows this
>>517254879How accurate is it? I can’t find data.
May we see it?
>>517254879I dunno, we don’t really feel a need to invade our neighbor and kill 1 million of our men? So don’t need to showcase anything.But keep being retards!
atomic armed submarines the shitdepopulate china in 10min
>>517254879mach 24 btw.https://www.the-express.com/news/us-news/184974/us-navy-launches-multiple-ballistic
>>517254879eh russia is on track to find out in about two weeks
>>517254879We had that shit since forever dude. They are not worth it.
>>517255184It's sub minute of nuke accurate.
>>517255869these are SLBMs with nuclear charges armageddon weapons, not conventional missiles.
>>517255869Not the same thing and you know it.
>>517255111>>517254879The USA has been testing them but its not a high priority. The reason Russia focuses so hard on that is because the USA spent all the time post 9/11 developing anti ballistics. So a faster missile means they can avoid those systems.The USA is smart again in this case because it allowed them to focus on better tech. Like they have stealth missiles now... if you can imagine that. And Russia is dumb because they are just focusing on bigger and faster. Germany also did this and failed miserably against the US because the US developed heat seeking missiles.All of that said.. if that hypersonic is nuclear tipped the USA can't stop it with any of what they have now. So it might not matter this time. If the USA wanted hypersonic missiles they could just buy a whole bunch of them.
Yeah, you've noticed Russia spent their land army on kohols while preserving their air force for some future hypothetical conflict in Europe. I'm sure those missiles are capable of blowing up a few apartment buildings. We're now going to remind the chat that Russia's economy is smaller than South Korea.
>>517257339Stealth missiles do not exist just like stealth jets, literally a marketing gimmick
>>517254879Hypersonic missiles are to fast to shoot down but cannot travel very far or carry a very large payload because they get to hot to fast and nobody has figured out how to stop the over heating issue. That is why the usa doesn't have any, they are famously unreliable.
>>517255111>Appear strong when you are weak
>>5172551847 meters from the pinpoint
>>517257493Yet somehow they have more nukes than you doI guess you can try throwing GDP on them kek
>>517257554no its real its just people don't understand how they work. Its not complete stealth its radar stealth. They have other ways of spotting them. But its still nice to have a missile or a jet that can evade radar.
>>517255869Ah yeah, these missiles work oh so great for the Royal Navy, but they're not bad missiles.In fact it's the only US ICBM that's not total garbage. Russia has like 3 or 4 better models however, and even China has better land based ICBMs than the USA, with their SLBMs also getting close.tl;dr cringe
>>517258398Stealth missiles aren't even new? But that's cruise missiles. There's no hypersonic stealth because it creates a giant ass plasma flare and a huge amount of heat.Not too bad tho, since especially if it can maneuver it's practically impossible to intercept, whether you know it's coming in 5 minutes or not.
>>517258259muh nukes. putin is a bourgeois nigger and you know it.
>>517258816I didn't say hypersonic. I just said the US focused less on hypersonic and more on tech. Like anti ballistics, stealth, etc....
>>517258893Still I think most people with some remote grasp on reality prefer Putin over the current flavour of US president, although I guess Obama wasn't that bad. Inferior to Putin, but not a complete shitshow.
>>517258893>muh GDP*.
You're Putin. You have a house on the black sea coast and a big 100m dollar boat to protect. Also, don't forget to botox inject your face.
>>517258961May be better to say the USA has a chronic tendency to cancel their advanced weapons programs.The few things that actually make it to the end are alright tho.
>>517257207Launching a ballistic from a plane doesn't make it muh hypersonic
>>517259155Ill agree with that I guess... Most of our tech came from war efforts.
