Vulgar masculinity pertains to asthetics and behavior that involves selling your utility to others, being disposable and has a low barrier to entry. It is Male Gaze and represents the servile body forged from brutish hammer strikes. Its a one-dimensional flash in the pan among others.Noble Masculinity pertains to being admired and served but has a high barrier to entry. It is Female Gaze and requires fine intricate sculpting in physique and function. Its multidimensional light is enduring and leads itself to being noticed.Gatekeepers will tell you that Noble Masculinity is gay. They might even convince you that showing feminine grace means you should female horomones or on the other hand that you should pack on some muscle using exogenous male horomones, but in the end they all just want want to prevent you from embodying the Noble Masculine. The Noble Masculine only requires you to operate on what your body was designed for, not to be abused by supraphysiological alterations, it is natural beauty and health.
>>517646702bears v twinks, get help faggot nobody reading all that
>>517646702Ok, now show Noble Masculinity with Norwood 2 or greater
>>517646702Steroids are not healthy and ruin your hair
>>517646842Cant. Hair is part of the package. Dont lose your hair.
dnr we already have terms for this, ogres vs prettyboys, although women prefer even more effeminate and pretty pretty boys than the dudes on the right, top right kind of has the appeal, prime chico is more of a prime example
>>517646702>Vulgar masculinity pertains to asthetics and behavior that involves selling your utility to others, being disposable and has a low barrier to entry. It is Male Gaze and represents the servile body forged from brutish hammer strikes. Its a one-dimensional flash in the pan among others.>Noble Masculinity pertains to being admired and served but has a high barrier to entry. It is Female Gaze and requires fine intricate sculpting in physique and function. Its multidimensional light is enduring and leads itself to being noticed.>Gatekeepers will tell you that Noble Masculinity is gay. They might even convince you that showing feminine grace means you should female horomones or on the other hand that you should pack on some muscle using exogenous male horomones, but in the end they all just want want to prevent you from embodying the Noble Masculine. The Noble Masculine only requires you to operate on what your body was designed for, not to be abused by supraphysiological alterations, it is natural beauty and health.
>>517647470Prettyboys are in a separate dimension with an emphasis on broad male neotony. Noble masculinity can still be dimorphic with stronger bone structure and more stereotypical skilled behaviors. There is still the element of strength.
>>517647367Hairdressers uncontrollably orgasm when he shows up.
>>517646702all of them are gay
"noble masculine" = a bunch of ballet fags. get help man, go read something truly unique, go watch some samurai flicks or whatever ffs. as much as I hate this stereotypical nonsense of manly bear thing this is just ludicrous
>>517646702i spotted the nigger, mister mutt OP
>>517646702I think that image is wrong on both sides.The Noblest Masculinity is Andrew Tate unironically.
>>517648212>Noblest Masculinity is Andrew Tate unironicallyNoblest Faggot
>>517648012Ballet fags get prime women though. Vulgar masculine men come out empty handed. It seems paradoxical until we recognize the difference between male and female gaze.
>>517646702Don't care getting jacked.
>>517648212He is the trashiest person on the entire internet.
>>517646702It's ok to be gay now. You don't have to keep making up absurd and retarded copes claiming your attraction to men is snowflake masculinity.
>>517648289>Ballet fags get prime women thoughSimply not true man. I know young chicks always go with the flow and have zero originality so if today kpop "men" are the thing then whatever. To be fair yesterday some wannabe "ballet fag" (disgusting since I was holding hands with my wife) was checking me at the store while "his girl" was... also checking me, quite literally, dare I say eyeballing. I'm tall af and got a nice face so I get attention here and there but you see my point here.
>>517648289>Vulgar masculine men come out empty handedThis is very much true btw. Unless they're absolutely "hot" or whatever.
>>517648020stop talking shit about the new harry potter
>>517648289>Ballet fags get prime women thoughbecause they're constantly around women>Vulgar masculine men come out empty handedbecause they're constantly around men
>>517648212Andrew taint is a transexual on steroids. Total loser like your ancestors.
>>517646702Why are you presenting effetes as noble? I get why you designate antinatural mutants on hormonal interventions as “vulgar”—but the same designation could just as easily be applied to those other individuals you present, and also to your idealization of them. Granting that the latter is natural, and therefore healthier than the former, it might still be the case that their physiques (and namely their physiognomies) are the necessary product of the physiological retrogression of our species. These men are not as strong as the men of antiquity.As an aside, masculinity is not about appearance or attracting a gaze. That would be femininity. The latter engages in adornment as a means of domination through dissimulation. The former simply conquers by brute force—at least under natural conditions (which our anti-natural societies reverse).
>noble and vulgar are separateWhat a shame
>>517646702Top right is GAY lmao lul even
>>517646842This. If I had nice hair I'd dress like one of those Hogwarts faggots in the bottom right but I'm balding so who gives a fuck.
