South Korea study of 8.4 million adults finds radically higher risks of overall, lung, prostate, thyroid, gastric, colorectal, abreast cancers etc, across both mRNA and viral-vector platforms already one year after inoculation. The study suggests the risk of getting cancer could grow even more in long term perspective, and this possibility should be further studied.The study proves without any doubts that "genetic vaccination" is linked to significant increases in multiple major cancers, with the signal consistent across all vaccine platforms, both sexes, and age groups.https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-wcDNA vaccines (AstraZeneca type): linked to higher risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.Overall cancer HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.39–1.56) -> 47% higher riskmodRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna): linked to higher risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers.Overall cancer HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.14–1.26) -> 20% higher riskHeterologous (mixed schedules): linked to higher risks of thyroid and breast cancers.Overall cancer HR 1.34 (95% CI 1.21–1.48) -> 34% higher riskIt is first study performed on such huge cohort (over 8 mln people) proving extremely oncogenic character of modRNA/AVV "vaccines">In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with an increased risk of six specific cancer types, including thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Notably, this COVID-19 vaccination-associated cancer risk was likely more elevated among individuals aged≤65 years
>>517409216how credible are those studies
>>517409216Oh no!? That's awfulOh no!
>>517409391highly
>>517409391>how credible are those studiesFar more credible than "Polish government", for sure xD
Do you mind making this thread on /sci/ ?I want to see how many good boys have remained there, lately they've been very quiet.
>another worthless xD thread
>>517409216
>>517410210Nope. All other boards are boring and heavily moderated. I posted smth few times there and nobody answered.
>>517410267Worthless how, faggot?
>>517410379If you don't mind I can make it?
>>517410468It is a pierdzioch. He thinks that his government injected him with vitamines in 2021/2022 and now he believes that Poland will conquer Moscow and become richer than Germany in the meantime. It is better to ignore xD
>>517410532Sure.
bump
A comprehensive literature review by Mathilde Debord titled "COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can induce cancer in 17 distinct ways, according to over 100 peer-reviewed studies" was previously published in Le Point Critique. Drawing from over 100 peer-reviewed studies, it outlines 17 distinct biological mechanisms by which the injections may initiate, accelerate, or reactivate malignant processes.https://lepointcritique.fr/2025/06/19/vaccins-arnm-anti-covid-peuvent-induire-cancer-de-17-manieres-distinctes-selon-plus-de-100-etudes/#_edn69It is most up-to-date collection of studies explaining carcinogenic processes of modRNA/AVV platforms.
>>517412655The list of these processes is open, of course. New things are being discovered all the time.
>>517412655Isnt there an English version?
>>517413217All studies enlisted there are in English. xD
>>517413288>enlistedOh my. I meant enumerated xD
Thats what Grok answered after analyzing the study. The machine skipped to exactly the same conclusions i did, of course.
>>517409216i personally didnt take the vax however basically everybody i know did. with the ccp virus vaxx causing all kinds of turbocancer and it being over 4 years old, when does the mass wave of death start? im tired of waiting 2 more weeks
>>517413988I am an atheist and i did not take it xD
>>517414146This is a reply from the /sci/ thread, I think its in good faith
>>517414311>when does the mass wave of death start?Cancer incidence grows rapidly every year after 2021 in highly inoculated countries. Especially amongst young adults.
>>517409216Interesting. But how we could have know that this is going to happen?
>>517412655That was already debunked.
>>517414396so...2 more weeks?
>>517414146ChatGPT say:>It seems like you've linked an article, but unfortunately, I can't access external websites or links directly. If you want to discuss the article or need help with a specific topic from it, feel free to share the details, and I can assist you with that! What's caught your attention in the article?I provided the direct link of course. He plays dump.
>>517410105Trump already recommended COVID vaccines. They work and they're safe
>>517414396I worked in the health sector on an administrative level. So i had a good overview.Sadly i have seen this with my own eyes. I began to notice it in 2022ish. More and more young people with cancer or suspicion of....
>>517414325It is not, it is some kind of troll xD
>>517414484How can you "debunk" few hundred studies xD
>>517414593They work just great in culling useless eaters and resource depletors who are no longer needed thx to cheap bioimport from India and AI datacenter expansion. He is right, they are very effective and safe for elites.
You anons clearly don't understand Science.
>>517409216They intentionally poisoned the planet with this. You'll never get rid of it either unless you cull anyone who ever had a vax or forbid them from breeding. Hypercancer is just going to be the norm forever. Pfizer and other companies profited from murdering the world.
>>517415103>They work just great in culling useless eaters and resource depletors who are no longer neededThey culled almost entirely first-world working professionals. The ones who didn't get the vax are Africans and other orcs. (((They))) were so hot to get rid of Whites that they've effectively doomed the planet to a Great Filter.