>>517254879One thing I have learned is that Putin is a giant coward. But I'd really like to see him try anything so he can be pulverized in an instant. Or the CIA might just get a Chechen to his stuff his cock deep inside Putun's throat and then make the video go viral
>>517259389Without all the cancelling I don't think anyone would be able to touch your shit.Look at something like the F-22. There's still nobody else with a plane like that in service. It's only slowly reaching that point, and this is in part the USA's own fault (and Israel's) as blueprints are stolen or spying happens.You would have had a kinzhal 20 years ago if it wasn't cancel by one of the thousand people that apparently can decide to ditch a development program in the USA.
>>517254879when russia wins the war in 2 weeks
>>5172548792028 at the earliest. They already have prototypes but the performance hasn’t been good.
>>517254879me when I see mig-31
>>517258398To be more precise it's stealth to specific wave length radars.Long wavelength radars can pick up stealth planes.
>>517259734Our boomer scientists and our Great Gen scientists were really good. Whatever took place after ww2 completely fucking destroyed our ability to produce that kinda stuff anymore.
>>517259636Nigga, Russia would have no difficulty obliterating your entire top level leadership in 30 minutes without even using nukes.>get hazelnutted by the submarine
Seriously Oreshnik is no joke, especially if, as it seems, it's an SLBM.
>>517260021Even the fucking B2 bomber design dates back to the 1970s. It’s crazy how much american military tech has stagnated since Reagan, even before the end of the cold war.
>>517260021Yep. No lie detected.
>>517260267It's understandable to a degree if you consider the collapse of the Soviet Union. Not like they were the bad guys and had any intention to attack the USA, but with that threat gone and Russia busy unfucking itself there literally were no enemies. 2000s China was a nothingburger, military wise.But they've been complacent for too long, and the MIC became ever more inefficient.
>>517260481>Not like they were the bad guys and had any intention to attack the USA
>>517260481china went ballistic the last 20years, absolutely insane
>>517260481Yeah. If you only look at military and air force procuring, it might not look that bad at first, just slow. But if you look at their naval projects, you can immediately see that their MIC has been terribly mismanaged for 20+ years.
>>517260611I see this more as supporting my argument than anything else. They had their hands full doing Soviet things.Even Central Europe they had no intention of attacking. What would that even accomplish? Annexing unfriendly territory fucking blows.Now of course if the USA had been a hapless retard they may have pushed it off the cliff, but obviously that wasn't the case. In fact the USA was persistently incredibly belligerent.
>>517260677It's because America needs an enemy and is willing to pay for it if necessary. You realize the only reason China has risen into anything is because of the fat kike Henry Kissinger and US billionaire investors, correct?
>>517259964Me:good, you:bad isn't a moral compass, stop deluding yourself. >>517260481It's the same in every institution. No matter its size, as soon as the pressure to fulfill its mission becomes weaker, bullshit happens because of complacency and corruption. The worst problem of the US right now isn't even the tech, it's the human resources. Their armed forces have become a big kindergarten for misfits.
>>517254879>Missile almost impossible to stopWhere it will land, nobody knows
>>517254879Hypersonic missiles aren't on our radar.Our current goals are better HIV meds for fags and making it a crime to police niggers and spics
>>517254879This is retarded. Hypersanics are easier to stop not harder. >faster speed = harder to maneuver = more predictable >slower speed = easier to maneuver = less predictable That’s why Israeli missiles hit 100% of their targets in Iran but Iranian missiles missed 99% of the time.
>>517260873>America needs an enemy and is willing to pay for it if necessarykek, well put >>517260957It's a shame, but typical. Had the USA wanted to the world could be fixed by now, politically.No, not by murdering everybody but genuinely working together.In fact China was one such example, after Nixon's visit et cetera. China has to thank the USA to some degree, for working with them - although they did this only to piss off the Soviets and eventually realized that China could become strong too.>time for trade war
>>517261065Literally rams through the entire planet and out the other end because it can't be stopped.
Responses so far itt.>We already have them but we don't care about using them>Acshually they're bad and suck>America is actually 50 years ahead and has future weapons so they don't even need it>Have you seen our gdp?Have we hit all the spectrums of cope?What else are we missing?