This is the gayest thread in the catalog right now.I just wanted to say that Kikes and Hindus deserve to burn in hell for eternity for supporting the Palestinian genocide and God will not forget.
>>517646702>no janoy straddling the line between the twoyou're a fraud OP
>>517649438Incoherent
>>517648838You being a Gigachad doesnt disprove anything. You already stated he (le gay ballet fag) was with his gf, something that most of the Vulgar Masculine men cant even get.>>517649341Because it has an additional dimension (masculine without a fear of embracing feminine grace) whereas Vulgar Masculinity is limited to existing in a single dimension, one that is easy to navigate and more accessible. The left examples would probably be stronger than men in antiquity imo, maybe not as rugged but certainly able to outlift them like beasts of burden. The point of masculinity is to attract women for reproduction, some rely on signaling utility (peasant strength) others through grace (intellect, skill, beauty.)
>>517646702if you don't instill fear in other men you have failed and are the bottom bitch on the societal totem pole and a failure at life. physical appearance is only one way of doing it of course
>>517649888Exactly, noble and vulgar masculinities aren't supposed to be separate.Designating both aspects as different and opposing is incoherent.Some of the greatest paragons of masculinity were renowned for being both. Hercules, Zeus, etc.
>>517649957The left would be torn to shreds by the men of antiquity. “Strength” here meaning in a combative sense, not strictly a lifting sense. I agree that they can almost certainly lift more.>The point of masculinity is to attract women for reproductionDo you figure that the aim of life is survival, and that reproduction is a means to that end? Or do you figure that reproduction, itself, is the aim? Because from my view, the aim is domination—whether it be achieved through brute force or deception (where the former is definitively masculine, and the latter definitively feminine). The men of pre-platonic Greece revered rape, for example, and exalted the male physique on account of its embodiment of strength and vitality.
>>517650324I was calling your leveling of the differences between the noble and the vulgar incoherent. Read, don’t just gloss over and assume I agree. Designating them as identical and in harmony passes entirely over the actual distinctions and strife between men. As for your cited example, what you define as “noble” and “vulgar” almost certainly differentiates from what the Hellenes saw as “noble” and “vulgar”—and if it does, I would argue that it’s precisely on account of your being vulgar (weaker) in comparison to them (where your reference, itself, is a vulgarization of Hellenic culture).
Vulgarity is about caracter not looks
>>517646702>you must be masculine>no, this type of masculineWhy is it that the descendents of quakers always think they should be able to tell others how to live. Oh thats right you got it from your ancestors, thank fuck we kicked you cunts out of europe
>>517650790You wrote 1 word in that reply, left it open to interpretation, and now you're telling me to read deeper into it and that I see it the wrong way? That your 1 fucking word is the summation of brevity's finest dances with wit?Are you the sort of guy who always had to talk down to people and got slugged in the mug by better men for it?You have a metric fucktonne to learn.
>>517651225>AngloidNGMI
>>517650497We could use the idea of general fitness, then yes. Men of antiquity would certainly outcompete the men on the left side. The Vulgar Masculinity I depict is mainly to point out a phenomenon occurring today. It certainly can use a makeover but as it remains currently, it has been stripped down to a single dimension that lacks the ruggedness of elder generations.Its kind of a chicken and the egg. Domination definitely is an ideal strategy, despite the gatekeeping of men calling Noble Masculinity gay, its actually who holds the power and domination. Left side works for men on the right side in most IRL cases.
>>517651285Skill issue
>>517646702Really elaborate cope for saying you can’t make any gainz little guy
>>517648212Sorry, but he is bald, therefore he cannot be noble.
>>517646842
>>517651306>Left side works for…Right, and calling men with less muscle “gay,” “twinkish,” etc. could be seen as an expression of resentment under that condition. Equates masculinity with mass and raw strength, and not overall fitness. Probably the individuals on the right would produce more eugenic offspring than the others on the left (who are usually manlets, spergs, etc.)
>>517651225do you shoot your steroids up your ass?
>>517651550
>>517646702I noticed a majority of men viewing and commenting on vids featuring the ogres on the left vs a majority of women gooning over the guys on the right, so it makes sense. Ogremaxxing shouldn't be a thing unless you're like 50 years old. Most of our youth years should be focused on prettyboymaxxing -- not just for female gaze/attention, but also to reap many benefits throughout all areas of life. Prettyboys are more likely to get employed and earn a higher salary because appearance matters
>>517651315Yes, weaklings do advertise themselves.
>>517652198I’ve noticed lol
>>517652318Remind yourself of that when you turn your monitor on.
>>517652146this. related anecdote: a while ago I went to buy something for lunch near where I was working, with my stained and dust covered clothes, I was in the fridge section for like 10 minutes straight thinking what sausage buy. then this old lady approached me.>hi sweetie, choose anything you want, I'll pay it for you :D>o-oh don't worry ma'am, I'm fine <3being pretty does influence in the treatment you receive. whether it is positive or negative.