>>517414325This is what I figured, plus the risk increases are actually tiny even with higher certainty. Of course the science cucks that pushed this shit on us are going to pump out disinfo after disinfo to muddy the waters. I don't need studies, all I need is knowing the process of the mrna vax in the body to know it's fucking dangerous and I just ain't gonna take it!
>>517416676The guy is a troll. The study is about much higher overall risk of 6 types of cancer and thats what the study is about. Overall cancer HR 1.47 is linked to AVV vaccines in group of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers. Not all cancers, of course. I checked these calculations with Grok to be sure and everythings fine.https://x.com/i/grok/share/AOIZ7bfnSgiw8Ip60OCrslkXp
We have to get Elon Musk to weigh in on these studies.He said that he got himself and his kids vaccinated and said that he trusts mRNA vaccines.
>>517418452Musk and nobody from his family did not take it. He declared many times at the beginning that he wouldnt take the covid "vaccine" because he is in low risk group.https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-and-kids-wont-get-coronavirus-vaccine-2020-9?IR=T.. only to lie few years later that he did. He made up story about him almost ending up in hospital because of adverse events and he lied that his cousin got a myocarditis because of the vax.
>>517419739I'm not sure that he lied about getting he and his children vaccinated.
>>517420210He knew it was a bioweapon. Tesla contributed to production of machinery used for vial production. He shilled many times for these "vaccines" and he "predicted" population collapse in developed countries already in 2021 when it was not obvious yet as it is today.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/17030/
>>517409216are these results for "fully vaccinated" people? What about us one dose chads?
>>517420422Elon Musk has been going on about population collapse for a while, but because developed countries have such a low birth rate.
>>517409216> thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, prostate, breastGastric, colorectal, prostate and breast cancers are the ones detected by checkups. Suspicious.And why is the leukemia risk halved?
>>517409216 (OP)i've seen data which indicated doubled or tripled risk for cancer. this is a lot more mild.
>>517420484At least one dose, primarily 2. The study shows a very elevated cancer incidence in 6 major cancer type groups, already 1 year after modRNA/AVV "vaccination". It is very worrying and now we need long term studies to be performed focused on all types of neoplasms.
>>517414325BTW, discussion on this /sci/ board is on even lower level than on /pol/. The only difference is that posts there appear one per hour xD
>>517409216Woah!
>>517414325Haven't seen any debunk of this. Sci user found HR of 1.01.
>>517420714These six cancers are among the most common in South Korea, accounting for a large proportion of diagnoses. In 2025 projections, thyroid leads (most diagnosed overall) followed closely by colorectal, lung, breast, prostate and stomach (gastric). This high baseline incidence means the study had greater statistical power to detect modest risk elevations here, while rarer cancers (like pancreatic or ovarian) might show null results due to fewer events. Less common cancers have wider confidence intervals and it makes associations harder to achieve significance (p<0.05). LNPs in modRNA/AVV "vaccines" distribute spike-encoding material to specific organs where it persists for months at least. Preclinical data show significant accumulation in thyroid, prostate and GI tract. It would be also compatibile with these chosen cancer types. This could lead to localized inflammation or DNA integration risks.
>>517423359I explained why the guy is a troll here:>>517417488 and here:>>517423399
>>517423478Ok I just reposted your responses in the /sci/ thread so hopefully we can get a rebuttal.
>>517423670Feel free. Last time i posted there smth about 'vaccines' was like 2 years ago and my thread slided without even single response so i forgot about this /sci/ board
>>517409216>cDNA vaccines (AstraZeneca type): linked to higher risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.>Overall cancer HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.39–1.56) -> 47% higher riskThis is hopeful news for india.
>>517426614
>>517409216It means it's working
>>517409216Good.
>>517409391>unironically "trust the Pfizer"The goy king.
>>517420840I wouldn't call 120% "very elevated." and that'd presumably be lower for us who only took one shot. Maybe there'll be some increase with time, but that's only speculation at this point, I think.
>>517414593Pfizer and moderna switched the vaccines without telling Trump.
>>517414311If you're this blind to reality and the world around you, you should have just taken the shots. Too bad you can't anymore, eh?Just the boosters.
>>517414484Kek. Just keep taking your boosters, covid is on the rise again.
>>517429150Why'd you only take one dose? Are you some kind of an antiscience nutjob or something?Take your boosters, you're being dangerous.
>>517409216Its ok you can get an mrna for the cancer :D
Is novavax safe?
sheesh
>>517434753
>>517434096not sure
>>517409216Bump. And tip of the iceberg.