>>517261299And can't detonate eiither apparently
The U.S. Air Force has begun building the F-47, its sixth-generation NGAD fighter, with leaders pushing to have it flying by 2028The F-47 is expected to fuse paradigm-shifting stealth with AI-enabled targeting, laser and hypersonic options, and a projected 2,000-mile range—roughly doubling the F-35’s reach for Pacific operations.-Accelerated timelines are influenced by China’s emerging J-36 and J-50 concepts and its fast production capacity
>>517254879>biden says>2022Peak russian failed propaganda.
>>517261254I wonder who would want infinity wars over world peace?
>>517261221sure thing, that's why Trump had to bail out of Iran and drag Israel out of that conflictgo back to intimidating Venezuela, that's as much as you can still do
>>517260021>whatever took place after ww2man i wonder... \
>>517254879The Minuteman 1 entered service in 1962, with a top speed of 15,000 mph. This is 3 times the speed of "hypersonic".
>>517261509How many more buzz words can you put in there pal>We put chat gpt into the planeAmazing
>>517261331The US has them and they are in service, the actual race is for maneuverable hypersonics, which the Russian Kinzhal is not
South Korea has presented, for the first time, imagery of its Hycore hypersonic cruise missile, showing the actual weapon during its flight testing. The Hycore is part of a fast-growing arsenal of advanced weapons that Seoul is developing
>>517261216I hope you get your meds soon, bro, but DARPA is alsways coming up with some pretty cool stuff.
>>517261544The MIC for one. It's a hammer desperate to find new nails so it can justify its existence.
>>517261761US has Dark Eaglehttps://youtu.be/a-xsSFyDY6Q
>>517254879Why do shitskins, chinks and vatniggers cream themselves over hypersonics as if they're some sort of superweapon? Also here's your "nearly unbeatable" missile bro lmaoooo
>>517261594Sputnik was a hypersonic missile too?How fast did V2 missiles go?>about 6000kmThing is that's garbage and irrelevant, fag, your speed is worthless flying at 1000km altitude.
>>517262324The Russian Kinzhal in the OP is a high altitude missile as well, it isn't a maneuverable low altitude hyper-sonic missile. It's even more sad because it has to be air-launched to even get that speed.
>>517262211Wew that guy is almost as big as a Mig-31? No wonder Russia is losing so badly.
>>517254879that is actually badass and cool as f-ckif he really created or helped create this that means I cant hate biden even half as bad anymore and wtf that makes no sense at alloh wait Russia made this? then, I might have to like really like Russia now sorry, not sorry
>>517262432Turkroach mudslime IQ at display right here folks
>>517262397Not like it's really a good idea to go hypersonic below some 20-30km altitude.It's possible, but range will be drastically diminished.BrahMos 2 isn't far from being adopted, but it won't have more than 1000km range or so.
>>517255111The US is developing several ... The most advanced are the Army’s Dark Eagle and Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike, versions of which may be deployed in the next few years.Analysts have questioned the alleged capabilities of hypersonic weapons, and recent studies further undermine these claims. This makes one wonder why the US government is still devoting billions of dollars to their development and deployment, thereby taking money from other pressing national needs. For the last several years, research and development on hypersonic weapons has consumed several billion dollars annually, corresponding to about 3 percent of all US defense research and development spending. Cumulatively, the United States has spent over $10 billion so far on hypersonic weapons—a figure likely to grow once these weapons enter full-scale production.(science break down on why they suck)This makes you wonder whether the US Congress and Pentagon leadership understands this or has been blinded by the exaggerated claims about hypersonic weapons.In Russia and China, decision-makers may be similarly enthralled by the magical claims about hypersonic weapons put forward by their military advisors without understanding the nuance behind them. Ironically, both countries appear to have stepped up their own hypersonic development programs in part due to US interest in developing its HTV-2 hypersonic vehicle, although the program was effectively cancelled in 2012 after only a few tests.There is no doubt that the US can build and deploy functioning hypersonic weapons, especially ones with relatively low speeds and short ranges. The issue is whether these weapons make any military sense and are a wise use of taxpayer money, independent of whether other countries build them or not.Exaggerated claims about hypersonic weapons are driving lavish spending Congress does not seem to be looking critically enough at the US rush to build hypersonic weapons. It should look harder
>>517254879When you launch them.
>>517254879When american defence contractors import 100 million more genius indians, your days are numbered zigger!
>>517254879Biden isn't even the president anymore
>>517254879if hypersonic missiles are so great, why can't Russia just win agains Ukraine with them?
>>517262447
>>517262571>blabbering utterly devoid of contentClassic cope.
>>517262605uh oh, stinky
>>517254879we are still developing them. but, the urgency has slowed way down, since we saw how embarrassingly ineffective yours were. now everyone is jerking off about drone tech.
>>517262758>German education Come on it takes 2 seconds to Google if you want to read the meat of the argument https://thebulletin.org/2024/03/hypersonic-weapons-are-mediocre-its-time-to-stop-wasting-money-on-them/
>>517254879Can we even manufacture anything anymore? Will we be reliant on our enemies to give us the things we need to fight them? Lol. We're going to build shit out plastic, I guess, because we sure as shit ain't making anything out of US steel.
>>517262894when Trump mentioned the Golden Dome, China started sharting all over itself
>>517260055brown fingers typed this
Hmm so the thing about a hypersonic missile, the primary feature, is speed.But that speed can be a double edged sword. If you managed to place an object in front of it, the missile would tear itself apart. So you would need to have defenses in place ahead of time, which are capable of mobilizing within literally like 30 minutes. You must anticipate the path of the missile, and throw as much shit in front of it as possible. The obstructions can be small, something like shot pellets perhaps. The missile going through them would receive small punctures, and then tear itself apart with its own speed. Now these missiles fly at a super inconvenient altitude. Google is telling me it's 12-37 miles. Which is at the fuzzy border of atmosphere. That makes things difficult, because you'd need to have some drones hovering above the missile with a cache of metal pellets. Then drop the pellets at the appropriate time, creating a "waterfall" or "screen" which the missile passes through and shreds itself apart. However I believe it's difficult for a drone to maintain altitude that high up. You might need balloon assistance, with propeller support to stabilize and position the device. Put a couple 10's of thousands of those up in the sky between the US and China. They would run on solar power, and hover almost indefinitely. If a hypersonic missile comes screaming across the sky, you'd have about 1-2 hours to position them in approximate path of the missile, and trigger their waterfall at the appropriate time. A problem with this? The altitude is critical. If they sent the missile over your defenses, it doesn't work anymore. In that case, you'd need some kind of defense in Low Earth Orbit. My idea would be a counter-missile that shoots a wide-spread of metal bb's to intercept ICBM's or hypersonics flying in Low Earth Orbit. Once again, the principle is the same. Maximize the spread of coverage, and the missile should be impacted
>>517262989>we sure as shit ain't making anything out of US steelUS is the 4th largest steel producer in the world and only imports 24% of its steel. The primary suppliers to the US are from Canada, Brazil, and Mexico, followed by countries like South Korea, Japan, and Germany. Not sure where you came up with that idea.
don't you realize pic related is the most advanced military weapon every created?> massive spacecraft> can carry massive payloads and hit multiple targets on earth in minutes> can get refueled in space> can go to the fucking moon, land on it, and come back> basically a nuclear space submarine> could also be used defensively, like hundreds/thousands of them on space, with anti-ICBM > space lasers also a possibilityjust wait, the US military will make a sign a massive contract and attach a space force logo on this
>>517263154An issue I see is the winds in the high atmosphere. If you dropped metal pellets, they would be tossed asunder and it wouldn't form such a nice "screen". In that case, you might actually need something like a counter-missile. Or just, a bomb. Consider, a bunch of bombs hovering perpetually in the sky between the US and China. These bombs would be as high up as possible, at the edge of the atmosphere using balloon support. However, when kicked into action, they should be able to drop rapidly to the correct altitude. Like, position laterally, then go into a controlled fall down to the approximate altitude. Perhaps by deflating and then inflating their balloon. Then, when the missile comes close, they'd make a fine adjustment, and then explode, hopefully damaging the missile. Not sure if shrapnel is important here. But any scar on the hypersonic will ruin it, and make it tear itself apart in flight. Or, you could go a hundred feet or so above the path of the missile and do the waterfall-idea, that's also an option. That's kind of preferred, because you don't need as much accuracy.The reason I think this would work is because it's a capital-investment. These bombs remain hovering defensively for years, above an ocean where they can harmlessly fall, powered through solar energy and balloons.
>>517262992Not interested until the Platinum dome will enter service. Why cut corners like that?
>>517260835>They had their hands full doing Soviet things.Like funding left wing groups in the west that have spent over half a century undermining our institutions. You already praised Obama so you probably think that was a good thing. Sometimes, I'm glad the EU is collapsing into an orwelian nightmare so I won't have to hear your shit opinions after they cut you off from the rest of the internet like china.
>>517263462>can go to the fucking moon, land on it, and come backNo. If it could it would have already done it.>basically a nuclear space submarineNot at all. I won't deny that the Starship is pretty cool but it's a glorified space truck, nothing more for now.
>>517254879Seeing as America spends more money than the rest of the world combined on it's military, I imagine we already have defenses against it.Remember when that Aegis cruiser shot down the orbiting satellite? That was going hypersonic too.I'm sorry, but the country who's peak contribution to the world was the Lada Riva cannot boast a tech edge without some serious scruitiny. Not that the Riva was bad, but advanced is not a word I would use to describe it.
>>517261331I literally know someone that worked on our hypersonics in 2022. We absolutely have them whether you think so or not
>>517263543So the coverage of defensive bombs would have to cover about 3500 miles. You'd ideally want a hovering bomb every 400 meters or so, and you'd need several layers of them. That means 14,000 bombs per layer, perhaps 56,000 bombs total. Now, that's about the number of artillery shells the US produces per month. Seems like kind of an enormous number all things considered. If they were relatively small devices, like the size of your hand, it would be easier to maintain them. The problem is, you'd have to be way more accurate with them. Alternatively if they were the size of a howitzer shell, they wouldn't need to be as accurate, but they'd be harder to maintain up in the air. Which size and spread would work better? That's something that would need to be worked out.
>>517254879They've had them since the 70's. Sprint.
>>517263823>Like funding left wing groups in the west that have spent over half a century undermining our institutions.Pic related >>517264153>Seeing as America spends more money than the rest of the world combined on it's military, I imagine we already have defenses against it.>weDaily reminder that your nuclear force is directly under the control of the US.Also the peak contribution of Russia is the AK rifle, everyone knows that.
>>517264416>Also the peak contribution of Russia is the AK rifleWhich is a kind of shit rifle that's easy to produce.
>>517264416The AK is a mechanical copy of the German stg 44. Our nuclear arsenal is stored by the US. The nuclear subs and aircraft do not ask the president of the US to open fire.
>>517254879Hypersonics are kinda overrated. Their whole shtick is breaking through AA bubbles, but AA isn't nearly as effective as was advertised - breaking through them is trivial with high volume or low visibility, not necessarily hypersonic speeds. So it's an expensive over - engineered solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
Also no matter how good the tech is, war is a game of numbers. No matter how effective and advanced your defenses are, if they can get overwhelmed they are useless. This is why MAD is a thing, there's currently no way to prevent the complete destruction of both sides of the conflict in case of WW3. There are many more vectors for nukes than defensive capabilities. WebM for our dear resident neocons/sionist shills.
>>517264282So the hope is, the entire system would work completely automatically. Your sensors detect the missile and its path. The network automatically leaps into action and positions the bombs into the pathway. Then triggers the bombs at the appropriate moment. Again, the idea isn't to explode directly on the missile, but to put some shrapnel or something in the missle's path, so the missile's great speed does the work for you. Since these missiles are hypersonic, the atmospheric bubble around them could form a defensive bubble. Again you'd need to actually test this in the field. One crazy idea I had was to use magnetic forces somehow to steer the missile. Like, just position a device with a strong magnetic field that diverts the missile significantly, or latches something into the missile. The great speed of the missile probably doesn't allow for that, but it's just something to consider.
>>517264685It's not, it has entirely different mechanics Similarities are cosmetic.
>>517263154>>517263543>>517264282>>517264779DOD, FBI, CIA, I know you track my posts.This is something that could help my country, so take note of an idea from your most brilliant citizen.
a 3M22 Zircon hypersonic missile from a frigate in the Barents Sea, in the Arctic OceanIn the video originally shared on Telegram, the crew aboard the frigate Admiral Golovko fires the Zircon at a target in the Barents Sea, an area bounded to the west by the Norwegian Sea. According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the target was destroyed in a direct hit by its hypersonic missile, which can reach a distance of up to 1,000 kilometers and travel at Mach 9—nine times the speed of sound.The Zircon test is part of the Zapad 2025 joint maneuvers with Belarus, a week of military exercises aimed at assessing defensive and coordination capabilities between the two allied countries. It also serves to show that Russia's military force has not lost its strength, despite heavy losses more than three years after the start of the invasion of Ukraine.Notwithstanding the attempts to offer explanations, the joint Zapad 2025 military exercises between Russia and Belarus do little to reduce tensions in Eastern Europe. Although both nations insist that the exercises are defensive in nature, the proximity of the exercises to NATO borders, as well as tests of hypersonic missiles in the Arctic, raise new concerns among Atlantic Alliance member countries
>>517264685Why would you post stupid shit like that if you know nothing about the subject? It's crazy how many people are parroting that shitty statement, just because the form factor is more or less the same. The internals are nothing alike.>>517264538It's a good design, you can make it as bad (copy made in a Pakistani sweatshop) or as good as you want (SIG550 series). I've held an actual Izmash and it's very good and solid. Not as accurate as a nice AR but it doesn't matter in actual combat. Lots of other former Soviet block countries can also produce good AKs.
>>517264813>Similarities are cosmeticNo, they both use a gas piston system and fixed charging handle. Mechanically they operate with all the same principles.
>>517254879.Secret. Tomorrow.
>>517265051>SIG550 seriesThe SIG550 is not a copy of an AK. It's an advancement on the SIG510.
>>517254879That jet looks like an old tractor
>>517264416>actual soviet documents show them funding communists groups throughout the west that pushed everything from destroying nuclear power to the nuclear family>that was the kikes never mind all those kikes were also praising the USSR and taking their money at the timeOnce again you're making me glad your countries are going to shit.
>>517264976Barents Sea is divided between Norwegian and Russian territorial waters.Norwegian Sea is right of main coast of Norway
>>517265163No but it shares significant similarities with the AK design. I was pushing it a bit, maybe I should have mentioned the Galil instead.
>>517265315>maybe I should have mentioned the Galil instead.The Galil rifles aren't a highly end rifle either. It's selling point was cheap and stampable.
>>517265205I know that the soviets were pushing degeneracy during the cold war, we had "intellectuals" like Sartre that kept shilling for them, but it was more than 35 years ago mate. There's zero Russian influence when I turn on my TV in France. Guess who is doing all the influence nowadays?
>>517265473>The Galil rifles aren't a high end rifle either.
>>517265473High end and expensive =/= GOOD. A good rifle is something that keeps shooting no matter what.
>>517265560>A good rifle is something that keeps shooting no matter what.No, a good rifle is accurate. The AK and Galil aren't, they opt for low maintenance and cheap production as both states anticipated their troops wouldn't take care of their guns. Instead opting for replacablitiy.
>>517265482>Guess who is doing all the influence nowadays?The communist kikes they funded and supported who have captured our universities and government institutions. Do you think they coalesced out of the ether? They unleashed the societal equivalent of AIDs on us, so fuck them I hope the 2030s in Russia makes the 1990s look like a golden age.
>>517265770When is the last time you've shot with an AK? Modern russian AKs are about 2 moa brand new, it's perfectly fine for combat. After ten thousand rounds the accuracy is going to drastically drop on any rifle anyway. So of course you can find old busted AKs hosing bullets everywhere in bumfuck Africa but that's beside the point. My original point is that the AK was probably the most influential industrial product created by Russia during the 20th century. Not the Lada.>>517266028Your vision is too narrow. You also had super anticommunist neocons kikes like Kissinger piloting your government, who pushed the Vietnam war and all the next ones for zero gain, and are still keeping doing that shit right now. It's a little too easy to put the blame on the communists.
>>517254879if russia made these i might have to start liking russia a lot morethat is kinda cool as f-ck
>>517257207It means they have the technology. Typical Russian gloating with a nothing burger. The F-35 is not visible on radar before WVR, the pilot can see through the plane with his HMD, and target anything in his sights day or pitch black night, and it can launch stealth glide bombs accurately, and command up to 20 unmanned drones which can be used as decoys against enemy missiles. That's technology Russia wish it had. China copied it already.
>>517266505>who pushed the Vietnam warThis is laughable coming from a frog. You niggers inability to either hold onto or relinquish your colonial holdings gracefully are why communists got a foothold there and why we got involved there at all. Additionally, I like to remind you this conversation started with a kraut trying to say the soviets were not the bad guys when they are on record as trying to undermine western societies. So I blame both the communists and the kikes they supported for the damage they have caused. If you want to blame right wing kikes for getting us involved in forever wars you are right to do so, but that problem pales in comparison to damage caused by left wing kikes. You should blame right wing kikes for causing and supporting mass immigration if anything that has been much more disastrous for the west than any war in the last 70 years.
>>517255310>Country gets flooded and overrun with Rape DolphinsThat's like trading one bad thing for another
>>517268413My point was : the war in Vietnam was pointless. You went there and it changed nothing, except for the boys who died there for no good reason. All your seething changes nothing. In the end, left wing or right wing, no matter the country, the problem comes from the same reason, and you nailed it in the end.
>>517269063Your point is retarded and reductive of actual history for no reason other than to excuse the societal damage caused by communists. If you don't know how kikes gained so much power and caused so much damage you will never be able to actually undermine them. Also just a quick question before I go to bed, do you support mass immigration and the growing islamic population in France?
>>517269587Of course not, but Jews are on both sides of the Overton window anyway.
>>517255111>American policOk, post it
>>517254879It's cool they launch them off Foxhounds
The next world war will just be who can cause the most damage to the other side as quickly as possible, there will be no defending shit.
>>517257339>The USA is smart again in this case because it allowed them to focus on better tech. Like they have stealth missiles now.Nope. The gimmick was stealth but the trend is faster and bigger missiles.
>>517270198Well at least you're not brown and/or completely retarded. And yeah of course jews are playing both sides, how do you think they have survived so long despite being kikes. Point is hate anyone whose supports them and allows them to rise to power along with them. No reason to stick up for someone that lets rats into your house just because you already had a mouse.
>>517254879When they kick jeets out. I mean look at Microsoft the whole company is in literal fire because of jeets and winjeet 11 is just absolute meme of OS this is the state of whole tech industry and it applies for everything.
>>517254879Where do you think the Russians stole the tech from?
>>517255196Russia used it during the Ukraine war as a display, IIRC. They had a very low yield and were just a display of what they could do.They looked pretty cool.
